[Brian Mosely]

Globally, at least 350 million couples lack family planning services. Here in the United States, one-third of all births are unplanned. And the Bush administration’s family-planning failures, from its global gag rule against abortion to ideologically driven abstinence-only programs, contribute directly to millions of unwanted and unplanned births. If we could cut in half the number of unwanted births in the U.S. alone, we’d have about 5 million fewer births over 20 years.

Perhaps Seager should have titled this: "Fight Global Warming through More Abortions"

[big'ol_freeper]

Eliminate all the liberals. Problem solved.

[Wally_Kalbacken]

If we could just kill the 300 million inhabitants of the United States we could save 25% of global energy consumption.

[gotribe]

And why can't Mr. Seager and others do the brave thing and take their own lives to spare us global warming? We could plant trees in their memory.

[D.P.Roberts]

It must be terrible to have every little kooky idea you ever heard of tying in with every other one in your head like that.

[Doogle]

[Sherman Logan]

This is so 1970s. Every single industrial country is near or below replacement birth rates, many far below.

The only way to stop the growth of population in the next 40 years or so in these countries is to kill a bunch of people.

[edpc]

Family planning makes sense for people – and for our fragile planet.

I'm sure he's doing his part. I seriously doubt this dude is getting laid.

[claptrap]

More unassailable factoids from some Infertility Cult?

[Always Right]

I wish liberals would take their own advice and stop reproducing. They should just neuter themselves as soon as they discover they are liberals. I mean if they were really serious about these problems.

[LibKill]

Isn't this the complete butthead who said something to the effect that it was better to kill a human (baby?) than an animal?

About ten years ago or so.

[Ron/GA]

The author is obviously unaware that the developed world as a whole is already at zero growth and sliding into negative numbers. If if weren't for the bleed-off of folks from the undeveloped world into the developed world, those numbers would be ringing alarm bells.

When you factor in the dramatic increases in efficiency that we are already seeing, efficiencies that will only accelerate in the near future, the developed world is not the problem. He needs to be addressing his concerns to China, India, Pakistan, Indonesia, etc., etc.

While not politically correct and certainly not easier in terms of getting the mainstream media to hang on to every word, it would be less of a waste of his time ... and ours.

[Son House]

Gore could cut his carbon emission down by having
his children deemed 'wards of the state'.
Than the state could raise taxes to puchase more
carbon offsets for the wards.

[Quick or Dead]

It’s time to open a “second front” in the battle against global warming by stressing the need for population stabilization, sooner rather than later.

Replace "global warming" with "dwindling food supply and you have a Neo-Malthusian (too many people, not enough food, something's got to give).

These efforts are especially important here in the United States, where less than 5 percent of the world’s population produces about 25 percent of the world’s carbon-dioxide emissions. But cutting energy consumption must be coupled with stabilizing population.

Sell China and India on cutting energy consumption first. Oh right, they don't have to, seeing as how they were tyrannized by the EVIL imperialist powers. *gag*

More people use more energy. If we had zero population growth, part of the global warming problem would, well, melt away.

That is an excellent point Mr.Seager. I suggest that you volunteer to have your energy consumption cut down to zero immediately. That means caves and sharpened rocks for you.

[xcamel]

FReepmail me to get on or off

Click graphic for full GW rundown

Ping me if you find one I've missed.

---

"eugenics is ugly"

[Ramius]

Having read Steyn's book... this guy has no idea what he's talking about. Really clueless.

[AmericaUnited]

Perhaps Seager could lead his follows to 'Seagertown' and start chugging down the Koolaid to do their part in lightening the load...

[Nitro]

Even if this could work.........

it might be a better idea to kill the parents...

why waste a kid who might have the right idea?

[goldstategop]

At heart, libs are misanthropes. They hate humanity, they hate the unborn and they hate free individuals. "Global Warming" here is simply political cover designed to justify that most repulsive of liberal creeds: abortion on demand. I know they are eager to abort themselves out of existence. I wouldn't mind seeing the liberals become extinct but not if they destroyed our civilization in the bargain.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

[AmericaUnited]

Where's the quote from that 'famous' evironalmentalist that said 1 billion people needed to be 'eliminated' to stabilize the planet? These people and their earth worship religion always see man as some form of blight, rather than the crowning achievement of creation.

[Rembrandt_fan]

I've been trying to get my head around this whole global warming thing; more specifically, I've trying to figure out how and when weather was politicized, and why. The population explosion is, of course, a lie: soylent green hasn't become people just yet. The fact that climate is cyclical, changing over time, is true--we are, after all, inhabiting a ball of matter coursing through a hostile universe. Nothing remains the same for long, especially the weather. It remains to be seen, though, to what extent humankind is effecting this cycle. While no scientist, I'm betting humankind isn't having much effect, if any.

The point, I think, is to manufacture a global threat requiring a global response. If it wasn't global warming, or overpopulation, or a hole in the ozone layer, or a scarcity of some vital resource, something would come along to suit the needs of those promoting global catastrophe. The nature of this highly unlikely apocalypse doesn't really matter. It's the reaction to the threat that counts, since a response to a global threat would, of course, require global administration, coordination, and a measure of authority. From the perspective of those creating this perception of imminent danger, a series of treaties encroaching on the national sovereignty of the participating nation-states would do nicely...as a start.

It sounds like tinfoil hat stuff, I know, but it strikes me as the most plausible explanation. Besides, someone has to explain the prominence and popularity of Al Gore. Global conspiracy seems the only explanation for that, too.