Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: restornu

I would like to add that I have an M.A. in mathematics from Arizona State University. In the course of my career I have constructed queueing models using some fairly primitive tools where I had to verify the random number generators and provide my own data distributions.

I can attest that computer models are quite subject to "fiddling" where care must be taken to assure that the results are not biased by the operator. I spent lots of time running my home-made tools against queuing systems where the results could be computed using closed equations in order to validate my techniques.

When the "scientist" makes no attempt to hide his bias the results are probably useless.


38 posted on 03/13/2007 11:49:39 PM PDT by the_Watchman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: the_Watchman

"When the "scientist" makes no attempt to hide his bias the results are probably useless."

Also, when these Global Warmist pseudo scientists try to ban any discussion about the obvious bs of Global Warming Alarmists, that as noted in the link is a sure sign of bad science. The no debate Global Warming Facists know they will lose the big debates with people like those scientists on the BBC link.


41 posted on 03/14/2007 8:27:08 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (GW has more Honor and Integrity in his little finger than ALL of the losers on the "hate Bush" band)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson