Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BREAKING! (video)-CLINTON IS A PAID AGENT OF THE CROWN PRINCE OF DUBAI: Dick Morris
O'Reilly Factor | 3.03.06 | Mia T

Posted on 03/03/2006 7:07:54 PM PST by Mia T

DICK MORRIS: CLINTON IS A PAID AGENT OF THE CROWN PRINCE OF DUBAI

by Mia T, 03.03.06

 


A CALL TO IMPEACH CLINTON IN ABSENTIA



by Mia T, 11.17.05


 

 

 

 





id you see it? More to the point, did the American press?

bill clinton made page one of Al Jazeera today. A schizophrenic mix of schadenfreude and agitprop, it was the story of an impeached ex-president of America trashing America--to standing Os--in the Arab state of Dubai--in the middle of a war zone--only several hundred miles from the American troops.

And, to rub it in, the traitor pocketed no less than $200,000 from the enemy for his troubles.

Having failed to snare the Nobel Peace Prize by ignoring terrorism, clinton has apparently decided to intensify his America-bashing on foreign soil, the method employed by Jimmy Carter to great (if somewhat belated) effect.

(The Nobel committee, sufficiently mollified only after 24 years of the peanut president's America-bashing, awarded Carter his 1978 Peace Prize finally in 2002.)

Meanwhile, back in the Senate, the missus, the other half of the clinton construct, maintains her hawkish pose (although not without bird problems of another sort).

Yet another example of the clinton conflation ploy, (see SCHEMA PINOCCHIO: how the clintons are handling the hillary dud factor), this variant allows "clinton, the construct" to hold two mutually exclusive positions simultaneously, thereby enabling the missus to avoid in '08 the trap that repeatedly ensnared the ever 'nuanced' Kerry in '04.

Do you now understand how stupid the clintons think you are?

 

I M P E A C H M E N T
h e a r --c l i n t o n --l o s e --i t



by Mia T, 11.11.05

This legacy confab is in and of itself proof certain of clinton's deeply flawed character, and a demonstration in real time of the way in which the clinton years were about a legacy that was incidentally a presidency.

Madeleine Albright captured the essence of this dysfunctional presidency best when she explained why clinton couldn't go after bin Laden.

According to Richard Miniter, the Albright revelation occurred at the cabinet meeting that would decide the disposition of the USS Cole bombing by al Qaeda [that is to say, that would decide to do what it had always done when a "bimbo" was not spilling the beans on the clintons: Nothing]. Only Clarke wanted to retaliate militarily for this unambiguous act of war.

Albright explained that a [sham] Mideast accord would yield [if not peace for the principals, surely] a Nobel Peace Prize for clinton. Kill or capture bin Laden and clinton could kiss the 'accord' and the Peace Prize good-bye.

If clinton liberalism, smallness, cowardice, corruption, perfidy--and, to borrow a phrase from Andrew Cuomo, clinton cluelessness--played a part, it was, in the end, the Nobel Peace Prize that produced the puerile pertinacity that enabled the clintons to shrug off terrorism's global danger.

READ MORE


C-SPAN asked noted presidential historians to rank the American presidents1 along the following ten dimensions: public persuasion, crisis leadership, economic management, moral authority, international relations, administrative skills, relations with congress, vision/setting an agenda, pursued equal justice for all, and performance within context of times.

bill clinton emerged as middling in most dimensions; he was surpassed in others by a settled mediocrity (Carter) and a putative failure (Nixon). In moral authority, bill clinton was rated dead last.2 He did fairly well in public persuasion, not a surprising finding given the volume of snake oil he managed to peddle during his putative presidency.

"It's NOT the economy, stupid!"

Clinton's best scores were on the economic management and pursued equal justice for all dimensions. However, both of these results are meaningful only insofar as they redound to the moral authority dimension: they are wholly based on clinton fraudulence, cooked books and black poses, respectively; and clinton's shameless Rosa Parks eulogy last week assured us that the insidious brand of clinton racism is alive and well during these tiptoe years of what the clintons hope will be their interregnum.

Note that although Brinkley doesn't place much importance on the economic management dimension--he argues that the economy variable is not durable over time--he fails to recognize that the evaluation of the clinton economy by the historians is erroneous to begin with.

Note also that C-SPAN historians found no evidence of clinton "greatness" irrespective of his moral-authority deficit, contrary to Douglas Brinkley's claim made at the clinton revisionist confab3.

(NOTE: My later research has revealed that Brinkley's qualified mention of clinton "greatness" was not a claim but rather a polite guest's white lie about an abject loser. Instead of taking the AP report at face value, one must carefully parse Brinkley's actual words and especially note the subjunctive construction.)

MIDDLING


Twenty presidents rank higher than bill clinton and 20 rank lower. But this placement assumes equal weight for each of the dimensions. And therein lies the flaw.

If 9/11 taught us anything, it is that presidential character and moral authority count, and count most.4 If the variables are properly weighted, bill clinton will always come out dead last.

That is, unless Americans are dumb enough to make the same mistake twice.

Mia T, 11.10.05
Historian massages clinton numbers, ego + legacy at revisionist confab
C-SPAN historians find no clinton "greatness" irrespective of moral-authority deficit

 

 

IT TAKES A CLINTON TO RAZE A COUNTRY
by Mia T, 11.14.05

(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)
 

COPYRIGHT MIA T 2004


COPYRIGHT MIA T 2006



TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: ahabandjezebel; bill; bribery; bush; clintoncorruption; conflictofinterest; crownprince; d; dickheaddis; dickmorris; dickwhorris; dubai; gwot; hillary; hillary2006; hillary2008; kickbacks; moneylaundering; port; portdeal; ports; terrorism; terrorists; treason; uae; waronterror; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200201-215 next last

1 posted on 03/03/2006 7:08:02 PM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Wolverine

ping


2 posted on 03/03/2006 7:09:21 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Here’s the new world order:

Cultures that support separation of church and state: Christian, Confucian, Buddhist, Hindu, and Orthodox

Cultures that don’t support separation of church and state: Muslim

If you want world peace, guess which one has to go?

3 posted on 03/03/2006 7:11:08 PM PST by Cornpone (Who Dares Wins -- Defame Islam Today -- Tell the Truth About Mohammed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Well well what the rats say now?


4 posted on 03/03/2006 7:14:56 PM PST by demlosers (Kerry: "Impeach Bush, filibuster Alito, withdraw from Iraq, send U235 to Iran, elect me President!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

This is important information. What a scumbag.


5 posted on 03/03/2006 7:15:14 PM PST by 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten (When Bush says "we mustn't act like clowns," the RATS don their multi-colored wigs and greasepaint.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cornpone
Hmmmm ~ separation of church and state ~ the Byzantine Emperor was "head" of the Orthodox for a very long time. Did they abandon that idea finally?

You really have to be careful with these blanket statements because it only takes one case to the contrary to disprove them.

Oh, yes, Queen Elizabeth is head of the Anglicans. Almost forgot her. They have state churches in the Scandinavian states as well.

I'm trying to remember when Buddhism renounced the privilege of kicking around the state (when it can), and Shinto was a state religion not too recently ~ caused all sorts of problems too.

6 posted on 03/03/2006 7:15:35 PM PST by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
Well well what will the rats say now?
7 posted on 03/03/2006 7:15:54 PM PST by demlosers (Kerry: "Impeach Bush, filibuster Alito, withdraw from Iraq, send U235 to Iran, elect me President!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten; demlosers
'Conflict of interest' doesn't begin to describe what we have here...

December 7, 1941+64

AN OPEN LETTER TO TIM ROBBINS, DAVID GEFFEN, CHRIS MATTHEWS, MAUREEN DOWD + JEANINE PIRRO

RE: a not-so-modest proposal concerning hillary clinton



Dear Concerned Americans,

Hillary Clinton's revisionist tome notwithstanding, 'living history' begets a certain symmetry. It is in that light that I make this not-so-modest proposal on this day, exactly 64 years after the attack on Pearl Harbor.

The context of our concern today--regardless of political affiliation--is Iraq and The War on Terror, but the larger fear is that our democracy may not survive.

We have the requisite machines, power and know-how to defeat the enemy in Iraq and elsewhere, but do we have the will?

In particular, do we have the will to identify and defeat the enemy in our midst?

Answerable to no one, heir apparent in her own mind, self-serving in the extreme, Hillary Clinton incarnates this insidious new threat to our survival.

What we decide to do about Missus Clinton will tell us much about what awaits us in these perilous new times.

COMPLETE LETTER

December 7, 1941+64
Mia T
AN OPEN LETTER TO TIM ROBBINS, DAVID GEFFEN, CHRIS MATTHEWS, MAUREEN DOWD + JEANINE PIRRO
RE: a not-so-modest proposal concerning hillary clinton


COPYRIGHT MIA T 2005


8 posted on 03/03/2006 7:16:06 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Is he paid in cash or women?


9 posted on 03/03/2006 7:16:38 PM PST by alancarp (NASCAR: Always turning left, but can never keep up with the Liber-commis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten

Bill will do ANYTHING for money -- and ANYTHING to keep his wife from achieving the presidency. My opinion.


10 posted on 03/03/2006 7:16:43 PM PST by i_dont_chat (I defend the right to offend!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Cornpone

As far as Billzo being a "paid agent", and that being news, I'd encourage you to note that he was always a "paid agent" and did not recently abandon being one.


11 posted on 03/03/2006 7:16:48 PM PST by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

touché


12 posted on 03/03/2006 7:17:51 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: i_dont_chat

The first part of your thesis is self-evident - the second part is frankly perplexing - could you expand on it?


13 posted on 03/03/2006 7:18:02 PM PST by 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten (When Bush says "we mustn't act like clowns," the RATS don their multi-colored wigs and greasepaint.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Thanks Mia.


14 posted on 03/03/2006 7:18:46 PM PST by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Allen

ping


15 posted on 03/03/2006 7:20:12 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: alancarp
Is he paid in cash or women?

Probably both. Here is is with Dubai's Sheik Maktoum checking out some prospects. - tom


16 posted on 03/03/2006 7:20:34 PM PST by Capt. Tom (Don't confuse the Bushies with the dumb Republicans - Capt. Tom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ncountylee

you're welcome :)


17 posted on 03/03/2006 7:20:40 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

If I read it all before I comment, nobody will know that I care as I'll be lost in the rough.

So kudos to you, and I am off to play a round on your links.

Thanks!


18 posted on 03/03/2006 7:20:49 PM PST by Radix (Stop domestic violence. Beat abroad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

In a sense you are correct. To paraphrase Einstein, "No number of experiments can prove me right but it only takes one to prove me wrong."


19 posted on 03/03/2006 7:22:02 PM PST by Cornpone (Who Dares Wins -- Defame Islam Today -- Tell the Truth About Mohammed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Radix

thx :)


20 posted on 03/03/2006 7:22:18 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
..... in the end, the Nobel Peace Prize that produced the puerile pertinacity that enabled the clintons to shrug off terrorism's global danger.

Amazing that so many covet this "peace" prize as if it were a piece of heaven itself. .....especially since it's been completely disgraced (after Carter, Annan, and Arafat took it home). In fact, getting nominated is about as insulting/embarrassing as it gets.

21 posted on 03/03/2006 7:22:42 PM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: i_dont_chat

Nah! Clinton is looking forward to being the First Paramour.


22 posted on 03/03/2006 7:23:23 PM PST by oyez (Appeasement is insanity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: i_dont_chat

Interesting take. At best, it's an approach-avoidance conflict, I suspect. ;)


23 posted on 03/03/2006 7:25:54 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Capt. Tom

Your analysis of that photo vis-a-vis my comment is scary.


24 posted on 03/03/2006 7:26:45 PM PST by alancarp (NASCAR: Always turning left, but can never keep up with the Liber-commis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Hillary Clinton Rips Ports Deal

Capitalizing on polls showing widespread opposition to the takeover of six U.S. port operations by Dubai Ports World, Senator Hillary Clinton (D-N.Y.) is expanding her complaint about foreign companies operating in the U.S.

"Allowing businesses headquartered in foreign companies to operate in America is wrong," said Clinton. "It should only be permitted if accompanied by donations that support our electoral processes."

It was Senator Clinton's husband who approved a Chinese company's (Hutchison-Whampoa) purchase of the Panama Canal's two ports. Then-President Bill Clinton brushed aside security concerns. "I knew they were okay when they contributed to my 1996 re-election campaign," said Clinton. "Enemies don't give you money."

Senator Clinton said she has an open mind on the issue and would be willing to withdraw her opposition to the port deal if the United Arab Emirates would demonstrate their support of democracy by contributing to her reelection campaign.

In related news, the William F. Clinton Foundation has posted an Internet job listing for 25 unpaid interns. The text of the ad reads: "Young women with an interest in public service should consider the Clinton Foundation Intern Program. The program offers a unique opportunity to establish an intimate working relationship with an experienced leader and gain first-hand experience handling important issues. Activities will include analyzing public policy issues and dealing with selected members of congress."

Applicants are instructed to send their resumes, photographs and a 250-word essay describing the position they would like to assume in government service.

read more...

http://www.azconservative.org/Semmens1.htm


25 posted on 03/03/2006 7:26:46 PM PST by John Semmens
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

Indeed.


26 posted on 03/03/2006 7:26:53 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten

He doesn't want his wife to eclipse him (or even come close).

Bill would like the mention of Hillary in history to be a small footnote by his name.


27 posted on 03/03/2006 7:27:13 PM PST by i_dont_chat (I defend the right to offend!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Thank you Mia T for tracking this vermin... now if we could only get Drudge to link to your posts.


28 posted on 03/03/2006 7:29:02 PM PST by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

"I DON'T RECALL"

29 posted on 03/03/2006 7:31:10 PM PST by Doogle (USAF...8thAF...4077th TFW...408th MMS...Ubon Thailand..."69"..Night Line Delivery,AMMO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: operation clinton cleanup
thank you :)
30 posted on 03/03/2006 7:31:41 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: i_dont_chat; Mia T

I do agree that they probably hate each other, on some level, but have too much dirt on one another to ever consider divorcing - in that sense they each have a gun to each other's head.

On the other hand, consider LBJ and JFK. No doubt they hated each other as much or more than the contempoary clintons. Yet there is at least a strong suggestion, if not outright evidence that LBJ blackmailed JFK to make him the VP candidate when JFK was all set to pick Symington, I think it was.

Now first husband is not the *same* as being VP, but in some sense it's roughly comparable - your as close to the throne as you can get without being actually on it - I would think that that would be a pretty strong inducement.

What do you think, Mia?


31 posted on 03/03/2006 7:32:35 PM PST by 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten (When Bush says "we mustn't act like clowns," the RATS don their multi-colored wigs and greasepaint.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

I saw ole Dick Morris on O'Reilly tonight...O'Reilly even sounded taken aback by Morris' "revelations" about Clinton...

However, I can't stand Morris...(he also said in the same interview that Bush is LAZY)...and I don't know how much stock we can place in what he says...


32 posted on 03/03/2006 7:37:11 PM PST by Txsleuth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Exactly when did Morris proclaim Clinton an agent of the UAE?


33 posted on 03/03/2006 7:37:51 PM PST by TheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

Isn't the rerun coming up at 11pm eastern?


34 posted on 03/03/2006 7:41:08 PM PST by TheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Cornpone
Cultures that support separation of church and state: Christian

I think that would be more accurate if you said Christians support the separation between ONE church and state. They certainly don't support the total separation of Christian morals and values from the state.

35 posted on 03/03/2006 7:41:36 PM PST by Elyse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Doogle
"I DON'T RECALL"
(THE CLINTONS COMMIT PERJURY WITH IMPUNITY)

36 posted on 03/03/2006 7:42:04 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Mia T


How would Mohammed vote?

Hillary for President in '08.


37 posted on 03/03/2006 7:42:23 PM PST by Tzimisce (How Would Mohammed Vote? Hillary for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

bttt


38 posted on 03/03/2006 7:46:24 PM PST by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheLion

Yes....I am going to watch it again...Morris always makes me so mad...that I only half listen..but, I want to hear again what he says about Clinton and Dubai.

Thanks for reminding me!


39 posted on 03/03/2006 7:48:15 PM PST by Txsleuth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Cornpone

No, there is one more. Ark of Hope.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1578025/posts
Earth Charter and the Ark of Hope - New World Order


40 posted on 03/03/2006 7:48:37 PM PST by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

Thanks, I'll be watching it too!


41 posted on 03/03/2006 7:49:55 PM PST by TheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Elyse; Calpernia
"I think that would be more accurate if you said Christians support the separation between ONE church and state. They certainly don't support the total separation of Christian morals and values from the state."

Actually I think it would have been more accurate had I said Western vice Christian. Western culture is based on the Judeo-Christian ethic but has entered a phase of post-Christian decline. By use of the term Christian I imply a resurgence. Had I used the term Western I think the intent would have been lost. I understand what you are saying though.

42 posted on 03/03/2006 7:52:07 PM PST by Cornpone (Who Dares Wins -- Defame Islam Today -- Tell the Truth About Mohammed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Yup, I was speechless when I heard this.


43 posted on 03/03/2006 7:54:18 PM PST by Chgogal (The US Military fights for Freedom of the Press while the NYT lies about the Military and cowers...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten

I think it's the classic approach-avoidance conflict.
On the one hand, it's the ultimate mulligan. But taking that shot would only underscore HIS utter failure... And then we must consider how he thinks SHE would handle it, knowing full well her propensity for revenge. Seems to me this is a losing proposition for him and he knows it.


44 posted on 03/03/2006 7:56:32 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Chgogal

yeah, like anyone but our talk show guys, FR and various blogs will be talking about this.. MSM will completely ignore it.

i guess that could do it though... what the heck am I thinking.. who the h*ll watches or reads MSM anyway.

I'm still thinking "old school"... I must repeat 1000 times: New Media , New Media, New Media, New Media.....


45 posted on 03/03/2006 7:58:18 PM PST by Chuzzlewit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Mia T; All
It seems to run in his administration. I wrote a limerick about AlGore's similar antics here.

No cheers, unfortunately.

46 posted on 03/03/2006 7:58:59 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Don't be jumping up and down yet. The connection with a senator is a good angle but,Don't be jumping up and down yet.DC is awash with ME lobbyist money.... (yes both sides.)


47 posted on 03/03/2006 8:01:34 PM PST by Walkingfeather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alancarp

He has to guess what's behind burka's 1,2 and 3 (ala Monty Hall) to claim his prize.


48 posted on 03/03/2006 8:02:39 PM PST by synbad600
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: i_dont_chat
Yep...you may be right about Billy being scared to death of Hitlery gaining access to the white house...

He would soon become the White House capon...and she would keep her pet on a very short leash...being in control of the SS and other intel types would be easy for her...lol

Her majesty would not suffer any damage to her public image and you know what they say about a woman scorned...imagine a scorned woman with absolute power....

I think Bill & Ted put it best...Whoooooaaaaa!......

49 posted on 03/03/2006 8:03:11 PM PST by joesnuffy (A camel once bit our sister..but we knew just what to do...we gathered rocks and squashed her!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

excellent ;)


50 posted on 03/03/2006 8:03:52 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200201-215 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson