Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Agreement allows U.S. presence in Sadr City
Chicago Tribune ^ | March 4 2007 | Liz Sly

Posted on 03/04/2007 12:29:02 AM PST by jmc1969

The U.S. military has reached an agreement with representatives of the Shiite community in Baghdad's Sadr City enclave that will allow American forces to maintain a permanent presence in the militia stronghold for the first time since 2004, U.S. and Iraqi officials said Saturday.

Under the agreement, the U.S. will open one of the joint security stations that are a prominent feature of the new Baghdad security plan, living alongside Iraqi forces in a police station just inside the impoverished neighborhood, said Rahim al-Daraji, one of Sadr City's two mayors.

But there is still some uncertainty about the degree to which U.S. forces at the combat outpost will be welcome to move freely around the neighborhood, the scene of two fierce battles in 2004 between the U.S. and the Mahdi Army militia headed by anti-American cleric al-Sadr.

Al-Daraji said the deal means U.S. forces will man checkpoints, conduct raids and mount patrols in conjunction with Iraqi forces throughout Sadr City, just as they are doing elsewhere in Baghdad. It is expected they will move into the station by mid-March, said al-Daraji, an independent politician who has been negotiating with U.S. officials on ways to secure the entry of American forces into the neighborhood since late January.

Maj. Steven Lamb, a military spokesman in Baghdad, declined to discuss details of the upcoming deployment and said there are still some specifics to be worked out.

"Things are looking very favorable," he said. "I can say that the Sadr City people are very welcoming to us at this time."

He wouldn't say how many soldiers will eventually move into Sadr City, but according to a U.S. military statement, troops are preparing for a "significantly increased presence" in the 6-square-mile district of 2 million people.

(Excerpt) Read more at kansascity.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: baghdad; baghdadsurge; iraq; iraqsurge

1 posted on 03/04/2007 12:29:07 AM PST by jmc1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jmc1969
The surge is working!!!
2 posted on 03/04/2007 12:33:33 AM PST by airborne ("Why in the hell are we so asfraid of being what we are?" HUNTER 2008!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmc1969
Agreement allows U.S. presence in Sadr City

Mighty white of 'em.

Regards.

3 posted on 03/04/2007 12:47:14 AM PST by ARE SOLE (Agents Ramos and Campean are in prison at this very moment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ARE SOLE

They are going to try to do what they did to us in 2004. Wait until we draw down below a certain point and then attack. That is why we should move Kurdish and Sunni troops in large numbers into the city by the Summer.


4 posted on 03/04/2007 12:59:04 AM PST by jmc1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ARE SOLE

Perhaps the agreement was "You let us in and we won't have to blast our way in."


5 posted on 03/04/2007 7:23:21 AM PST by festus (The constitution may be flawed but its a whole lot better than what we have now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jmc1969
They are going to try to do what they did to us in 2004. Wait until we draw down below a certain point and then attack. That is why we should move Kurdish and Sunni troops in large numbers into the city by the Summer.

Moving Kurdish and Sunni troops into the area would make things a lot worse for everybody.
6 posted on 03/04/2007 11:09:17 AM PST by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: airborne
This agreement is not a sign of anything positive for US. We should not have to be signing stinking agreements with anyone in a war, especially the Iranian backed shiites in SadCity.

The only agreement should be one of unconditional surrender they sign over to American Forces.

More games and hoops our troops have to play and jump through in addition to fighting a war. We bomb Sadr City for 48 hours and they will beg us to tell them what we want them to do

Tagline...
7 posted on 03/04/2007 6:04:45 PM PST by TomasUSMC ( FIGHT LIKE WW2, FINISH LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TomasUSMC

While I agree with your post, I still believe the surge is working.

Which is why the media isn't covering it.


8 posted on 03/05/2007 12:15:44 PM PST by airborne ("Why in the hell are we so asfraid of being what we are?" HUNTER 2008!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: airborne

And why Murtha is incessantly attacking it.


9 posted on 03/05/2007 12:20:21 PM PST by txhurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson