Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Coming Entitlement Meltdown[Ron Paul]
http://www.house.gov/paul/ ^ | 05 March 2007 | Ron Paul

Posted on 03/08/2007 7:28:59 PM PST by FLOutdoorsman

David Walker, Comptroller General at the Government Accountability Office, appeared on the show “60 Minutes” last evening to discuss the federal budget outlook. If you saw the show, you know that he painted a very sobering picture regarding the federal government’s ability to meet its future obligations.

If you didn’t see the show, Mr. Walker’s theme was simple: government entitlement spending is like a runaway freight train headed straight at American taxpayers. He singled out the Medicare prescription drug bill, passed by Congress at the end of 2003, as “probably the most fiscally irresponsible piece of legislation since the 1960s.”

When it comes to Social Security and Medicare, the federal government simply won’t be able to keep its promises in the future. That is the reality every American should get used to, despite the grand promises of Washington reformers. Our entitlement system can’t be reformed- it’s too late. And the Medicare prescription drug bill is the final nail in the coffin.

The financial impact of the drug bill cannot be overstated. Government projections that the program would cost $400 billion over the next decade were a joke, as everyone in Congress knew even as they voted for the bill. The real cost will be at least $1 trillion in the first decade alone, and much more in following decades as the American population grows older.

The Medicare “trust fund” is already badly in the red, and the only solution will be a dramatic increase in payroll taxes for younger workers. The National Taxpayers Union reports that Medicare will consume nearly 40% of the nation’s GDP after several decades because of the new drug benefit. That’s not 40% of federal revenues, or 40% of federal spending, but rather 40 % of the nation’s entire private sector output!

The politicians who get reelected by passing such incredibly shortsighted legislation will never have to answer to future generations saddled with huge federal deficits. Those generations are the real victims, as they cannot object to the debts being incurred today in their names.

The official national debt figure, now approaching $9 trillion, reflects only what the federal government owes in current debts on money already borrowed. It does not reflect what the federal government has promised to pay millions of Americans in entitlement benefits down the road. Those future obligations put our real debt figure at roughly fifty trillion dollars- a staggering sum that is about as large as the total household net worth of the entire United States. Your share of this fifty trillion amounts to about $175,000.

Don’t believe for a second that we can grow our way out of the problem through a prosperous economy that yields higher future tax revenues. If present trends continue, by 2040 the entire federal budget will be consumed by Social Security and Medicare alone. The only options for balancing the budget would be cutting total federal spending by about 60%, or doubling federal taxes. To close the long-term entitlement gap, the U.S. economy would have to grow by double digits every year for the next 75 years.

The answer to these critical financial realities is simple, but not easy: We must rethink the very role of government in our society. Anything less, any tinkering or “reform,” won’t cut it. A good start would be for Congress to repeal the Medicare prescription drug bill.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government
KEYWORDS: entitlement; gao; genx; medicare; socialsecurity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 last
To: blam; mc6809e
"I really don't care if the government's credit is ruined. It deserves to be ruined."

Start buying gold now if you think that will happen.

The government's credit can never be ruined as long as there are hard working americans to tax and plunder and it has printing presses. They run low on cash and they just either print more or loot more.

81 posted on 03/09/2007 12:52:46 PM PST by from occupied ga (Your most dangerous enemy is your own government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: The_Eaglet
The Medicare Prescription Drug Plan will put another nail in the coffin of retirement benefits as well. Companies who gave this benefit as part of the employee retirement package will be encouraged to dump the cost on the government. Most states Medicaid programs have also turned over the prescription cost for the disabled once covered by Medicaid to Medicare.
82 posted on 03/09/2007 1:51:28 PM PST by cva66snipe (Kool Aid! The popular American favorite drink now Made In Mexico. Pro-Open Borders? Drink Up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight
If that happens, anything you own will also be worthless - might as well start living like cavemen.

You're confusing money and value.

83 posted on 03/09/2007 2:31:09 PM PST by mc6809e
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: mc6809e

I mean stocks, cash, those kind of assets...and probably real estate too...and your job? Bye bye.


84 posted on 03/09/2007 2:32:19 PM PST by RockinRight (My wish for Islam - The Glass Parking Lot Formerly Known As The Middle East.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight
I mean stocks, cash, those kind of assets...and probably real estate too...and your job? Bye bye.

Depends. I can see cash become worth less as the government tries to print itself out of debt, but that usually comes before bankruptcy. It might even be better for cash if the government simply goes ahead an defaults before they start running the presses overtime!

Private borrowing might become easier as money moves from public to private debt.

And as to stocks, well, if those companies are making what people want, a default on the national debt won't make much of a difference.

The trouble really comes from the actions of the government. If they just through up their hands there'd be little problem. But they have voters to payoff. And they'll be very angry when they find out they can't get their dole. I can see how the coming social unrest would hurt all those assets. Still, in the long term, the mounting debt does even MORE damage to things like stocks since they become targets of ever increasing taxes to support the debt. Bankruptcy would in effect look like a tax deduction.

But all that aside, it is fundamentally unfair for one generation to inherit the debt of another. We don't make children pay their parents debts when they die. Why should those children pay off a national debt they didn't create? Anyone that would lose money on government debt deserves the loss for knowingly trying to profit from a kind of slavery of later generations.

85 posted on 03/09/2007 2:47:07 PM PST by mc6809e
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Nuc1
Well, we'll probably be nuked before I can retire anyway.

Roger that.....Hey, we won't have to pay the mortgage though....course there won't be a house....., but hey, I have "nukealert", I'll know what's hot at least....agh, how do I turn off the italics..............

86 posted on 03/09/2007 3:01:00 PM PST by kickme (...at the window watching...and still not believing ANY of it...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mc6809e
But all that aside, it is fundamentally unfair for one generation to inherit the debt of another.

This is why the liberal deficit spenders in Congress and the White House need to be replaced ASAP.

87 posted on 03/09/2007 5:55:57 PM PST by The_Eaglet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: wordsofearnest
LOL Yeah but with my luck by then wood will be a hundred a board foot.

You know that things are going south when Lou Dobbs discovers that real inflation exceeds the CPI. I am beginning to believe the elite never shop. Of course I guess we can all eat cake. :D)
88 posted on 03/09/2007 5:59:05 PM PST by Nuc1 (NUC1 Sub pusher SSN 668 (Liberals Aren't Patriots))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: kickme
LOL

agh, how do I turn off the italics..............

I don't know how to turn them on!!
89 posted on 03/09/2007 6:02:45 PM PST by Nuc1 (NUC1 Sub pusher SSN 668 (Liberals Aren't Patriots))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson