Skip to comments.
The Prophet of Garbage
http://www.popsci.com/popsci/science/873aae7bf86c0110vgnvcm1000004eecbccdrcrd.html ^
| March 2007 issue
| Michael Behar
Posted on 02/16/2007 5:07:13 AM PST by Red Badger
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-37 last
To: Red Badger
Does this machine operate on one point twenty-one jigawatts? ;-)
To: Red Badger
"multimillion-dollar system that took Longo almost two decades to design and build."
Not to be a wet blanket, but what kind of maintenance does thing take - how many hours of operation before rebuild/repair/PM? They may wind up building this thing adjacent to an existing landfill, just in case.
If the machine will eat a days worth of garbage, how much land will it take to house the magic machine and how much on site storage should it have?
I enjoy reading these Popular Mechanics level articles, but would like o see more of the detail on the care and feeding. Any additional links?
22
posted on
02/16/2007 8:10:29 AM PST
by
ASOC
(The phrase "What if" or "If only" are for children.)
To: ASOC
23
posted on
02/16/2007 8:20:36 AM PST
by
Red Badger
(Rachel Carson is responsible for more deaths than Adolf Hitler...............)
To: RaceBannon; scoopscandal; 2Trievers; LoneGOPinCT; Rodney King; sorrisi; MrSparkys; monafelice; ...
Connecticut ping!
HOW IT WORKS Startech's trash converter uses superheated plasma to reduce garbage to its molecuar components.
It sounds as if someone just dropped a tricycle into a meat grinder. Im sitting inside a narrow conference room at a research facility in Bristol, Connecticut, chatting with Joseph Longo, the founder and CEO of Startech Environmental Corporation...
Please Freepmail me if you want on or off my infrequent Connecticut ping list.
24
posted on
02/16/2007 8:30:37 AM PST
by
nutmeg
(National Security trumps everything else.)
To: nutmeg
Makes sense -- Bristol invented garbage!
To: nutmeg
So it works on the moonbat principle - put a whole lotta garbage into the head end, get some sort of expulsion out the back end, huh?
26
posted on
02/16/2007 10:01:20 AM PST
by
Andonius_99
(There are two sides to every issue. One is right, the other is wrong; but the middle is always evil.)
To: Vaquero
Beat me to it. Exactly my thought.
To: Andonius_99
So it works on the moonbat principle - put a whole lotta garbage into the head end, get some sort of expulsion out the back end, huh?LOL! ;-D
28
posted on
02/16/2007 4:35:44 PM PST
by
nutmeg
(National Security trumps everything else.)
To: Red Badger
Scale this puppy up!
We need to get dozens of these converters running and start uncovering previously closed landfills.
That would be pure energy profit and the reclamation of currently "dead" land.
29
posted on
02/16/2007 4:47:30 PM PST
by
Dr.Zoidberg
(Mohammedanism - Bringing you only the best of the 6th century for fourteen hundred years.)
To: Berosus; Cincinatus' Wife; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; FairOpinion; Fedora; ..
30
posted on
02/17/2007 8:48:51 PM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(I last updated my profile on Thursday, February 15, 2007. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: SunkenCiv
The Prophet of Garbage
darn it, that headline tricked me, I thought here we go, finally, here's the truth about how the koranimals wrote their book.
31
posted on
02/17/2007 10:13:27 PM PST
by
Fred Nerks
(Read THE LIFE OF MUHAMMAD free pdf download. Link on my bio page.)
To: Red Badger
No way this is going to work. This is an energy loser.
Has anyone stopped to figure out how much energy goes into just PRODUCING garbage?
32
posted on
02/17/2007 10:24:02 PM PST
by
Balding_Eagle
(If America falls, darkness will cover the face of the earth for a thousand years.)
To: Balding_Eagle
The garbage will be produced regardless, and will be hauled to disposal regardless, so, no, it's not an energy loser.
33
posted on
02/18/2007 7:37:45 PM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(I last updated my profile on Thursday, February 15, 2007. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: Balding_Eagle; SunkenCiv
This will recover the energy used (at least partially) to produce the garbage, which is now being "lost" to landfills. It will still be transported, just the same, but can be returned to the "pool" of energy available for use. All energy production is an "energy loser" in some sense, else you'd have a perpetual motion scheme......
34
posted on
02/19/2007 5:06:46 AM PST
by
Red Badger
(Rachel Carson is responsible for more deaths than Adolf Hitler...............)
To: SunkenCiv; Red Badger
That was sarcasm, directed at the ethonal folks.
35
posted on
02/19/2007 7:01:54 AM PST
by
Balding_Eagle
(If America falls, darkness will cover the face of the earth for a thousand years.)
To: Balding_Eagle
Oh, sorry. :') Look, you can't be subtle with me. You have to use something like this:
36
posted on
02/19/2007 9:11:08 AM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(I last updated my profile on Thursday, February 15, 2007. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: Red Badger
Hey wait a minute... are you suggesting that perpetual motion doesn't work?!? What's the meaning of this?!?!
37
posted on
02/19/2007 9:13:13 AM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(I last updated my profile on Thursday, February 15, 2007. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-37 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson