Skip to comments.
Ron Paul, the Real Republican? (Announcing the Great Ron Paul Ping List)
Fox News ^
| February 20, 2007
| Radley Balko
Posted on 02/20/2007 8:59:49 AM PST by OrthodoxPresbyterian
Ron Paul, the Real Republican?
Tuesday, February 20, 2007
By Radley Balko
When you read about a vote in Congress that goes something like 412-1, odds are pretty good that the sole "nay" came from Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas. He so consistently votes against widely popular bills, in fact, that the Washington Post recently gave him the moniker "Congressman 'No.'"
Paul isn't a reflexive contrarian--he doesn't oppose just to oppose. Rather, he has a core set of principles that guide him. They happen to be the same principles envisioned by the framers of the U.S. Constitution: limited government, federalism, free trade and commerce -- with a premium on peace.
When most members of Congress see a bill for the first time, they immediately judge the bill on its merits, or if you're more cynical, they determine what the political interests that support them will think of it, or how it might benefit their constituents.
For Paul, the vast majority of bills don't get that far. He first asks, "Does the Constitution authorize Congress to pass this law?" Most of the time, the answer to that question is "no." And so Paul votes accordingly.
This hasn't won him many friends in Congress, or, for that matter, his own party. It hasn't won him influential committee assignments or powerful chairmanships, either. Those are generally handed out to the party animals who vote as they're told. An incorruptible man of principle in a corrupt body almost utterly devoid of principle, Paul is often a caucus of one.
Paul recently announced his intentions to run for president in 2008. For the few of us who still care about limited government, individual rights, and a sensible foreign policy, Paul's candidacy is terrific news....Continue reading
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: electionpresident; elections; ronpaul; velvetrevolution
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-100, 101-150, 151-200 ... 551-591 next last
RON PAUL is the RIGHT Candidate for Pro-Life social conservatives.
- Ron Paul introduced the Sanctity of Life Act of 2005, recognizing the Personhood of every unborn baby and removing Abortion from the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court. ("THE RIGHT TO LIFE ACT OF 2005 Lacks Vital Language").
- Ron Paul is rated ZERO percent by the National Abortion Rights Action League.
- Ron Paul is an original co-sponsor of the Marriage Protection Act.
- Ron Paul voted to ban Homosexual adoption in Washington DC.
RON PAUL is the RIGHT Candidate for Tax-Cutting fiscal conservatives.
- Ron Paul is ranked by Human Events as the biggest Tax Cutter in all of Congress. Paul Named #1 Tax Cutter in Congress: (Paul) is a co-sponsor
of a constitutional amendment to repeal the 16th amendment and end income, gift, and estate taxes. Regularly pushes for tax cuts. Sponsor of bills to allow tax credits for private school tuition, to permit tax deduction of college tuition, and to stop all taxation of Social Security benefits. Opposes all unconstitutional spending programs.
- Ron Paul has placed either 1st or 2nd in the National Taxpayer Union rankings every year he has been in Congress -- thus standing head and shoulders above his big government Republican rivals like gun-grabber John McCain, transvestite Rudy Giuliani, "Amnesty Sam" Brownback, Mike "Bill Clinton embodies the American Dream" Huckabee, and Pork-Barrel King Duncan Hunter (whose abysmal 52% rating from the National Taxpayer's Union is actually bringing the average Republican score in the loose-spending House down).
RON PAUL is the ONLY 100% Anti-Terrorist candidate.
- The ruling government of Iraq is dominated by the psychopathic gang of murderers known as the Supreme Council for the Islamic Revolution in Iraq (SCIRI) and the Islamic Al Dawa Party, who are the very same Islamic Terrorist Parties which bombed the US & French Embassies in Kuwait and murdered 241 United States Marines in Beirut in 1983. Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, of the Al Dawa Party, was the Al Dawa bureau chief in Damascus in the 1980s and was thus heavily responsible for Al Dawa operations in Beirut, while parliament member Jamal Jafaar Mohammed of his ruling coalition is one of the "Kuwait 17", still under a Kuwaiti death sentence (in absentia) for his direct involvement in the vicious attack on the US Embassy in Kuwait! Ron Paul is the ONLY candidate calling for an immediate END to all Military and Financial support for the criminal Islamic Terrorist thug-regime of Iraq.
RON PAUL is the RIGHT Candidate for National Defense and Foreign Affairs.
- Ron Paul voted for the National Missile Defense Act. source
- Ron Paul is one of only two co-sponsors of H. Res. 123, for the establishment of a Select Committee on POW/MIA Affairs to "conduct a full investigation of all unresolved matters relating to any United States personnel unaccounted for from the Vietnam era, the Korean conflict, World War II, Cold War Missions, or Gulf War, including MIA's and POW's." (POW-MIA InterNetwork)
- Ron Paul supports a strengthened Coast Guard and increased port security, and increased benefits for veterans.
- Ron Paul advocates United States withdrawal from the United Nations and withdrawal from the World Trade Organization. Says Ron Paul: "We dont need CAFTA or any other international agreement to reap the economic benefits promised by CAFTA supporters, we only need to change our own harmful economic and tax policies. Let the rest of the world hurt their citizens with tariffs; if we simply reduce tariffs and taxes at home, we will attract capital and see our economy flourish." (source).
RON PAUL is the RIGHT Candidate for the Bill of Rights.
RON PAUL is the RIGHT Candidate on Illegal Immigration.
- Ron Paul voted for the Secure Fence Act of 2006. Amnesty for lawbreakers is not the answer, and its time to rethink birthright citizenship, Paul added. ("Paul Votes for Stronger Border Security")
- Ron Paul is a co-sponsor of HR 487, which "expresses the sense of Congress that the United States should not engage in the construction of a NAFTA superhighway or enter into any plans to create a North American Union between Canada, the U.S., and Mexico."
- "We need to allocate far more resources, both in terms of money and manpower, to securing our borders and coastlines here at home. This is the most critical task before us, both in terms of immigration problems and the threat of foreign terrorists. Unless and until we secure our borders, illegal immigration and the problems associated with it will only increase." Ron Paul (source)
RON PAUL is the ONLY socially-conservative Candidate defending the independence of the Christian Church from Federal "Faith-Based Socialism".
- "Government funding of religious organizations will transform them into adjuncts of the federal welfare state, more concerned about obeying federal rules and regulations than fulfilling the obligations of their faith." Ron Paul (source). Every other so-called "social conservative" candidate actually FAVORS this underhanded Orwellian Federal assault on the Freedom of the Christian Church.
RON PAUL. The RIGHT Candidate for a FREE Republic.
Please let me know if you would like to be added to the
Great Ron Paul Ping List (GRPPL), already developing support on the Free Republic Religion Forum.
To: Gamecock; elkfersupper; dcwusmc; gnarledmaw; Extremely Extreme Extremist; KoRn; traviskicks; ...
Ron Paul for President! (Ping to current GRPPL members)
2
posted on
02/20/2007 9:00:38 AM PST
by
OrthodoxPresbyterian
(We are Unworthy Servants; We have only done Our Duty -- Luke 17:10)
To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
Ron Paul should be the rule, not the execption.
3
posted on
02/20/2007 9:01:36 AM PST
by
isthisnickcool
(Have a nice day. Durka durka durka...)
To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
Gag, Ron Paul is a member of the surrender lobby, as a Reaganite I will look elsewhere, thanks.
4
posted on
02/20/2007 9:02:09 AM PST
by
Patrick1
To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
Note: The source in the "Pro-Life" section refers to Duncan Hunter's flawed "Right to Life Act", in contrast to Ron Paul's better-written "Sanctity of Life Act".
5
posted on
02/20/2007 9:02:38 AM PST
by
OrthodoxPresbyterian
(We are Unworthy Servants; We have only done Our Duty -- Luke 17:10)
To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
Ron Paul turned his back on the troops.
6
posted on
02/20/2007 9:03:22 AM PST
by
bnelson44
(Proud parent of a tanker! (Elections have repercussions, you reap what you sow.))
To: Patrick1
The ruling
government of Iraq is dominated by the psychopathic gang of murderers known as the Supreme Council for the Islamic Revolution in Iraq (SCIRI) and the Islamic Al Dawa Party, who are
the very same Islamic Terrorist Parties which bombed the US & French Embassies in Kuwait and murdered 241 United States Marines in Beirut in 1983. Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, of the Al Dawa Party, was the Al Dawa bureau chief in Damascus in the 1980s and was thus heavily responsible for Al Dawa operations in Beirut, while parliament member Jamal Jafaar Mohammed of his ruling coalition is one of the "Kuwait 17",
still under a Kuwaiti death sentence (
in absentia) for his direct involvement in the vicious attack on the US Embassy in Kuwait!
Ron Paul is the ONLY candidate calling for an immediate END to all Military and Financial support for the criminal Islamic Terrorist thug-regime of Iraq.
7
posted on
02/20/2007 9:03:41 AM PST
by
OrthodoxPresbyterian
(We are Unworthy Servants; We have only done Our Duty -- Luke 17:10)
To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
Ron Paul
voted with the Democrats on the "non-binding resolution" on Iraq.
He is political "dead meat" as far as I'm concerned.
Were you aware of this and didn't give a hoot or are you just pushing damaged goods?
8
posted on
02/20/2007 9:03:42 AM PST
by
capt. norm
(Liberalism = cowardice disguised as tolerance.)
To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
Please add me to your Ron Paul ping list.
9
posted on
02/20/2007 9:04:12 AM PST
by
M203M4
To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
An incorruptible man of principle Except, of course, when it means keeping his word on term limits.
Then he reveals himself to be as corruptible as any member of Congress.
To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
Ron Paul is anything but a Republican.
If anything, he is a traditional Whig but he does not even meet those criteria.
He is a Libertarian by most modern standards, and a royal pain in the arse.
To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
While Ron Paultalks a great game, his recent vote in favor of the Democrat's abandon-the-troops-in-Iraq bill causes me to differ.
His vote against reinforcement of the troops will get good men killed in Iraq and gave aid and comfort to the terrorists.
Ergo, Ron Paul is an evil little man, not worthy of respect, regardless of his great speeches.
12
posted on
02/20/2007 9:05:45 AM PST
by
MeanWestTexan
(Kol Hakavod Lezahal)
To: bnelson44; capt. norm
Ron Paul turned his back on the troops.He did NO such thing. Ron Paul is the ONLY Republican candidate who wants to get our troops out of harm's way and home to their families, by ending all Military and Financial support for the criminal Islamic Terrorist regime of Iraq.
The ruling government of Iraq is dominated by the psychopathic gang of murderers known as the Supreme Council for the Islamic Revolution in Iraq (SCIRI) and the Islamic Al Dawa Party, who are the very same Islamic Terrorist Parties which bombed the US & French Embassies in Kuwait and murdered 241 United States Marines in Beirut in 1983. Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, of the Al Dawa Party, was the Al Dawa bureau chief in Damascus in the 1980s and was thus heavily responsible for Al Dawa operations in Beirut, while parliament member Jamal Jafaar Mohammed of his ruling coalition is one of the "Kuwait 17", still under a Kuwaiti death sentence (in absentia) for his direct involvement in the vicious attack on the US Embassy in Kuwait! Ron Paul is the ONLY candidate calling for an immediate END to all Military and Financial support for the criminal Islamic Terrorist thug-regime of Iraq.
Ron Paul: the Right Candidate for Our Troops. Bring 'em home alive, Ron!
13
posted on
02/20/2007 9:06:32 AM PST
by
OrthodoxPresbyterian
(We are Unworthy Servants; We have only done Our Duty -- Luke 17:10)
To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
I'd like to see Ron Paul as President, but I'd accept him as Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, too.
14
posted on
02/20/2007 9:06:36 AM PST
by
mysterio
To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
And whether someone stabs our fighting men in the back out of principle or for money, I don't much care what motivated him to become evil.
Ron Paul is still a contemptible scumbag.
To: wideawake
He kept his word on term limits during his first stint in Congress.
Rightly or wrongly, though, term limits have turned into a dead letter issue since his re-election to Congress.
16
posted on
02/20/2007 9:08:51 AM PST
by
OrthodoxPresbyterian
(We are Unworthy Servants; We have only done Our Duty -- Luke 17:10)
To: wideawake
"And whether someone stabs our fighting men in the back out of principle or for money, I don't much care what motivated him to become evil."
A great example of C.S. Lewis's thesis that the exaggeration and single mindedness of almost any good quality, above all other, eventually becomes evil.
17
posted on
02/20/2007 9:08:56 AM PST
by
MeanWestTexan
(Kol Hakavod Lezahal)
To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
Ron Paul is the ONLY Republican candidate who wants to get our troops out of harm's way and home to their familiesIn other words, he wants to cut and run.
Nice rhetoric.
When the primary returns start coming in for Paul, you should shop your resume to the Obama campaign - or to the Hugo Chavez campaign if he decides to go through the charade of running again.
To: Cold Heat
Ron Paul is anything but a Republican. If anything, he is a traditional Whig but he does not even meet those criteria. He is a Libertarian by most modern standards, and a royal pain in the arse.To all advocates of Big Government, he sure is!
19
posted on
02/20/2007 9:10:20 AM PST
by
OrthodoxPresbyterian
(We are Unworthy Servants; We have only done Our Duty -- Luke 17:10)
To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
I got to admit that I like him on most issues but then he went and stood with the Democrats on the "surrender" vote. He may have had his own reasons but he still let himself be counted for their argument. I can't forgive that.
20
posted on
02/20/2007 9:10:37 AM PST
by
Gator101
To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
Ron Paul: the Right Candidate for Our Troops. Bring 'em home alive, Ron!You and Hillary, Kerry, Kennedy, Edwards and Obama share the same view.
It's not a view widely shared on this forum>
We want them to come home in victory and not with their "tails between their legs" like the returning vets from Vietnam had to endure.
21
posted on
02/20/2007 9:10:37 AM PST
by
capt. norm
(Liberalism = cowardice disguised as tolerance.)
To: wideawake
Thankfully he has absolutely no chance of ever being President of the United States.
22
posted on
02/20/2007 9:10:44 AM PST
by
Patrick1
To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
LOL!
He's still in Congress!
Rightly or wrongly, though, term limits have turned into a dead letter issue since his re-election to Congress.
So, in other words, term limits were important to him once, but not important anymore now that he's exceeded his own original term limit promise.
To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
"Does the Constitution authorize Congress to pass this law?" Most of the time, the answer to that question is "no." And so Paul votes accordingly.
Indeed.
24
posted on
02/20/2007 9:11:26 AM PST
by
WhiteGuy
(GOP Congress - 16,000 earmarks costing US $50 billion in 2006 - PAUL2008)
To: Patrick1
Reagan pulled the marines out of Lebanon. Do you think he'd be stil be in Iraq?
25
posted on
02/20/2007 9:11:34 AM PST
by
jd777
To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
No doubt Ron Paul is fantastic. What we love about him is what makes him so unelectable though. Imagining what a RP presidency would look like sure makes me smile.
26
posted on
02/20/2007 9:11:36 AM PST
by
Clump
(Your family may not be safe, but at least their library records will be.)
To: wideawake
"In other words, he wants to cut and run."
Yep. If he truly wanted to help the troops, he would help them get the job done, not stab them in the back and give a propaganda victory to the mullahs.
Ron Paul is worse than the Murtha Democrats, because Ron Paul knows better.
27
posted on
02/20/2007 9:11:58 AM PST
by
MeanWestTexan
(Kol Hakavod Lezahal)
To: Clump
"Imagining what a RP presidency would look like sure makes me smile."
Makes the terrorists smile, too.
28
posted on
02/20/2007 9:12:46 AM PST
by
MeanWestTexan
(Kol Hakavod Lezahal)
To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
Historically, with one exception, American's don't elect congress critters to be president.
You may be wasting bandwidth - but he is a better choice than ole Rudy.
29
posted on
02/20/2007 9:13:07 AM PST
by
WorkerbeeCitizen
(Religion of peace my arse - We need a maintenance Crusade - piss on Islam)
To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
Put me on the ping list. Paul is da man!
To: Patrick1
Gag, Ron Paul is a member of the surrender lobby Ron Paul wants Saddam back in power. Too bad for Ron.
31
posted on
02/20/2007 9:13:11 AM PST
by
Phlap
(REDNECK@LIBARTS.EDU)
To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
Wow I had not idea that Paul supported some of these! (though I should have guessed), (most of the time I hear: R. Paul supports, this or that, but I don't hear the reason behind it..I am becoming more a Ron Paul fan EVERY day)..! I could vote for him.
32
posted on
02/20/2007 9:13:27 AM PST
by
JSDude1
(www.pence08.com.)
To: wideawake; MeanWestTexan
In other words, he wants to cut and run.One question -- Yes, or No:
Now that Saddam Hussein is DEAD, do you believe that the Federal Government should spend hundreds of billions of dollars and thousands of American Lives to provide military and financial support to a Government dominated by convicted Islamic Terrorists who attacked our Embassies and murdered hundreds of United States Marines in cold blood?
Yes, or No?
33
posted on
02/20/2007 9:13:45 AM PST
by
OrthodoxPresbyterian
(We are Unworthy Servants; We have only done Our Duty -- Luke 17:10)
To: Patrick1
"Gag, Ron Paul is a member of the surrender lobby," You got that right!
Ron Paul is a cut and run coward.
34
posted on
02/20/2007 9:15:13 AM PST
by
lormand
(Michael Wiener - the tough talking populist moron, who claims to be a Conservative)
To: MeanWestTexan
You're right. Paul knows better. He knew back in 2002 that starry-eyed predictions that Iraqis would embrace liberty and democracy, that the war "would pay for itself" via Iraqi oil, that the other dominoes would soon fall for liberty, etc. were nonsense. He knew that this would be a ntion-building, Wilsonian quagmire, long before others did.
To: capt. norm; Phlap
One question -- Yes, or No:
Now that Saddam Hussein is DEAD, do you believe that the Federal Government should spend hundreds of billions of dollars and thousands of American Lives to provide military and financial support to a Government dominated by convicted Islamic Terrorists who attacked our Embassies and murdered hundreds of United States Marines in cold blood?
Yes, or No?
36
posted on
02/20/2007 9:15:37 AM PST
by
OrthodoxPresbyterian
(We are Unworthy Servants; We have only done Our Duty -- Luke 17:10)
To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
Intrigued...please add me to the GRPPL!
Thanks~
keeper
37
posted on
02/20/2007 9:15:57 AM PST
by
keeper53
( "He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose." Jim Elliot)
To: lormand
38
posted on
02/20/2007 9:16:06 AM PST
by
OrthodoxPresbyterian
(We are Unworthy Servants; We have only done Our Duty -- Luke 17:10)
To: jd777; Patrick1
Reagan pulled the marines out of Lebanon.And we've been paying for Reagan's greatest mistake - i.e. sending a message of capitulatory weakness to Islamists -ever since.
To: wideawake
Then he reveals himself to be as corruptible as any member of Congress.
really?
as corrupt as duke cunningham?
40
posted on
02/20/2007 9:16:14 AM PST
by
WhiteGuy
(GOP Congress - 16,000 earmarks costing US $50 billion in 2006 - PAUL2008)
To: jd777
I think Ronald Reagan would have killed a lot more Islamists than George Bush has by now. But compared to Ron Paul, George Bush is Lincoln. Ron Paul wouldn't defend the country if the Islamists were marching down Pennsylvania Avenue.
41
posted on
02/20/2007 9:16:52 AM PST
by
Patrick1
To: JSDude1
Wow I had not idea that Paul supported some of these! The one thing Ron Paul doesn't support is our troops in harms way.M
His vote (with the Democrats) on the "non-binding resolution" was a slap in the face for the troops and very encouraging to the enemy.
Do you actually favor the resolution....or just the turn-coat who aided and abetted the bad guys?
42
posted on
02/20/2007 9:16:55 AM PST
by
capt. norm
(Liberalism = cowardice disguised as tolerance.)
To: capt. norm
Ron Paul has the same position on national security as Hillary Clinton. No one who calls themselves a conservative could vote for him.
43
posted on
02/20/2007 9:17:57 AM PST
by
Patrick1
To: Austin Willard Wright
You're on. Every one who wants in gets a piece of the action. I'll be reviewing this thread for supporters and signing up everyone who has asked to be on the list.
In addition, I am in regular contact with the Campaign and will be passing along info regarding the State Campaign chairs you can contact as soon as they become available.
44
posted on
02/20/2007 9:18:14 AM PST
by
OrthodoxPresbyterian
(We are Unworthy Servants; We have only done Our Duty -- Luke 17:10)
To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
a Government dominated by convicted Islamic Terrorists Yawn.
Which convicted terrorists from the Embassy bombings are currently serving in the Iraqi Parliament or Administration?
Just list their names, their government position, and the charges they've been convicted of.
Thanks in advance.
To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
You are suffering from a liberal kool-aid overdose.
46
posted on
02/20/2007 9:18:58 AM PST
by
capt. norm
(Liberalism = cowardice disguised as tolerance.)
To: lormand
Cutless coward=politicians. Ron Paul is a man of principle, not a politician, and thus the opposite of a gutless coward.
To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
You should work for national polling firms, who stack question in such a way as to get the desired response from the questioner.
48
posted on
02/20/2007 9:19:20 AM PST
by
lormand
(Michael Wiener - the tough talking populist moron, who claims to be a Conservative)
To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
Ron Paul is truly a decent man. However, I strongly disagree with him on his Iraq vote. I realize that a candidate cannot give you everything that I want, but -to me- he just made a mistake on the most important issue of our time.
49
posted on
02/20/2007 9:19:24 AM PST
by
Bishop_Malachi
(Liberal Socialism - A philosophy which advocates spreading a low standard of living equally.)
To: capt. norm; OrthodoxPresbyterian
When that SOB Ron Paul comes to my home state of Texas, he's going to get an earful from me. I along with others are going to vote that moth*****er out of office!
50
posted on
02/20/2007 9:19:41 AM PST
by
USMMA_83
(Tantra is my fetish ;))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-100, 101-150, 151-200 ... 551-591 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson