STALINIST RISING? HILLARY CLINTON ABUSE OF POWER (Where is the UNREDACTED BARRETT REPORT anyway?)

02.13.07 | Mia T

[MeekOneGOP]

Click here or on the pic for the article.

[PhilDragoo]

From each according to his ability
to me because I say so.

--She Who Must Be Oyveyyed--

[Mia T]

"Many of you are well enough off... " Sen. Clinton said. "... We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good."

Notice the pronoun.
"You."
Not "we" and "us."

I suppose her private stash...
and the clinton foundation quid-pro-quo slush fund...
are off-limits.

Which would be nothing new....

 

THE RUBES' GOLDBERG MACHINE
A STATE OF PERPETUAL CLINTON BEGGARY

 

THE DRAMATIC INCREASE IN HILLARY CLINTON'S DISCLOSED ASSETS: An Alternative Theory


WHEN CATTLE FUTURES ARE THE FUTURE:
HILLARY CLINTON'S COW TRADES AS PROGNOSTIC


ON ICE: WM. JEFFERSON'S FREEZER vs. THE WM. JEFFERSON CLINTONS' SWISS ACCOUNTS


How To Get Rich Quick In Shady Land Deals Like Harry Reid and hillary clinton


QUID PRO COAL2:
CLINTON CORRUPTION + THE SEQUESTRATION OF GASEOUS FOSSILS
(HILLARY DOES COAL AT THE NATIONAL PRESS CLUB)


THROUGH A GLASS DARKLY:
HOW DECADES OF CLINTON DOUBLE-DEALING COMPROMISED OUR NATIONAL SECURITY


DUBAI-ITIES:
HILLARY 'KNOWNOTHING VICTIM' CLINTON STRIKES AGAIN


DICK MORRIS:
CLINTON IS A PAID AGENT OF THE CROWN PRINCE OF DUBAI


WHY HILLARY IN THE OVAL OFFICE IS A NATIONAL-SECURITY NO-NO^{PART ONE}

[PhilDragoo]

As well as pronouns, she uses the Secret Service and her no-eye-contact dictum to distance herself, to position the plebes.

She's very much the arctic ruler, too dirty to be a queen, lacking a phallus to be Stalin, showing the stress in her yammering.

[jla]

bump

[Mia T]

thank you :)

[Mia T]

hillary clinton is unfit in so many ways....

Mentally fit people do not rape.

[Wolverine]

bump

[malia]

Thanks for bringing up The Barrett Report again!

I guess we will just keep waiting!

[bmwcyle]

bttt

[Mia T]

NOTE:

According to Mark Goodman, a democrat, (The Barrett report, January 31, 2007):

1. Tony Snow reported that by all accounts the redacted pages contained enough damning evidence to sink Mrs. Clinton's presidential ship.
   
   
2. [T]here was a catch to the redaction: Any congressman could secure a copy of the vaulted evidence merely for the asking.
   
   
3. An abiding theme in the redacted pages, insiders say, is the Clinton camp practice of using the IRS to punish its enemies. Mr. Clinton plainly did not leave this illegal practice behind in the Oval Office. By all accounts he has maintained a tight grip on a number of government departments and agencies, notably the Justice Department and the IRS, the folks who can deal the deadliest damage.
   
   
4. It's a puzzlement: Why would the Republicans sit on a report they think destined to deep-six the presidential campaign of the Democratic front-runner?
   
   
5. Alas, there are several unholy answers to that riddle. The first is the cynical theory that we don't really live in a democracy but in a series of autocracies changed at fixed intervals. Thus the inevitable corollary: At the top, power-brokers stick together.
   
   
6. And if they have to suffer a Democrat in the White House, who better than Mrs. Clinton, poster girl for moral ambiguity? In that event, it follows, the sequestered pages of the Barrett Report would surely give the Republicans a dandy wild card when upcoming hands are dealt on Capitol Hill. Bluntly put, they'd have Mrs. Clinton at least halfway in their pocket.

Goodman misses the obvious, i.e., point 3 and Filegate (as well as point 5) are the Catch-22, the bottom-line reasons why no one--not any congressman, not George W. Bush--will make public the evidence of the clintons' gross abuse of power, their Stalinist methods.

That is to say, the clintons' very abuses of power protect the clintons from the exposure of those abuses of power.

Is there really no one of courage and integrity left in DC?

 

 

[Mia T]

There is another possibility: The Rs are holding this stuff and will unleash it if she gets the nomination... and they will time the release so that it does the most damage....

[Mia T]

Remember. all it will take is one brave soul. How can the clinton machine truly protect against that?

Seems if the Ds nominate the Stalinist, they are taking a BIG chance.

[Mia T]

Goodman misses the obvious, i.e., point 3 and Filegate (as well as point 5) are the Catch-22, the bottom-line reasons why no one--not any congressman, not George W. Bush--will make public the evidence of the clintons' gross abuse of power, their Stalinist methods.

That is to say, the clintons' very abuses of power protect the clintons from the exposure of those abuses of power.

Is there really no one of courage and integrity left in DC?

To make the clinton abuses of power public is not enough.

We, The People must demand that these two Stalinists are prosecuted for their crimes.

To do any less is to undermine the very foundation of our country.

[Mia T]

That said, I still like it. ;)

And it's just the right segue, IMO

[Mia T]

thx bmwcyle :)

[bmwcyle]

bttt

[Lee'sGhost]

"Remember. all it will take is one brave soul."

We don't even need that. It just takes one Congressman who is about to leave because he/she has been voted out or is retiring and has nothing to lose.

[Mia T]

Would that this were true.
Political viability isn't the only clinton weapon.

The IRS went after Free Republic, Juanita Broaddrick, Katherine Prudhomme, and virtually all clinton critics.

If we can somehow disseminate this information, we can make NOT RELEASING the evidence the politically untenable option.

The only way we will truly cure this problem is to purge DC of the professional pol.

[Mia T]

thx again :)