Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/17/2007 7:23:39 AM PDT by The_Eaglet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
To: OrthodoxPresbyterian

ping


2 posted on 03/17/2007 7:25:36 AM PDT by The_Eaglet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The_Eaglet

After stabbiing our troops in the back, "he is dead to me".


3 posted on 03/17/2007 7:25:45 AM PDT by slapshot (""USAF- when you absolutely, positively need it delivered on target, on time, right away)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The_Eaglet

March 12, 2008?


4 posted on 03/17/2007 7:26:26 AM PDT by LdSentinal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The_Eaglet

I would vote for Ron Paul, but he is invested in defeat in Iraq, so I can't.


5 posted on 03/17/2007 7:26:43 AM PDT by RatsDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The_Eaglet

I could wish him luck, but that would be a waste of a wish--if I wanted to wish him luck.


6 posted on 03/17/2007 7:27:06 AM PDT by Clara Lou (Run, Fred, run!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The_Eaglet

We need a warrior when we are at war and not an accountant. Ron Paul is more like an accountant than a warrrior, and he is a coward that turned his back on our troops. If Ron Paul had his way, Saddam would still be in power because he voted against the Iraq war resolution.


7 posted on 03/17/2007 7:30:28 AM PDT by jrooney ( Hold your cards close.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The_Eaglet

Wouldn't he AND Duncan Hunter have to relinquish their House seats to run...???


8 posted on 03/17/2007 7:30:42 AM PDT by JB in Whitefish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The_Eaglet

http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/members/p000583/votes/


9 posted on 03/17/2007 7:31:44 AM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The_Eaglet
If a tree falls in the forest and no one gives a flip... Did Ron Paul really announce?


10 posted on 03/17/2007 7:32:26 AM PDT by nctexan (Top 10 Presidential Reqs. for 2008 - see my homepage)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The_Eaglet

Guess he and Duncan Hunter and Tancredo can now split that one percent.


12 posted on 03/17/2007 7:34:13 AM PDT by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The_Eaglet

Soon he'll crack the all important threshold of greater than .01 per cent name recognition.................


13 posted on 03/17/2007 7:34:15 AM PDT by Lakeshark (Thank a member of the US armed forces for their sacrifice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The_Eaglet

RP is wasting his time and ours with this foolish announcement.


17 posted on 03/17/2007 7:44:42 AM PDT by dc-zoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The_Eaglet
Ron Who?

I think Ron Burgundy has higher name recognition:


24 posted on 03/17/2007 7:57:39 AM PDT by TonyInOhio (Ave crux spes unica)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The_Eaglet
Ron Paul (news, bio, voting record), a nine-term congressman from Texas and a former Libertarian Party candidate for the White House, said on Monday he would seek the 2008 Republican presidential nomination.

And will strive for up to a 1% vote taking via voting machine confusion in November.

27 posted on 03/17/2007 8:08:06 AM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The_Eaglet

I thought Ron Paul was a Libertarian? What's up with calling him a Republican? Libertarians are pretty foul people, IMO.


29 posted on 03/17/2007 8:40:09 AM PDT by MovementConservative (Run Fred run.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The_Eaglet; All

Well Ron can sure count on the disgruntled and disappointed Baathist vote, since he voted against the liberation of Iraq, and if he had his way, Saddam would still be the smiling, sadistic face of Iraq today and probably closer to an operable nuke to counter his soon-to-be nuke neighbors in Iran.

And Iraqi dissidents would still be getting fed into shredding machines, and Iraqi women would still be taken to Saddam's rape rooms for some cuddle time with Uday and Qusay.

Ron Paul must think that was quite ok, and his vote to stab our troops over there in the back demonstrates where his priorities are.

If he had any integrity, he would either cease calling himself a Republican, and join up with the 'Rats, who apparently love him.

Ron and Kookcinich should run on the same ticket.


31 posted on 03/17/2007 8:55:02 AM PDT by mkjessup (If Reagan were still with us, he'd ask us to "win one more for the Gipper, vote for Duncan Hunter!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Youngstown

Ping! : )


34 posted on 03/17/2007 9:00:31 AM PDT by TAdams8591 (Guiliani is a Democrat in Republican drag.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The_Eaglet
Republican Paul enters 2008 White House race

And now for something completely ironic.

As Paul (who wants us to withdraw from Iraq) annouces, our troops fight Al Qaeda in Iraq.

Paul doesn't defend this country.

37 posted on 03/17/2007 9:08:54 AM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The_Eaglet

I'm voting for Ron.


47 posted on 03/17/2007 10:07:08 AM PDT by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The_Eaglet; All
Here's another Ron Paul quote to chew on:

"The best approach to Iran, and Syria for that matter, is to heed the advice of the Iraq Study Group Report, which states:

'… the United States should engage directly with Iran and Syria in order to try to obtain their commitment to constructive policies toward Iraq and other regional issues. In engaging with Syria and Iran, the United States should consider incentives, as well as disincentives, in seeking constructive results.'

- Ron Paul, January 15, 2007.

Your guy endorses the Iraq Surrender Group's lil 'study', and the only ingredients missing are the obligatory white flags.

America isn't about to elect Ron Paul anymore than they would elect that coward and traitor Jack Murtha.
48 posted on 03/17/2007 10:14:42 AM PDT by mkjessup (If Reagan were still with us, he'd ask us to "win one more for the Gipper, vote for Duncan Hunter!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson