Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Seems she was obeying the rules and they still stopped her. On the other hand, she really did not need to bring the milk back with her, since she had milk available in the original containers.
1 posted on 02/12/2007 11:33:48 AM PST by Michael.SF.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Michael.SF.

Maybe she was dehydrated? LMAO


2 posted on 02/12/2007 11:35:00 AM PST by statered ("And you know what I mean.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael.SF.

I am a mommy and I'm special. But seriously, why not do some sensible profiling and stop harassing Americans?


3 posted on 02/12/2007 11:35:19 AM PST by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael.SF.

This treatment is udderly ridiculous.


5 posted on 02/12/2007 11:39:41 AM PST by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael.SF.
On the other hand, she really did not need to bring the milk back with her, since she had milk available in the original containers.

I know that's a clever line, but my wife has to express milk every day so I can bottle-feed my son in her absence.

I swear, there are times when I'd value those little plastic bags over bags of gold. That she had to throw them away after following all the rules is criminal, but not unexpected.

6 posted on 02/12/2007 11:40:09 AM PST by highball ("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael.SF.

The "original containers" have limited capacity. In addition to physical discomfort associated with not emptying them, their production will quickly slow in response to not being emptied regularly. The little tyke is entitled to all his mama can produce.


8 posted on 02/12/2007 11:44:02 AM PST by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael.SF.

I find this whole liquids thing rather silly. It is quite possible for someone to take down a plane by packing enough explosives inside of a metal sealed tube or battery LOOKING device that would fool the average TSA screening agent.

For that matter, thin film plastic explosives can be worn on the body, under a hair piece, within a belt, socks, etc.

In short, targeting the METHOD of attack is not as effective as targeting the PERSON who will be carrying out the attack.


10 posted on 02/12/2007 11:45:29 AM PST by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael.SF.
Airport security agents in Las Vegas earlier this month banned Rachel Popplewell of Capistrano Beach

Particularly if the airplane A/C is on high...

11 posted on 02/12/2007 11:46:18 AM PST by mikrofon (Breast Milk Brew-haha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael.SF.
On the other hand, she really did not need to bring the milk back with her, since she had milk available in the original containers.

ROTFLOL! Good point.


12 posted on 02/12/2007 11:47:20 AM PST by Tamar1973 (Note to Hillary, Boxer and Fonda: The peas called, they want their pod back!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael.SF.

Even for a one day trip, I'm a bit surprised that she only had 6 ounces of milk. This might be in the TMI category, but it only takes me about 2 hours to produce that much milk (3 oz from each side).

If she was gone most of the day, what happened to the rest of the milk. Did she not have a problem throwing that away?

Not that I'm condoning TSA for making her throw it away. It seems she followed their guidelines, and they messed up (as usual).


13 posted on 02/12/2007 11:47:30 AM PST by elc (Guns kill people the same way the spoon made Rosie O'Donnell fat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael.SF.

For cryin' out loud, the kid didn't starve. He was fed while she was gone. She didn't need to bring the milk back. Sheesh!


15 posted on 02/12/2007 11:49:01 AM PST by lilylangtree (Veni, Vidi, Vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael.SF.
"If she had exactly what was required, I don't understand what happened," Nico Melendez said. "It should not have happened. Please accept our apology."

And that is the correct answer. Refreshing to see nowdays.

19 posted on 02/12/2007 11:52:48 AM PST by beltfed308 (Democrats :Tough on Taxpayers, Soft on Terrorism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael.SF.

Every time I go through such a screening I get a disturbing image in my head of 19 guys in hell laughing at our goofiness in the way we confiscate breast milk and grandma's water bottle. I used to enjoy air travel. Now it feels like defeat.


23 posted on 02/12/2007 12:04:53 PM PST by DancesWithBolsheviks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael.SF.

I was never a Guernsey like my next door neighbor in the milk producing department, but I know if I wanted to up my production, I'd just express more milk, and voila, in the next few hours, I'd be producing more milk.

Six ounces doesn't seem like much production to me. And, yes, unless it was frozen or in a cooler, it doesn't seem like it's something I'd be wanting to give to my kid.


25 posted on 02/12/2007 12:24:48 PM PST by sockmonkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael.SF.

"Seems she was obeying the rules and they still stopped her. "

The plastic baggies are not meant for beverages, but for medical, hygenic, and cosmetic gels and liquids. If that were true, people would be slipping bottles of water, cans of coke, or containers of coffee inside those plastic bags to get them past security.


27 posted on 02/12/2007 12:31:07 PM PST by Kirkwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael.SF.

C'mon, everyone knows that breast milk is a very volatile liquid!


29 posted on 02/12/2007 12:46:28 PM PST by marvlus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael.SF.
On the other hand, she really did not need to bring the milk back with her, since she had milk available in the original containers.

Just wait, they'll ban those too.

32 posted on 02/12/2007 1:03:49 PM PST by TChris (The Democrat Party: A sewer into which is emptied treason, inhumanity and barbarism - O. Morton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael.SF.
"You should be allowed to carry it, and you should be treated like a human being who is feeding your child," Popplewell said.

Except that she wasn't feeding her child.

35 posted on 02/12/2007 1:19:26 PM PST by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael.SF.
she had milk available in the original containers.

True, however, let's not forget the case of the flying waitress stewardess flight attendant who got bent at the sight of a nursing mother. She would seem to be in a Catch-22 situation. (Or Catch-36DD, as the case may be.)

39 posted on 02/12/2007 1:26:15 PM PST by Redcloak (The 2nd Amendment isn't about sporting goods.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael.SF.

Breast milk is much better sucked from the source.


40 posted on 02/12/2007 1:26:34 PM PST by zarf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson