Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

[Idaho gun shop] Red's loses its gun license
magicvalley.com/Times-News (Idaho) ^ | 3/14/07 | Cassidy Friedman

Posted on 03/16/2007 9:50:21 AM PDT by kiriath_jearim

TWIN FALLS - Red's Trading Post, one of Idaho's oldest gun shops, can trade no longer.

The U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives has revoked the business's license to buy, trade or obtain guns after an ATF audit found Red's employees sold guns improperly numerous times between 1999 and 2004.

Red's manager, Ryan Horsley, admits when the business sold guns it sometimes left blank required parts of a gun purchase form, omitted a background check on a special order, failed to log multiple handgun sales to the same customer in five working days, did not keep track of guns returned to manufacturers, threw away denied applications dealers are required to keep for 20 years and failed to post a gun safety sign and pamphlets.

The ATF revoked Red's license March 5, shutting down 90 percent of the income that has sustained the store through three generations of Horsleys.

"They are taking very minor things and blowing them out of proportion," said Terry Horsley, the shop's owner and Ryan's mother.

The shop, at 215 Shoshone St. South, can sell the 1,000 guns remaining in its inventory, and can continue selling gun accessories and ammunition.

But accessories account for only 10 percent of its revenue.

"I'm just sitting here going, 'What am I going to do?,'" Ryan Horsley said.

The five-year audit found violations over a period in which 10,000 guns were sold, Horsley said.

"Mistakes happen. Stuff happens," Horsley said. "I think it's unreal expecting to have 100 percent non errors."

The bad news, which comes on the heels of record profits, could now close the store, Terry Horsley said.

Red's has paid $20,000 in legal fees protesting the ATF's decision. On Feb. 23, Red's legal team filed a petition in federal court in Boise.

The judicial review will consider, among other things, whether Red's "willfully" violated the law.

"'Not willful' is one of their petitions," said Deborah Ferguson, assistant U.S. attorney, representing the ATF's industry operations. "'Willful has been defined by case law. I would expect the court to look at that legal authority."

Case law defines "willful," an essential component of the allegations, as "they knew of the regulations and did not abide by them," Ferguson said.

Ryan Horsley said Red's was found responsible of several violations in an earlier audit.

But he said the infractions are petty and do not justify a revoked license.

"There's no missing guns," he said. "There are errors but everyone has errors."

Walt Sinclair, a Boise co-counsel for Red's, said the errors were clerical, not intentional.

He said it's not the first time the ATF has revoked the license of a Twin Falls gun dealership.

"Blue Lakes Sporting Goods lost its license," Sinclair said. "They had been there forever. It was a family business. It was a real success story, but this type of petty, technical noncompliance caused them to end up going out of business."

The ATF has 60 days from Feb. 23 to respond Red's petition.

The ATF Seattle Field Office spokeswoman declined to comment on Red's case until after judicial review.

"If the individuals reapply, the facts from the revocation would be considered for any future licenses," said spokeswoman Julianne Marshall. "Industry Operations will consider their application. However, they have an interest for public safety. This license was revoked for a reason."

A judge may still overturn ATF's decision.



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; US: Idaho
KEYWORDS: banglist; jackboots
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-158 next last
To: mylife

The 90% figure is as contrived and cooked as the nonsense from The Brady Bunch. One in ten actual gun dealers did not go out of business over the past fifteen years.


41 posted on 03/16/2007 10:41:31 AM PDT by NorthFlaRebel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: NorthFlaRebel; mylife

oops, that should have read "Nine out of ten actual gun dealers did not go out of business over the past fifteen years".


42 posted on 03/16/2007 10:43:29 AM PDT by NorthFlaRebel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: NorthFlaRebel

need? what does need have to do with it? and what do you mean by real?
some of those people were people who wanted to be able to purchase firearms and have them shipped directly to their homes, not pay an extra $10-$50 to have it delivered to a dealer.
many of them ran their firearms business as a home based business. alot of them got jacked in various ways for it, so they dropped their license. others decided that the intrusion, and all the hoops they had to jump thru weren't worth it.
btw. do you NEED a drivers license? why don't you take a cab or a bus or walk or ride a bike? are you a real driver? do you drive a truck or a bus?


43 posted on 03/16/2007 10:45:00 AM PDT by absolootezer0 (stop repeat offenders - don't re-elect them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
"if they make the paperwork so onerous and demand zero-defects (a practical impossibility), they can make it so there is no place to buy guns."

The paperwork isn't that onerous and zero defects is easy to accomplish. Failure to send in multiple purchase forms, fill out the whole form, and falure to have paperwork on stuff sent back to the distributor, or manufacturer over a lengthy period like 5 years, when it's been pointed out at least once things are bad, indicates poor organizational skills, if not an uncaring, or lazy attitude in the matter.

" What part of the word "infringed" in the Second Amendment do you find to be unclear?"

The Constitution gives congress the power to regulate business. These are business forms, and this is a store. The guy needed significant improvement in his organizational and accounting skills.

44 posted on 03/16/2007 10:53:16 AM PDT by spunkets ("Freedom is about authority", Rudy Giuliani, gun grabber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: absolootezer0
Like I said, they were not actual dealers selling to people. The claim the poster is trying to make is that 90% of dealers have been put "out of business" by the BATF, when most of these people were never running a business to begin with. And he's tring to tie it to rises in gun prices. That's silly, because you or I could not have purchased from one of these people, who were not running an actual business, to begin with. Its just a faulty claim.

Have some small, real "mom & pop" dealers been run out of business due to BATF regulations? No doubt. But its ridiculous to claim that 90% of dealers who opperated 15 years ago are now out of business. Its just not true, just like 5,000 "children" a year are not "killed by guns"(or whatever the number of the day is over at Brady HQ).
45 posted on 03/16/2007 10:55:01 AM PDT by NorthFlaRebel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Sorry but this clraely isn`t a Second Amendment issue.
46 posted on 03/16/2007 10:55:41 AM PDT by neverhillorat (HILLORAT WINS, WE ALL LOSE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Sorry but this isn`t a Second Amendment issue.
47 posted on 03/16/2007 10:56:06 AM PDT by neverhillorat (HILLORAT WINS, WE ALL LOSE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: NorthFlaRebel
"You have any proof for your claim that there has been a 90% reduction in gun dealers in the past 15 years?"

They changed the dealer license rules. They now require a fixed place of business, a store that conforms to local zoning rules. All those who had formerly sold from home, or other place of business as a secondary op, where not renewed.

48 posted on 03/16/2007 10:56:45 AM PDT by spunkets ("Freedom is about authority", Rudy Giuliani, gun grabber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner
When you have a business and sell over 10,000 guns over a five year period as the article suggests, you will make a mistake here or there. If you look hard enough, you shall find errors everywhere.

Essentially it's all "administrative" that they nailed him with. It sounds impressive, but it's administrative dot the "i", and cross his "t" type stuff.
49 posted on 03/16/2007 10:58:37 AM PDT by Red6 (Come and get it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum


The current AG's policy...


50 posted on 03/16/2007 10:59:03 AM PDT by rahbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim
The ATF is an illegal federal agency and should be disbanded for being unconstitutional.
51 posted on 03/16/2007 11:00:17 AM PDT by miliantnutcase ("If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. If it stops moving, subsidize it." -ichabod1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spunkets
The Constitution gives congress the power to regulate business.

It does?

Please point to that provision of the Constitution that empowers the Federal Government to require a license to sell firearms.

52 posted on 03/16/2007 11:03:02 AM PDT by Logophile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Zathras
" Read "Unintended Consequences" and read the history of ATF enforcement and their goal to destroy gun dealers. It opened my eyes!"

Yes, they've been bad. Can't say they didn't give this guy at least one chance to clean up his act. Most dealers I know are consciencious aboout this stuff. for some reason, this guy couldn't clean up his act.

53 posted on 03/16/2007 11:03:17 AM PDT by spunkets ("Freedom is about authority", Rudy Giuliani, gun grabber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Dave thA

I see maybe six errors out of 10,000 sales, most of them paperwork errors.



With no resulting actual harm, other than miffed bureaucrats.


54 posted on 03/16/2007 11:08:31 AM PDT by Atlas Sneezed (Your FRiendly FReeper Patent Attorney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mylife
Sounds like Ryan Effed up

STFU idiot.

It actually sounds like jack-booted thugs, from an overbearing, overzealous group of nothing more than armed tax collectors, are trying to ruin yet another hard-working American family running a small business selling perfectly legal products, and over what?

TECHNICALITIES?

The same "technicalities" that have resulted in BATFAG agents raiding homes and killing innocent (of any wrong-doing other than not paying a government-mandated tax, failing to jump through hoops in a confusing maze of nonsensical gun laws, or making TECHNICAL mistakes on a ridiculous number of required forms) American citizens.

Many remember Ruby Ridge, WACO, but have heard little or nothing about the countless other ill-conceived raids that ended up needlessly getting people killed.

If anyone has "effed up" in this, and MANY other cases, it is the BATF, and the liberal gun-grabbing politicians that have come up with the multitude of nonsensical, un-Constitutional gun laws now on the books in America.

55 posted on 03/16/2007 11:09:50 AM PDT by DocH (Gun-grabbers, you can HAVE my guns... lead first.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NorthFlaRebel

so then, by your reasoning, the guy that lives down the street from me that sells vacuums isn't a dealer because he doesn't sell them thru a store?
or that amway/ alticor/ mary kay/ avon sellers aren't dealers because they run the business part time out of their home?
they do the same thing with other products that many of these once licensed gun dealers did with different products. maybe it wasn't full time, maybe it wasn't grand scale, but they sold and dealt in guns.


56 posted on 03/16/2007 11:10:19 AM PDT by absolootezer0 (stop repeat offenders - don't re-elect them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Logophile
" Please point to that provision of the Constitution that empowers the Federal Government to require a license to sell firearms."

One of the motivations for holding the Constitutional convention, was that the Articles of Confederation did not provide for the regulation of interstate commerce. See Article 8 of the US Constitution, "The Congress shall have the power to... regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states, and with the Indian tribes;"

57 posted on 03/16/2007 11:11:54 AM PDT by spunkets ("Freedom is about authority", Rudy Giuliani, gun grabber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: DocH

Nice mouth! you kiss your mamma with that filthy thing?

I didnt read past your insult


58 posted on 03/16/2007 11:13:16 AM PDT by mylife (The Roar of the Masses Could be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: tcostell
I agree, but if the guy wanted to be in the business he needs to follow the rules.

I agree. Just make the rules follow the Constitution and stop changing said rules arbitrarily every other year.

This smells like a rail-road job by the BATFE from a mile off...

59 posted on 03/16/2007 11:17:26 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (What would a free man do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ccmay
Really, it's not that hard to comply, unless you are hiring idiot employees.

How in the HELL is the average small business (gun store) owner going to be able to afford to get the best employees, if all he can afford to pay is seven or eight dollars an hour?

I'm sure most of them are conscientious enough to try an hire the best people they can, but they are limited.

They should NOT be held accountable, especially to the point of LOSING their business, for mere TECHNICAL infractions, of highly convoluted government-mandated red-tape, committed by their employees.

The BATF's tactics are unconstitutional and UN-AMERICAN.

60 posted on 03/16/2007 11:17:34 AM PDT by DocH (Gun-grabbers, you can HAVE my guns... lead first.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-158 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson