Posted on 02/11/2007 10:25:37 PM PST by BunnySlippers
Strategists are trying to determine how the front-loading changes will affect traditional presidential campaigning, but the consensus seems to be it will work to the advantage of the better-funded, high-name recognition front-runners who will have the money to compete in the big four's expensive media markets.
Should one of them falter in one or more of the early-January contests, such as in independent-minded Iowa or New Hampshire, they would have the resources to recover in the Feb. 5 mega-primaries, strategists say.
In the Democratic race, New York Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton holds strong early leads over her rivals in New Jersey and her native state of Illinois and in California. On the Republican side, former New York Mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani held a wide lead in a Quinnipiac University poll in New Jersey and California.
"If you take the lead in early January, you can convert it into a prohibitive delegate lead in the bigger states," said Mac Stipanovich, a Florida Republican campaign strategist.
New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson is in back of the Democratic pack. His advisers think he will have opportunities throughout the Western and Northeastern states to raise his political profile. They also say the power of the big four could cause front-runners to stumble.
"There's no question that the primary calendar is getting more front-loaded, and California is kind of the 800-pound gorilla in that schedule," said Democratic state party chairman and Richardson adviser John Wertheim. "Clearly, Hillary Clinton will have a formidable campaign, but that doesn't mean she will have an insurmountable campaign by any stretch of the imagination."
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
Interesting topic though.
It should be interesting whoever wins,, don't stay up all night beating up on the natives,, they get restless sometimes but most of them are OK. ;-]
You're obviously not on the ping list but you might like this.
More Bill simon
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1783242/posts
It will be over by Feb. 5, 2008 and terribly expensive media markets will be in the deciding mix. The candidates with the most money on hand are the prohibitive favorites. FReepers should take note for their future Internet activist efforts for their favorite candidate, the #1 goal is to RAISE MONEY.
Hillary has the most to lose early. She's the Democrat frontrunner only because she has the look of a winner. The liberal crazies who vote in the primaries don't like her stance on Iraq, and it's hard to tell where she really stands on a lot of other issues - which is just how she wants to keep it for as long as possible. Poke a hole in her image of inevitability early, and she might just fall apart.
I wanted to bring this topic front and center because I think most people do not know how different this election is going to be.
Folks keep saying thwy have 2 years. They do not have 2 years!
I've been saying what this article has been saying for weeks....
There's no hope for marginal candidates. The only way to increase hope is for all of them to drop out and endorse one of the others - of the marginal, hopeless candidates, Hunter is the best of the bunch.
If you're lucky maybe he can get a 20% showing in South Carolina or something (it's an open primary though) and maybe get to speak at the Convention in some sort of port-a-potty outside the hall.
I don't think the primaries should be changed. I hope this is not a movement simply to accomodate any specific candidate.
It isn't.
Four or five states have chosen to move up their primaries. It is costly but all appear to be on schedule for moving up.
Gone will be the luxury of having just one or two states which to focus on.
That's what the article says, but there are more than half a dozen that plan on moving up to February 5th, including most of the western states from Montana, down to the four corners region out to California and Washington.
Thank you. I'm glad you pointed that out.
2000 PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARY DATES AND CANDIDATE FILING DEADLINES FOR BALLOT ACCESS (Data as of 6/23/00) Note: Dates Subject to Change / General Election Date 11/7/00 |
Establishing the date for a Presidential primary, and determining the type of Presidential primary held, varies from state to state. This is due to differences in state statutes, party constitutions, party rules and regulations, party by-laws, and delegate selection plans. In some states, a caucus and/or convention may be held instead of a Presidential primary election. Other states may use a combination of both caucuses and primaries for delegate selection. This state-by-state variation should be kept in mind when examining this listing of dates for the 2000 Presidential primaries. Questions concerning a states primary election procedure should be addressed to the states Election Director. The dates listed are tentative and subject to change. | ||||
STATE | PRIMARY DATE |
CAUCUS DATE |
FILING DEADLINE FOR PRIMARY BALLOT ACCESS |
INDEPENDENT FILING 1 DEADLINE FOR GENERAL ELECTION |
Alabama | 6/6 |
4/7 | 8/31 Independent 7/3 Third/Minor |
|
Alaska | 5/19 (R) 5/20 (D) (Conventions) |
n/a | 8/9 | |
American Samoa | 2/26 (R) 3/7 (D) |
n/a | *2 | |
Arizona | 2/22 3/11 (D) |
1/13 1/10 (D) |
6/14 Independent/Third | |
Arkansas | 5/23 |
4/4 | 8/7 Political Groups | |
California | 3/7 |
12/23/99 Democrats 12/24/99 Others |
8/11 | |
Colorado | 3/10 |
1/3 | 7/10 3pm | |
Connecticut | 3/7 |
1/21 | 1/21 | |
Delaware | 2/5 2/8 (R) |
12/17/99 | 9/1 | |
D.C. | 5/2 |
3/3 5pm | 8/15 5pm | |
Florida | 3/14 |
1/4 | 7/15 | |
Georgia | 3/7 |
n/a | 7/11 | |
Guam | 2/26 (R) 3/18 (D) |
n/a | *2 | |
Hawaii | 3/7 (D) 5/19 (R) |
n/a | 9/8 | |
Idaho | 5/23 |
4/24 | 8/24 | |
Illinois | 3/21 |
1/19 | 6/26 | |
Indiana | 5/2 |
2/8 Noon | 9/1 Noon | |
Iowa | 1/24 |
n/a | 8/18 | |
Kansas |
4/22 (D) |
n/a | 7/31 Noon | |
Kentucky | 5/23 |
1/25 4pm | 8/8 4pm | |
Louisiana | 3/14 |
1/28 | 8/4 | |
Maine | 3/7 |
12/1/99 | 8/15 | |
Maryland | 3/7 |
12/27/99 Republicans 1/10/99 Democrats |
8/7 | |
Massachusetts | 3/7 |
12/23/99 Noon | 8/1 5pm | |
Michigan | 2/22 |
3/11 (D) |
12/10/99 | 7/20 4pm |
Minnesota | 3/7 |
n/a | 9/12 | |
Mississippi | 3/14 |
1/14 | 9/8 | |
Missouri | 3/7 |
12/21/99 | 7/31 | |
Montana | 6/6 |
3/23 | 8/9 | |
Nebraska | 5/9 |
3/9 | 9/1 | |
Nevada | 5/19-21 (D) 5/25 (R) (Conventions) |
n/a | 5/15 Third/Minor 7/7 Independent |
|
New Hampshire | 2/1 |
11/19/99 | 9/6 | |
New Jersey | 6/6 |
4/13 | 7/31 | |
New Mexico | 6/6 |
3/15 | 7/11 Minor 9/12 Independent |
|
New York | 3/7 |
1/6 | 8/22 Independent 7/13 Third/Minor |
|
North Carolina | 5/2 |
2/1 | 6/30 Independent | |
North Dakota | 2/29 (R) 3/7 (D) |
n/a | 9/8 4pm | |
Ohio | 3/7 |
1/7 | 8/24 Independent/Minor | |
Oklahoma | 3/14 |
1/12 | 7/15 | |
Oregon | 5/16 |
3/7 | 8/29 Independent/Minor | |
Pennsylvania | 4/4 |
1/25 | 8/1 | |
Puerto Rico | 2/27 (R) |
4/2 (D) |
1/8 Republicans | *2 |
Rhode Island | 3/7 |
11/30/99 | 6/28 | |
South Carolina | 2/19 (R) |
3/9 (D) |
12/13 Republicans | 7/15 Noon |
South Dakota | 6/6 |
4/4 | 6/20 Independent | |
Tennessee | 3/14 |
1/4 | 8/17 | |
Texas | 3/14 |
1/3 | 5/8 Independent 5/30 Third |
|
Utah | 3/10 |
1/17 | 8/30 Independent 2/15 Third/Minor |
|
Vermont | 3/7 |
1/17 5pm | 9/21 | |
Virginia | 2/29 (R) |
6/3 (D) (Convention) |
12/17/99 5pm | 8/25 Noon |
Virgin Islands | 2/26 (R) 4/1 (D) |
n/a | *2 | |
Washington | 2/29 |
1/21 | 7/1 | |
West Virginia | 5/9 |
1/29 | 8/1 Independent/Minor | |
Wisconsin | 4/4 |
2/15 | 9/5 | |
Wyoming |
It's a movement designed to benefit the establishment candidates.
Reward those the party bosses favor, and reduce the ability of we mere peons to have our voices heard.
Progressives support doing and changing whatever it takes so their guy and agenda benefits most, simple as that. Hence the push to move the California primary up.
It's why I detest moderates in general and especially their backers. ;-)
If they would just play the game according to the rules which have worked just fine in the past, we wouldn't have to be subjected to this barrageof inanities and insults.
jmo
Thanks but I'll avoid the Rush to Judgment many are so committed to forcing others to make and join them so early on.
Simon is but one more voice, amazing how he is so with the latest 'in crowd' now but wasn't when he ran. Curious how that works, No?
Well, Bill Simon is a close personal friend of Rudy and is supporting him and doing fundraisers.
Speaks well of Rudy.
And, as you know, Rudy was having lunch with Bill Simon when the first plane hit on 9/11.
Well , good for him. Bill backed aRnie as well, agian , we see how that panned out.
Sometimes blind loyalty is not the best approach, we'll see.
Your posting deserves a thread of its own, and I note I have 13 months to make up my mind. :0)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.