Skip to comments.
The Conservative Movements of 2008
Renew America ^
| 02/12/2007
| Adam Graham
Posted on 02/12/2007 11:39:59 AM PST by Keyes2000mt
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
To: Keyes2000mt
Renew America is Alan Keye's blog, isn't it?
And how conservative is it that he endorses reparations?
2
posted on
02/12/2007 11:41:42 AM PST
by
Peach
(The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they captured or killed.)
To: Peach
For the 1 millionth time. Alan Keyes
DOES NOT
personally endorse, edit, or control everything on his site. Please stick to the topic at hand, sir.
3
posted on
02/12/2007 11:44:03 AM PST
by
Keyes2000mt
(A Statesman Not a Politician: John Cox for President (http://idahoforcox.wordpress.com))
To: Keyes2000mt
Good luck, you'll need it.
4
posted on
02/12/2007 11:44:50 AM PST
by
Rudder
To: Peach
---"Renew America is Alan Keye's blog, isn't it?"---
Reparations are not Conservative, just as Rudy Giuliani is not Conservative.
I guess the big question is: Is Rudy Liberal enough for you, or should we look even further left for the GOP nominee? I'm hard-pressed to find anybody there, but I was just wondering.
Some people are unappeaseble, after all. You just can't be Liberal enough for everybody, sometimes.
5
posted on
02/12/2007 11:45:53 AM PST
by
TitansAFC
(Pacifism is not peace; pacifists are not peacemakers.)
To: Keyes2000mt
When you can't attack the idea, you attack the man. Take it as an admission.
To: Keyes2000mt
Nice job spreading disunity, Adam. By the way, did you participate in the 1992 election?
7
posted on
02/12/2007 11:46:03 AM PST
by
rhombus
To: Keyes2000mt
When we conservatives acquire more influence then the liberal media, then maybe conservatives will have a chance to govern once again. Why is it that conservatives are not acquiring media outlets? The war between liberals and conservatives will not be won at the polls, nor by wishful thinking. The war for the minds of Americans will be won the same way that minds have always been won, propaganda, persuasion, imitation, and coercion.
8
posted on
02/12/2007 11:46:21 AM PST
by
street_lawyer
(Conservative Defender of the Faith)
To: rhombus
It's February, the year before the election. The party is not supposed to be united, or has some crowned a king and not told me.
9
posted on
02/12/2007 11:48:42 AM PST
by
Keyes2000mt
(A Statesman Not a Politician: John Cox for President (http://idahoforcox.wordpress.com))
To: Keyes2000mt
Hey now,, if the dems can anoint Obama, "we" can anoint Rudy..
10
posted on
02/12/2007 11:53:15 AM PST
by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi ......)
To: Keyes2000mt
They will only back candidates who they think can realistically win the generalThey are also called "normal people".
To: Keyes2000mt
We had a popular Conservative as POTUSA.
Next was a one term moderate.
Next was a two term traitor, who some people think was conservative.
Next was a two term moderate that squeaked by because the democrats nominees were very bad.
Now some people want a far left winger as the Republican nominee that most real democrats can beat because they can run to the right of any of them.
12
posted on
02/12/2007 11:58:07 AM PST
by
HuntsvilleTxVeteran
("Remember the Alamo, Goliad and WACO, It is Time for a new San Jacinto")
To: rhombus
[ Nice job spreading disunity, Adam. By the way, did you participate in the 1992 election? ]
Does anybody know what...
"I'm a Unite'er not a Divide'er".... means?...
Been working on that for 6 years.. and can't figure it out..
13
posted on
02/12/2007 11:59:12 AM PST
by
hosepipe
(CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole....)
To: NormsRevenge
Hey now,, if the dems can anoint Obama, "we" can anoint Rudy.. You mean if the dems can anoint a liberal with no military or foreign policy background during wartime well, the Reps can anoint a liberal with no military or foreign policy background during wartime.
To: Keyes2000mt
It's February, the year before the election. The party is not supposed to be united...Sorry, I missed the rules. I agree, primaries are good. The "Coalition" described is not even cohesive enough to be called a coallition. They are indeed "ideologically committed" but they don't necessarily agree on what the priorities of the ideologoy should be (social, economic, balance of powers, etc.).
15
posted on
02/12/2007 12:00:35 PM PST
by
rhombus
To: street_lawyer
I agree with you 100%.
Good post and food for thought.
Regards,
AR
16
posted on
02/12/2007 12:02:41 PM PST
by
alarm rider
(Fear of Hillary is the distinguishing feature of the average and even well educated conservative.)
To: hosepipe
Does anybody know what... "I'm a Unite'er not a Divide'er".... means?... Been working on that for 6 years.. and can't figure it out.. I do for sure. It's the same nonsense that Americans hunger for every 8 years. Obama is preaching that same message now. People who don't love politics get sick and tired of the life-blood of politics (scandal, nasty bickering, etc.). So any politician who goes out and preaches "uniter not a divider" gets their ear. It's just another way people fool themselves. Any politician who ignores that need in the people is also known as a loser.
17
posted on
02/12/2007 12:06:17 PM PST
by
rhombus
To: Keyes2000mt
"These people may (like Giuliani Blogger Patrick Ruffini) hope for a position in the next administration and so support someone who is utterly detestable on any number of issues in order to further their own careers."
The money quote.
18
posted on
02/12/2007 12:07:34 PM PST
by
Beagle8U
(Jimmy Carter changed me into a Republican.......Ronnie made me DAMN proud of it!)
To: Keyes2000mt
19
posted on
02/12/2007 12:08:00 PM PST
by
Peach
(The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they captured or killed.)
To: alarm rider
The problem we face is that conservatives are honorable people. It goes with the territory. Conservative ideology is not just all about low taxes, but has a moral foundation that liberals do not have. Consequently to compete with liberals the playing field will never be level. For example: "There has been a broad, concerted effort to intimidate and silence them [scientists who oppose man-made global warming]," said Myron Ebell, director of energy and global-warming policy at the Competitive Enterprise Institute. "It's the typical politics of the hard left at work. I think these are real threats."
20
posted on
02/12/2007 12:10:36 PM PST
by
street_lawyer
(Conservative Defender of the Faith)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson