Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

G.W. Bush: The Only President Not Allowed to Fire US Attorneys
New Media Journal ^ | March 22, 2007 | Sher Zieve

Posted on 03/22/2007 7:40:39 PM PDT by CyberAnt

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
Finally, a member of the media is using the name properly .. DEMOCRAT PARTY and not democratic party.

I like the rest of what she had to say also .. and many others have been saying the same thing. I believe the dems have gone too far with this witch hunt against the WH. I called my rep, Feinstein today and politely told them this "witch hunt" against the WH was outrageous, and it saddened me to see the "esteemed senators" acting like petty little children. I got dead silence on the other end .. must have left a mark!!

1 posted on 03/22/2007 7:40:41 PM PDT by CyberAnt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt
The keelhauling that the Donks did to Scooter Libby worked so well, why not use the same thing on all of the White House staff? I just hope that GWB stands in the door on this one.
2 posted on 03/22/2007 7:46:09 PM PDT by ANGGAPO (LayteGulfBeachClub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt
You're absolutely right about this being a trumped up scandal. Unfortunately it is hard, as a conservative, to get motivated for the fight on this one for two reasons:

First, it may end up in the firing of Alberto Gonzales, who will go down in history with Ramsay Clark as one of the WORST attorneys general ever.

Second, Bush fired the wrong U.S. attorneys - he should've canned Johnny Sutton!

3 posted on 03/22/2007 7:46:50 PM PDT by lqclamar ("That's it, Seth, you can't blame them. It's want of education. That's all it is.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: CyberAnt
The central problem with this entire issue of US Attorney firings is that President Bush and members of his administration have not (as has sadly and dangerously been their penchant of late) fought back against the leftists.

The only thing sadder than this Dimwit publicity stunt is the administration's impotence in defending itself.

They need to send an articulate spokesperson up there and invoke McCarthy. Everytime a lawmaker starts fillibustering, this spokesperson needs to cut him short: "Sir, I am sorry but your subpoena requires that I appear as a witness, not a spectator for your political grandstanding. I will be happy to return when you want answers to your questions." Then walk out and hold a press conference in the lobby, accusing these folks of political opportunism in the extreme..

The Dims obviously can't do anything relevant, and they are going to fund the war. So they are trying to cover their asses with their base with smoke and mirrors. It could be that the administration is letting them get away with it because Bush doesn't want to endanger the war funding. But it is sad, oh so sad. The MSM is lapping it up hook line and sinker.

5 posted on 03/22/2007 7:55:42 PM PDT by massadvj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ANGGAPO

Yeah, me too. But Bush's statements reflect that he does see (FINALLY) that the dems are out to take down the whole admin if they can get away with it.

I believe the words "show trials" was the key that indicated the WH was on to their little Fitz deal.


6 posted on 03/22/2007 8:06:29 PM PDT by CyberAnt (Drive-By Media: Fake news, fake documents, fake polls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt

So much for San Nanny's fair and ethical congress... what a bunch of rotgut crumudgeons....can't believe what tripe America elects to government. Dems are stank and GOP is spineless....what a ship of fools in D.C.


7 posted on 03/22/2007 8:07:20 PM PDT by tflabo (Take authority that's ours)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TonyRo76

If it is as important(to him)as his illegal immigration program then I suspect he will stand his ground. Otherwise we will witness another 'backbone transplant' to the dems.


8 posted on 03/22/2007 8:07:27 PM PDT by biff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt

**G.W. Bush: The Only President Not Allowed to Fire US Attorneys **

It's the dimocrats' fault, this time.


9 posted on 03/22/2007 8:08:36 PM PDT by Salvation (?With God all things are possible.?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt

Is the Congress melting down?


10 posted on 03/22/2007 8:09:19 PM PDT by LiteKeeper (Beware the secularization of America; the Islamization of Eurabia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LiteKeeper
Yeh...let's melt the whole lot of them congress critters....
11 posted on 03/22/2007 8:14:25 PM PDT by tflabo (Take authority that's ours)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: LiteKeeper
Is the Congress melting down?

Could be. Leaky Lehey nearly had a stroke today. Maybe if they keep it up they will all become medical cases.

12 posted on 03/22/2007 8:21:33 PM PDT by Hattie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt

At least W has O'Reilly out there informing his audience that one of the fired attorneys was a Republican that nobody liked, another was a Democrat that the Democrats wanted removed. O'Reilly was mystified that the administration wasn't putting this info out.


13 posted on 03/22/2007 9:18:40 PM PDT by Nephi (Candidates have to convince voters that they won't be a continuation of W. What a legacy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt
They will keep pummeling the President and the administration and trying to strip away power as long as they are allowed to. It's long pass the time the President, as well as the GOP in the congress, should be kicking back.
14 posted on 03/22/2007 9:40:16 PM PDT by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt

He[President Bush] was the one who authorized the Fritzgerald fiasco.

He should have never did that. He also should never have appointed the 911 "Commission" whose sole purpose was to cover Bill Clinton's ass and implicate him.

He should have done battle with the Democrats from the first day he took office instead of kissing their asses.

The Democrats will never be satisfied with anything other that his total and complete destruction. And they will use any means at their disposal to accomplish this.

They have the same goals regarding Conservatives and Christians also.


15 posted on 03/22/2007 9:58:17 PM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: paul51; All

GREAT POINT!!

What we all need to do is contact our congress people (hopefully GOP), and rattle their cages a little. Either they stand up and support the President and the fact that this admin HAS DONE NOTHING WRONG IN FIRING 8 ATTORNEYS - or we'll pull the money plug and let them all fade into oblivion. If they like being out of power .. we can arrange it.

I'm sick of these lilly-livered do nothing congress people who don't have the courage to stand up WHEN IT'S TIME TO STAND UP - IT'S THE RIGHT THING TO DO. They don't have to support Bush .. they can just support the fact that the admin did not do anything illegal - NOTHING!! It's more than past time for the other members of the GOP to speak out and confront the dems on this FAKE AND PHONEY "SCANDAL".

If they can't stand up and defend what's right .. then they cannot expect us to stand up and defend them if need be.

GET OFF THE COUCH EVERYBODY .. TELL YOUR CONGRESS PEOPLE TO GET WITH THE PROGRAM.


16 posted on 03/22/2007 9:59:26 PM PDT by CyberAnt (Drive-By Media: Fake news, fake documents, fake polls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt

Did Bush fire all clinton's US attys when he took office in '01?


17 posted on 03/22/2007 10:29:12 PM PDT by uscabjd ( a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt

bttt


18 posted on 03/22/2007 10:32:46 PM PDT by Christian4Bush (Too bad these leftist advocates for abortion didn't practice what they preach on themselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: uscabjd

No! That's unfortunate but there may have been a good reason.

Because it took several weeks for the President to even get to the WH - what with the recount after recount after recount and trips to court, etc. .. hitting the ground running was important. To have to stop and regroup and select 93 attorneys and get them through the vetting process may have seemed like the last thing they wanted to do .. considering all the other items they were already behind on.

Of course, in hindsight .. it might have been a better solution. At least the GOP was still in charge of congress and hopefully would not have made a stink about it.


19 posted on 03/22/2007 10:39:25 PM PDT by CyberAnt (Drive-By Media: Fake news, fake documents, fake polls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt

Thanks. How many of clinton's US attys survived, and for how long. Didn't W eventually get rid of them?


20 posted on 03/22/2007 10:43:17 PM PDT by uscabjd ( a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson