Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: freedomfiter2
With all due respect, advancing a candidate that is opposed to the views of many coalition members is what ends the coalition.

The coalition is built on the common ground of 'smaller govt, strong on defense, etc'.

Political conservatives will vote for pro-life candidates, as long as we believe they'll be political conservatives. We've proven that. But now, the socials are saying they *won't* vote for pro-choice candidates, no matter what.

If the Socials have now decided that their social views are more important that that core commonality, then they are the ones ending the coalition.

405 posted on 03/08/2007 7:41:23 AM PST by Dominic Harr (Conservative: The "ant", to a liberal's "grasshopper".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 340 | View Replies ]


To: Dominic Harr

The coalition is built on the common ground of 'smaller govt, strong on defense, etc'.

Yes and nearly all Soc-cons desire that as well. With Rudy it's one sided. The soc-cons get none of their important issues addressed. To make a coalition work, both sides need to give. Giuliani isn't a coalition candidate. Since there are others who could make everyone happy, supporting Rudy can only be taken as an act against the coalition.


411 posted on 03/08/2007 7:49:02 AM PST by freedomfiter2 (Duncan Hunter: pro-life, pro-2nd Amendment, pro-border control, pro-family)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 405 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson