Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: spunkets
Er, yes. But - where are the other 10^40 left-over superN's?

My hand, about a kg, would need some 10^30 atoms, but (under conventional theory at least) you can't assume that the original superN was exactly symmetrical with our solar system's center of mass.

Or do you have to? Do we have to assume that this superN stayed stable enough long enough at exactly the center of our solar system's cloud - and the observed superN burned out in only a few weeks - to burn enough atoms to form our planets as we know them?

Further, observed supernova's eject matter - far too great a distance (Crab nebula is never going to reform into planets!) for the newly-formed nebula's to re-condense into the same system that they started from.
7 posted on 02/15/2007 5:28:53 PM PST by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Robert A. Cook, PE; All

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/hframe.html

I found it to be a handy link.


31 posted on 02/15/2007 6:07:01 PM PST by neverdem (May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson