Posted on 3/13/2007, 5:23:45 AM by doug from upland
BACKGROUND: hillcap.org
Chelsea Clinton is on the witness list in the historic civil suit Paul v Clinton. We may find out whether perjury is genetic.
In her lying declaration presented to Judge Aurelio Munoz on April 7, 2006, Hillary claimed to have no knowledge of any arrangement for her husband to go to work for Stan Lee Media.
Peter Paul spent in excess of $1.6 million of his own money on Hillary's senate campaign. Why would he have done that? He was a big supporter of Ronald Reagan and friends with the Hollywood conservatives. He was no fan of Hillary. Obviously, he did it for the benefit of his company.
It will be interesting when we finally get to hear the testimony of Chelsea. At the Aug. 12 gala concert Chelsea discussed her daddy going to work with the man who created Spider Man. She was really excited.
The next day, this woman had a gathering at her house for large Clinton Lie-brary donors.
At the Streisand event, when Hillary saw Andrea Paul, she ran up to her, grabbed her by the hand, and took her to meet Babs. Hillary introduced Andrea as the wife of the man who paid for last night's event --- my new best friend.
Chelsea spent over a half hour at the event eating with Peter and Andrea. Underneath a tent outside, she joined Peter, Tendo Oto, Oto's interpreter Jonathon Rogers, strip club owner and Clinton's "eyes and ears" Jim Levin, and big time Clinton donor Haim Saban. Chelsea spoke of how she and her parents had stayed up late playing Scrabble and discussing daddy's new job with Stan Lee Media.
When discovery starts and Chelsea is called, will she tell the truth? We are going to see. What kind of evil mother sets up her own daughter for perjury? Hillary, that's the kind of mother who would do that. She is Joe Stalin in drag.
Your day is getting closer, Hillary. You are going to be stopped.
Hey Doug I wonder if Babs hear something called Bra OMGGG LMAO
Now me I be blabbing to the prosecutor to save my skin family loyality screw that LMAO
Mocking Babs with a YouTube sing-along --- http://youtube.com/watch?v=hmtmes-FijQ
babs..hideous, simply hideous..no mirrors in that huge house of hers?
Chelsea will say "I don't recall", and get away with it.
I've seen this movie before.
If it were my mom and I was asked to testify, I'd lie my ass off.
http://72.14.253.104/search?q=cache:m9v89Y_fapQJ:www.usjf.net/print.php%3Fsid%3D314+chelsea+clinton+scrabble&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=8&gl=us
b) The entire Clinton family acknowledges and endorses WJC’s agreement with Paul.
The extent to which the Clinton family focused their attention on Paul throughout the evening was also indicative of the special relationship Paul thought he had with WJC. At the VIP dinner, Paul was seated next to WJC, without interruption, for three hours. (4CT797:14-15,20-22) Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton, and Chelsea Clinton all spoke with Paul at length – during the private welcome when they arrived, during the concert, at the small reception for the Clintons afterwards, and at the VIP dinner that followed. (4CT797:11-19; 901) Throughout the evening, the enthusiasm with which all three Clintons discussed WJC’s future with Paul seemed to show their collective interest in and support for the project. (1CT29:27-30:10; 4CT797:15-18)
c) The Clintons appear to further acknowledge and support WJC’s business relationship with Paul and Oto at the Streisand brunch.
The special treatment of Paul – and of his Japanese partner – seemed equally strong the following day during a brunch at Barbra Streisand’s Malibu estate, an exclusive event open only to persons who had already donated at least $500,000 to the Clinton Presidential Library. (4CT797:23-27) Although they didn’t meet this criterion, the Pauls, Oto, and Oto’s translator were admitted, thanks to arrangements made through WJC and Terrence McAuliffe. (4CT797:28-798:2)
Chelsea Clinton sought out Paul and, in front of Oto, spent about 25 minutes recapping the events of the night before. (4CT798:3-6) She described how, after she and her parents left the Tribute at 2:30 a.m., they had stayed up playing Scrabble, discussing the Tribute and the prospect of her father working with the creator of Spider Man when he left the White House. (1CT31:7-11; 4CT798:6-9)
She was just trying to remind herself that she needed to renew her SAG membership.
lol!
"I don't know, I don't recall, I don't remember". I bet she learned from her mommy, not to mention the Scooter Libbey lynching.
========================================
So if your mom were cheating someone and lying in an effort to gain political power and become the chief law enforcement officer of the nation, you would get on the stand and lie. I guess that behavior from an atheist shouldn't surprise any of us. You are part of the problem, but at least you admit you are a liar.
Is there a date set for the perjurer-in-waiting?
I loved my mother very much, but I would have never helped her commit fraud.
The brief has been submitted to the Appellate Court in an effort to bring Hillary back in as a defendant. After their decision, we will be ready for discover to begin. Let the games begin.
I admire your tenacity, but I do not share your faith in the judicial system when it comes to Democrats.
My mom would not have expected me to lie for her. She taught me better than that.
Will a Clinton lie under oath?? A better question would be: Has a clinton ever told the truth under oath?
I understand. But discovery is going to be very, very interesting. Peter's home videos shown in the courtroom should be very interesting.
Hillary's first lie in her declaration was easy to blow out of the water. http://youtube.com/watch?v=ZY2b3Db3dGE
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.