Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Boston Globe: GOP all Weak Candidates, Dems "strongest in decades" (more Obama gushing)
NewsBusters.org ^ | 2/26/07 | Warner Todd Huston

Posted on 02/26/2007 6:57:37 AM PST by Mobile Vulgus

Without a hint of balance, Robert Kuttner of the Boston Globe thinks he has it all figured out -- 20 months before the election -- that the GOP candidates cannot win, while the Dems are the right ticket as he tries Taking stock of the 2008 field.

Naturally, his is another gusher for Barack Obama. But, he starts his piece in one way or another ripping each and every one of the GOP candidates, or those who would vote for them, before saying how "strong" the Dems field of candidates is.

Here are the results of his analyzing of the GOP field:

McCain – “...has lately emerged as more hawkish than the president himself. But by primary season, the war may be even more unpopular, and most Republicans will be distancing themselves from the Iraq mess, not urging its escalation.”

Giuliani – “...far too forthright ...”

Romney – “...is also on the defensive as a Mormon, since many fundamentalists don't consider Mormons Christians. Almost half a century after the civil rights revolution, this should not matter, but that's right-wing politics for you.”

And...

Of the also-rans, Senator Sam Brownback, a Kansas fundamentalist, is unlikely to travel well. Mike Huckabee, the former governor of Arkansas, has likewise failed to take off. And Senator Chuck Hagel of Nebraska, a traditional conservative, would make a good president; but he's too vocal a critic of the president to be forgiven by loyalists.

Arnold Schwarzenegger is constitutionally disqualified as foreign-born. Jeb Bush might be plausible if his name were anything other than Bush. An oft-mentioned long shot, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, has never run for office.

Why Arnold was even mentioned is a mystery. His candidacy is a Constitutional impossibility. And it was nice how he just called every Republican voter a bigot.

So, none of them can win. But wait, Kuttner is sure the entire GOP, not just this crop of candidates, is sunk.

And it gets worse. The Bush administration has collapsed on so many fronts that Republican officeholders up for re election will be torn between saving their own necks and remaining loyal to the hard-core base. Eight or nine Republican Senate seats could be at risk.
So much for the evil GOP. Now the sunshine beams, the flowers open, and the birds start singing...
I have followed politics far too long to fall in love, but Obama is like nothing we have seen since Bobby Kennedy and maybe since FDR. If you haven't read his first book, "Dreams from My Father," you owe it to yourself.
It's telling that with his rhapsodizing -- but he ain't in love, truly he ain't -- Kuttner pushes Barack's book. Curiously, it isn't his latest book, the dry and empty "The Audacity of Hope" the book that is supposed to present the candidate in the serious light in which he wants to be seen, but the far older and better book "Dreams of my Father".

The older book is one that presents a far different man, one full of ideas, candid reflection, and hope. Sadly, the newer one reveals a man who has gone bland and become but a calculating politician, a sad shadow of his earlier self.

Obviously Kuttner doesn't want to sully the man he says he doesn't love by present his latest work by which voters might judge him.

Kuttner... again in his show of non-love... then ridiculously equates Obama as someone on the level of a Martin Luther King, Jr. or a Vaclav Havel. And, reaching for the height of absurdity, he then imagines Obama to be just like Thomas Jefferson. Yet, any perusal of these three men’s lives would show far more accomplishment, that they are men of far more consequence than Obama’s life has yet revealed. Obama appears as but a mere dabbler in achievement compared to Kuttner’s three men of history.

No, Kuttner hasn't fallen in love with Obama at all. You can REALLY tell that!

The syrup virtually drips from his pen.

Finally, Kuttner ends his piece with this laugher:

I could be wrong, of course. John Edwards, with his authentic populism, would also make a formidable nominee. Clinton, despite her flaws, has always done better than her detractors predict.
“Authentic populism”? John Edwards!? The man who owns HOW many palatial homes is an example of “authentic populism”?

Yeah, Bobbie, you "could be wrong", indeed.

This guy is killin’ me.

Sadly, this is what passes for serious commentary in Boston.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bostonglobe; elections; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: Mobile Vulgus
Of the also-rans, Senator Sam Brownback, a Kansas fundamentalist, is unlikely to travel well.

Dundamentalist? Brownback is just your run of the mill observant Catholic, of course to the Boston Globe that's as exotic as a three headed freak.

21 posted on 02/26/2007 8:37:49 AM PST by NeoCaveman (Hillary Hugo Chavez wants to "take those profits" away from you, for the common good)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rob Bishop

Chuck Hagel is DOA on the national scene. Stick a fork in him, he's done.


22 posted on 02/26/2007 8:39:23 AM PST by DarthVader (Conservatives aren't always right , but Liberals are almost always wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: dighton

Oh yeah.


23 posted on 02/26/2007 8:48:04 AM PST by pissant (http://www.gohunter08.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus

>> I have followed politics far too long to fall in love, but Obama is like nothing we have seen since...

Where's the V-Chip when you need it.


24 posted on 02/26/2007 8:53:15 AM PST by Gene Eric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus

Kuttner is a socialist wanker pretending to be an economist..... the idea that he is an "objective" and "expert" analyst on the political prospects of potential presidential nominees of either party is too ludicrous to laugh about.


25 posted on 02/26/2007 8:53:44 AM PST by Enchante (Chamberlain Democrats embraced by terrorists and America-haters worldwide!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus
"DEMS STRONGEST IN DECADES"

I agree. The smell is overpowering.

26 posted on 02/26/2007 9:36:36 AM PST by Migraine (...diversity is great (until it happens to you)...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus

What a load of utter nonsense! Obama a strong candidate? Puh-leeze.


27 posted on 02/26/2007 9:38:08 AM PST by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus
Yeah, another nutter piece by Kuttner that rightly belongs in the gutter.
28 posted on 02/26/2007 9:44:12 AM PST by daviscupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus
Now the sunshine beams, the flowers open, and the birds start singing...

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

29 posted on 02/26/2007 9:45:24 AM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Good night Chesty, wherever you are!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: politicalwit
The Globe is stating the obvious.

The Glob is full of feces as usual. First of all, most conservatives don't give a rip about Romney's religion (who's the strongest of the big three, IMO). The only people making it an issue is the lamestream media.

Second of all, candidates like Hunter and Tancredo, and possibly Governors Gilmore and Thompson will heat up in the polls as conservatives will reject Rudy & McCain's liberal records.

I think we got a good crop of Republican candidates here. The Dim candidates are all weak, which is why the media always stick its nose into Republican Party politics all the time.

30 posted on 02/26/2007 9:49:04 AM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Good night Chesty, wherever you are!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: CommerceComet
Ironically, the consensus top two candidates are the two weakest general election candidates. Richardson, Edwards, Gore (if he decides to run) would all be harder to beat in the general election than either Hillary or Obama. What I meant was the field is so strong because both parties are running democrats.
31 posted on 02/26/2007 10:37:43 AM PST by Rob Bishop (Revereradio.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC
Sadly, I agree with the observation.

Have you lost your mind? You think Hillary is the strongest Dem "in decades?"
32 posted on 02/26/2007 10:40:05 AM PST by Vision ("Delight yourself in the Lord; and he will give you your heart's desires." Psalm 37:4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
"I think we got a good crop of Republican candidates here."

I can only shake my head. Does the RNC give you a choice in the favor of Koolaide they serve up?

BTW...I lived in both NH and MA. I know the reputation of the Globe and for once they got something correct.

33 posted on 02/26/2007 11:15:09 AM PST by politicalwit (Freedom doesn't mean a Free Pass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus
Maybe so, but I have to agree with the Globe. The Dems are at the strongest and I think Obama can INCREASE democratic power by a factor of 4. I think the republican congressional loss is still in effect until election season is over...
34 posted on 02/27/2007 4:18:09 AM PST by X-Ecutioner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Believe what I say! Obama will become maybe one of the MOST POWERFUL men in American history. Yall need to be ready for America's FIRST black king......
35 posted on 02/27/2007 4:26:38 AM PST by X-Ecutioner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson