Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Has Ann Coulter Hit Her Tipping Point?
AP ^

Posted on 03/11/2007 9:08:10 AM PDT by doesnt suffer fools gladly

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-311 next last
To: doesnt suffer fools gladly

Anyone seen Rush with Ann as President and VP on the 1/2 News Hour on Fox. Great stuff. RATS getting what they have been slinging for years and what is great it hit more of the truth than fiction. Great comedy.


41 posted on 03/11/2007 9:51:42 AM PDT by Logical me (Oh, well!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BibChr

>>FReepers defend Ann because she's said 1001 wonderful things correctly, acerbically, cuttingly. She shows the guts and gusto and take-no-prisoners attitude that we wish to God even one or two of our "leaders" would show."

Yes, a thousand times, yes!

>>But no one except God is perfect, and no human being except Jesus has NEVER misspoken, nor needed to reconsider or regroup. Statements like this lessen her effectiveness and derail the discussion.<<

Yes!

>>But you know, no one's always right. Better friends and supporters say, "Hon -- that was dumb. Really. It isn't worth you becoming 'The Faggot Lady' in people's minds. Then they won't hear all the vastly more important stuff you have to say. Don't be the last to admit it was dumb."<<

EXACTLY! Clinton will ALWAYS be known for "I did not have sex with that woman.."

ALgore will always be know for saying he invented the internet.

Is this what Ann wants to be remembered for, seriously? It is Churchillian? Is it Reaganesque?


42 posted on 03/11/2007 9:56:04 AM PDT by SerpentDove
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: dayglored
keep saying it like it is Ann....don't let the so called 'conservative' apologists get to you.
43 posted on 03/11/2007 9:56:49 AM PDT by Vaquero ("An armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: spanalot

This entire argument is so gay!


44 posted on 03/11/2007 9:57:38 AM PDT by opbuzz (Right way, wrong way, Marine way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: doesnt suffer fools gladly
It's a cycle, she said: she says something, the same people become hysterical, and that's the end of it.

Yup.

Same thing for Rush although his cycle only comes around once every few years.

45 posted on 03/11/2007 9:57:57 AM PDT by Condor 63
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buckalfa
Being vulgar or appearing mean spirited does not advance the conservative cause. Ann Coulter (sigh) is intelligent enough to get her point across without resorting to school yard taunts.

Might agree with you except we are not dealing with intelligent RAT voters. Someone, once in a while with truth, has to deliver something they understand and does it rattle them? Ever check Rosie lately? That is just one of many that dump on us. If you can't stand it, just ignore it. It has really caused lots of thinking and a few of us red blooded rough and tumble can enjoy it once in a while.

46 posted on 03/11/2007 9:58:19 AM PDT by Logical me (Oh, well!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: doesnt suffer fools gladly

On Friday March 2, after being introduced by Presidential Candidate Mitt Romney, Ann Coulter walked to the microphone and uttered the phrase that would shake the political world.

"I was going to have a few comments on the other Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards, but it turns out you have to go into rehab if you use the word ‘faggot,’ so I — so kind of an impasse, can’t really talk about Edwards."

The quote is an obvious joke and a comment on our times. It's even funnier considering how many outraged people now want to send Ann Coulter to rehab for daring to say it. Her comment also held political implications bringing up issues of the first amendment and freedom of speech as well as questioning the integrity of John Edwards himself.

Of course the usual gang of pot smoking, empty headed morons who wouldn't know a thought if it ran over them with a car were outraged. This is "hate speech." These are the same people who have no problem with university professors calling for the death of Americans simply because they are Americans. Good thing I'm here to bring sunshine onto their hypocritical stances once again. You see, there is another medium that has been using the word "faggot" for a long time now. Several years in fact.

Enter the show "South Park." Just a few years ago there was an episode called "Follow that Egg" (first aired Nov. 2nd, 2005) in which a jealous Mrs. Garrison had the following exchange with her gay ex lover Mr. Slave:

Mr. Slave: Mr. Garrison, there's something you should know. Al and I are getting married.
Mrs. Garrison: Married?
Big Gay Al: Yes.
Mrs. Garrison: You can't get married! You're faggots!

Later while trying to get a crowd worked in to a frenzy, Mrs. Garrison says the following:

Mrs. Garrison: Appeal to the governor? Oh, come on! Where's your balls? Fag drag!

From the episode "Mr. Garrison's fancy new vagina" (first aired March 9, 2005) come the following gems:

Mrs. Garrison: I'd rather be a woman who can't have periods than a fag.

From the show called "South Park is totally gay" (first aired Oct 22, 2003) come the following quotes:

Cartman: Yeah, don't be such a fag, dude!
and

Craig: You'll never be as metro-sexual as us! C'mon fags!

All these episodes came out years before Ann made her joke and the left was silent. No calls for boycotts. No demands for apologies. No crude comparisons to dictators and lunatics. Just utter silence. Why? There is no difference between what Ann did and what "South Park" does. Both make jokes of a political nature. You can't even argue that "South Park" only makes gay jokes at the expense of fictional characters. In the episode "Trapped in a Closet" (which first premiered Nov 16, 2005) several people including Tom Cruise and John Travolta literally become trapped in a closet and refuse to come out.

But if this isn't enough for the hypocrites on the left, I call their attention to "Rolling Stone Magazine" March 22, 2007 issue (http://www.rollingstone.com/news/coverstory/south_park_still_sick_still_wrong/page/1) that features an interview with "South Park" creators Matt Stone and Trey Parker. In it both Stone and Parker loudly tout their thoughts about lefties.

"...while soldiers and policemen protect me so I can say things like 'fudge-packing faggot' on my television show,..."

-Matt Stone

"...to go up to a tattooed, pierced vegan and say, 'Whatever, you tattooed faggot, you're a pierced faggot and whatever.' '' He looks very pleased with himself. "That's hardcore."

-Trey Parker

So admit it: you hate Ann Coulter and that's the only reason you're mad now. Just admit it, if nothing else to yourselves. If it's okay that "South Park" said it two years ago, then it should be okay to say it today. And if it's not okay to say it today, then where is your outrage over Parker and Stone?


47 posted on 03/11/2007 9:58:34 AM PDT by Tzimisce (How Would Mohammed Vote? Hillary for President! www.dndorks.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: par4
My band covers "American Idiot" by Green Day, but I have taken the liberty of changing a couple of lines. Instead of "maybe I'm the faggot American", I sing "baby I'm not a faggot American". I think I'll put extra emphasis on "faggot", in honor of Ann.

Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!

48 posted on 03/11/2007 10:01:01 AM PDT by wku man (Claire Wolfe's "awkward time" is quickly coming to an end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: doesnt suffer fools gladly

Give it up, Girlymen!!
Ann's a fighter, and we need her!


49 posted on 03/11/2007 10:02:13 AM PDT by Flintlock (Keep yer powder dry--yer gonna need it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero
> keep saying it like it is Ann....don't let the so called 'conservative' apologists get to you.

Frankly, I thought her comment was a hoot, and right on target, even if it did distract attention from the real issue at hand, which is that Edwards is a dangerous fruitcake. (Can I say that?)

I have a large tolerance for edgy comments like hers. It's called freedom of speech.

I was just having fun with one of my favorite photos of her.

50 posted on 03/11/2007 10:04:50 AM PDT by dayglored (Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Tzimisce
The quote is an obvious joke and a comment on our times. It's even funnier considering how many outraged people now want to send Ann Coulter to rehab for daring to say it.

In fact, the feigned outrage of people over this innocuous comment, pretty much makes her point.

Jag!


51 posted on 03/11/2007 10:05:16 AM PDT by JaguarXKE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Tzimisce

>>There is no difference between what Ann did and what "South Park" does.<<

Very true. Both employ juvenile humor that a sixth grader could think of.


52 posted on 03/11/2007 10:05:20 AM PDT by SerpentDove
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: doesnt suffer fools gladly
Coulter is obviously a brilliant person. She does not need to be a shock trooper to be effective. Her recent episode is less about her than the discredit it did to the CPAC. That is the real issue.

Has she reached the tipping point? Yes, with me she has.

53 posted on 03/11/2007 10:07:23 AM PDT by Lando Lincoln
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Logical me
I, for one, am glad to see someone finally connecting with a roundhouse on the liberals. I'm sick of this "we don't dare sink to their level" crap. The Rats and their Socialist ilk are waging political guerilla war against our side, while we're busy trying to engage in civilized debate. Gloves off, hit 'em with their own ammo, and we'll win. Keep pussy footin' around, and we're doomed to impotence.

Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!

54 posted on 03/11/2007 10:08:44 AM PDT by wku man (Claire Wolfe's "awkward time" is quickly coming to an end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: doesnt suffer fools gladly
columnist Michelle Malkin lamented that Coulter had tarred the work of people at the Washington conference

Memo to M. Malkin et al. who believe this--not one person in a hundred, a thousand even, know that CPAC exists, and half of them are liberals who don't like it anyway. It's a precious basis for objection and further proof that conservatives sometimes take themselves too seriously.

55 posted on 03/11/2007 10:11:04 AM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doesnt suffer fools gladly

I had to stop reading as soon as the writer called Ann attractive.


56 posted on 03/11/2007 10:13:55 AM PDT by Prodigal Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
"She does not need to be a shock trooper to be effective."

I'm not sure. I remember Michelle Malkin when she was a local Seattle columnist on one of the liberal papers. She was a breath of fresh air; brilliant, articulate and pleasant. When she first made her move to the national spotlight she didn't gain much attention. After a while she switched up her format and became more brittle and abrasive, and suddenly took up hot button topics such as illegal immigration whereas before it wasn't a topic that interested her.

It's a common formula. Remember Lou Dobbs before he became an immigration hero? He was a broadcasted cure for insomnia.

I far preferred the original Malkin...she was being herself, not selling herself as a product.

57 posted on 03/11/2007 10:14:01 AM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: SerpentDove
Is this what Ann wants to be remembered for, seriously? It is Churchillian? Is it Reaganesque?

Last I heard, Ann wasn't planning on saving the world, or even running for anything. Get over it. sheesh.

58 posted on 03/11/2007 10:18:35 AM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson

You make valid points. But Ann is now well established. She could tone it down and, with her considerable intellect and knowledge, be a powerful voice in conservatism. As it is, she has become a parody of herself.


59 posted on 03/11/2007 10:19:12 AM PDT by Lando Lincoln
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard

>>Last I heard, Ann wasn't planning on saving the world, or even running for anything. Get over it. sheesh.<<

No, just promoting herself at the expense of the conservative movement. Which maybe you don't care about either, I don't know.


60 posted on 03/11/2007 10:20:39 AM PDT by SerpentDove
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-311 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson