The right should be standing by Coulter. We don't have that many heros that we can afford to help the left destroy the credibility of the few who dare to speak their minds.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
To: nancyvideo
I don't really have any feelings about Coulter her self but it is an important free speech issue.
2 posted on
03/09/2007 11:14:09 AM PST by
cripplecreek
(Peace without victory is a temporary illusion.)
To: nancyvideo
The problem I have is not the point she was trying to make but the venue she did it in. She is smart enough to know that she would get all the press, which, in my opinion, distracted the press from all of the positive events during the conference. She made herself the center of attention instead of the issues being discussed.
On the other hand, would the press have given the conference more than a sound bite if she didn't say this?
3 posted on
03/09/2007 11:16:23 AM PST by
mnehring
(Anyone who is with you 80% percent of the time is your 80% friend, not. your 20% your enemy- Reagan)
To: nancyvideo
--I have no problem with standing up for her-nor for my practise of referring to the political party of criminals, cheats, thieves and traitors as the "Demotraitors"---
5 posted on
03/09/2007 11:18:02 AM PST by
rellimpank
(-don't believe anything the MSM states about firearms or explosives--NRA Benefactor)
To: nancyvideo
"The right should be standing by Coulter." From a personal perspective, what she said was just good ol'fashioned tacky. I don't support any kind of potty mouth especially when it lowers the discussion into the gutter. I support her other stances but I don't support tacky potty mouths.
6 posted on
03/09/2007 11:21:18 AM PST by
avacado
To: nancyvideo
We cannot afford to keep shooting at each other, much less at our wounded...
7 posted on
03/09/2007 11:21:35 AM PST by
LiteKeeper
(Beware the secularization of America; the Islamization of Eurabia)
To: nancyvideo
Stand by her for what?
Seriously, she said something stupid for the shock value, just like she always does.. She's the Howard Stern of these book writing pundents for the right.
She's free to speak her mind, but I am under no obligation to defend her for her own boorish behavior. Will she get a fair shake in the press? Of course not, but she knows that, she's a big girl.
To: nancyvideo
I generally agree with the article. But personally, I draw the line with the use of vulgarity, which has nothing to do with PC Speech and everything to do with the idea of civility.
That said, I think the critical reaction from all corners developed into something ridiculous. One would have thought Ann used the far more vulgar four letter F-word.
10 posted on
03/09/2007 11:24:32 AM PST by
TAdams8591
(Guiliani is a Democrat in Republican drag.)
To: nancyvideo
Obligatory Ann Coulter post
11 posted on
03/09/2007 11:25:09 AM PST by
TommyDale
(What will Rudy do in the War on Terror? Implement gun control on insurgents and Al Qaeda?)
To: nancyvideo
I have heard no one criticize her right to free speech.
But there is a time and place for everything. Her faggot joke was at the wrong time, in the wrong place.
IMHO
To: nancyvideo
Amen! That was excellent.
16 posted on
03/09/2007 11:29:18 AM PST by
The Ghost of FReepers Past
(Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
To: nancyvideo
I stand by Ann Coulter. Sometimes I disagree with her, but I still stand by her. She is so bright and forceful, and we need people such as she is. And if he is not one of those bundles of twigs, who is?
17 posted on
03/09/2007 11:29:22 AM PST by
twonie
(RUDY FOR PRESIDENT '08. THERE - A COMMITMENT OUT LOUD.)
To: nancyvideo
The right IS standing by Ann. It's only people like Bill O'Reilly, McCain, Rudy and their bots on here that aren't. Oh, they'll "defend her right to say it", but they'll complain about her "venue for saying it" and how it is "tacky" and "potty mouth". Fact is that it is a Rohrshach test to see where you fit in the political spectrum. Defend Ann, and you're on the right, condemn her, and you're not. Simple as that.
To: nancyvideo
Why should anyone defend Coulter? She is all about herself. She can defend herself.
To: nancyvideo
The stupid bulimic keeps blowing her own foot off. Why the heck should I support that?
24 posted on
03/09/2007 11:31:51 AM PST by
Artemis Webb
(Be a REAL conservative. Stay home and pout so Hillary can win!)
To: nancyvideo
I support her without condition.. no matter what she says no matter how she says it. Without hearing what she says and without knowing the context in which it was said, I would support her at any time in anything! I have that much respect for her intellect, discernment and personal integrity. I have never and expect NEVER to hear her compromise herself or beliefs or to deliberately misrepresent ANYTHING, EVER, for any reason! Her honesty and absolute professional integrity along with her consummate ability to nail them on every turn is what is most galling to Liberals and the very thing they would most like to challenge if they could.
27 posted on
03/09/2007 11:35:23 AM PST by
SMARTY
("Stay together, pay the soldiers and forget everything else." Lucius Septimus Severus)
To: nancyvideo
I don't care much for attention whores...conservative or otherwise.
30 posted on
03/09/2007 11:36:30 AM PST by
A.Hun
(Common sense is no longer common.)
To: nancyvideo
The right should be standing by Coulter. I know I am. Just goes to show we, as conservatives, aren't quite as smart as we think we are, collectively. So many miss her allusion to the FACT that certain words, thanks to Political Correctness, are off limits and that if one uses them, they must enter rehab.
Nevermind that we let the left define what is acceptable and what isn't.
32 posted on
03/09/2007 11:36:42 AM PST by
subterfuge
(Today, Tolerance =greatest virtue;Hypocrisy=worst character defect; Discrimination =worst atrocity)
To: nancyvideo
Ann did the right thing in view of how ballistic the media and lefties went regarding her comment - a joke, a flip comment. They are afraid she might send a trend and people will start to disregard the censorship imposed by the PC crowd.
We are faced with invasion across our borders, innocent people being jailed, war, terrorism, etc. - and people go into a frenzy over a word! This is absurd. While Ann has been called far worse, that apparently is okay. The left/liberals are hypocrites and so full of rage that they appear to lose touch with reality.
36 posted on
03/09/2007 11:37:40 AM PST by
Dante3
To: nancyvideo
I fully agree. Republicans continually set themselves up for attacks from the left by abandoning their own. Ann's joke was a bit sophmoric for the C-PAC audience, but they could have pointed that out and laughed it off. But no, they have to get all up tight, embarrassed and offended.
37 posted on
03/09/2007 11:39:07 AM PST by
Eva
To: nancyvideo
Conservatives, on the other hand, are more likely to rely on the substance and facts of a debate ... Inferring Edwards is a faggot while making a joke when in fact there is no proof nor allegations he is a gay was the only issue I had. Nonetheless, I'm pleased with her speech, and cannot care less about the sensitive souls in the MSM.
39 posted on
03/09/2007 11:39:31 AM PST by
theDentist
(Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson