Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russia May Put Missile Shield Stations in Diplomatic Missions Abroad
http://www.defencetalk.com/news/publish/missiles/Russia_May_Put_Missile_Shield_Stations_in_Diplomatic_Missions_Abroad160011024.php ^

Posted on 03/20/2007 2:04:05 PM PDT by kronos77

Russian Space Forces and Foreign Ministry are currently discussing the questions of placing anti-missile radar stations in Russian diplomatic missions in foreign countries, the Space Forces commander has said.

Colonel-General Vladimir Popovkin said in an interview with the Russian magazine Novosti Kosmonavtiki (Space Industry News) that the move will give Russia the opportunity to register the first stages of missile launches “that we cannot see from Russia’s territory” and adjust the flight tasks for the anti-missile weapons if an extraordinary situation occurs.

The general went on to say that the new generation quant optical stations require virtually no maintenance and can be fitted in “half of a room”. A station which will remotely control these stations all over the world will be built in Krasnokamensk in Russia and every six months specialists will run a routine check of the stations.

Popovkin also said that Russia is planning to build two new radar stations in the South — near the city of Armavir. He said that after these stations start working, Russian military will no longer depend on the Mukachevo and Sevastopol radar stations in Ukraine.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Russia; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: military; missile; missileshield
Khmm...

Russian radars id washington DC? (Im not talking about Democrates)

1 posted on 03/20/2007 2:04:06 PM PDT by kronos77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kronos77

It will be interesting to see the reaction to this.


2 posted on 03/20/2007 2:06:29 PM PDT by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kronos77

Obsolete tech, but if they want to, they will have to meet FCC regs.


3 posted on 03/20/2007 2:08:35 PM PDT by RightWhale (Treaty rules;commerce droolz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

Actually if it is on land of the Embassy, techincaly it is territory of Russia, ang they have to obey only Russian regulations.


4 posted on 03/20/2007 2:12:59 PM PDT by kronos77 (-www.savekosovo.org- and -www.kosovo.net- Save Kosovo from Islam!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kronos77

If they mean to set up real detection systems (not simple "annoy the host country" units), then I have no problem with it.


5 posted on 03/20/2007 2:18:50 PM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kronos77; MoochPooch; Michael81Dus; Vicomte13; az_gila; Experiment 6-2-6; henkster; CT-Freeper; ...
Europe pinglist

If you want on or off, go to the link for instructions. Otherwise, it won't be guaranteed that you will be put on or taken off (it still won't be 100% guaranteed, anyway, but will be much more highly probable).

6 posted on 03/20/2007 2:18:53 PM PDT by Jedi Master Pikachu ( What is your take on Acts 15:20 (abstaining from blood) about eating meat? Could you freepmail?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kronos77

"Missile Shield Station"? That's a pretty funny term for "Missile Homing Beacon".


7 posted on 03/20/2007 2:24:42 PM PDT by Thrownatbirth (.....when the sidewalks are safe for the little guy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kronos77

That might be, but anything emitted from the property immediately trespasses on private or public property when it crosses the property line. That includes lights, boomboxes, and megawatt antimissile radar.


8 posted on 03/20/2007 3:26:02 PM PDT by RightWhale (Treaty rules;commerce droolz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kronos77

It may not be radar; journalists are pretty tech-impaired. Could be infrared, say in the 3-5 micron band, just looking for hot plumes. The atmosphere has enough transparency in certain parts of that band to allow viewing ~100 km or farther, depending on altitude and humidity. It's totally passive, just a fancy telescope and camera, plus computers and support equipment, no beams or emissions from the instrument.


9 posted on 03/20/2007 8:20:44 PM PDT by omnivore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: omnivore

Well, just a regular large searchlight with a clothing iron instead of a lamp, and shine on their blasted scope drom a nearby building.


10 posted on 03/21/2007 1:26:44 AM PDT by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: kronos77

should be interesting.


11 posted on 03/21/2007 11:08:31 AM PDT by Centurion2000 (If you're not being shot at, it's not a high stress job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

bump


12 posted on 03/21/2007 11:09:19 AM PDT by Centurion2000 (If you're not being shot at, it's not a high stress job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson