Comprehensive List of Handguns *NOT* Outlawed by Mayor Rudy Giuliani

Squeaky 'The Armorer' ^ | 3/25/2007 | self

[The Spirit Of Allegiance]

These intensively researched sites expose the real Rudy.

In respect of copyrights, I have not posted the page contents but here are the links.

Main Expose'

Additional Testimony: (scroll down near the bottom)

Oh yeah, sure, it's all fun--until someone loses an eye their inalienable Constitutional Rights, their private property and their ability to defend themselves.

Serious thread:
Rudy Defends his gun lawsuit as Mayor (Video)

[The Spirit Of Allegiance]

Mods and FRiends, if this isn't activism to defend our Constitution, then I don't know what activism is.

[The Spirit Of Allegiance]

ping

[HangnJudge]

Cool Guns
A little impracticable though

[Al Simmons]

Hate to be a party-pooper, but there's far more important issues at stake in 2008 than hypothetical threats to the 2nd Amendment...like the War, Federal Judgeships, etc...

[mylife]

Hypothetical?
The man is a direct threat.

[Covenantor]

Cobbled together by someone unclear on the concept of bore sighting. Probably a DUmmie.

[Fiddlstix]

BTTT

[DJ Taylor]

"Hate to be a party-pooper, but there's far more important issues at stake in 2008 than hypothetical threats to the 2nd Amendment..."

You take our Constitution far too lightly.

[The Spirit Of Allegiance]

There's that boogeyman again. I ain't skeered.

It ALL matters, Al.

Don't mess with ANY of my Constitution!!!




I may take the time to do a Photoshop of your little cartoon in honor of your posting it to me here.

[oldenuff2no]

Hypothetical?
The man is a direct threat.

You got that right. He signed his name on litigation against the firearms makers because the were making too many guns over and above what cops and hunters needed.
That was his rational out of his own mouth.
The second amendment has nothing to do with cops or hunting. It is the right of the people to keep and bear arms. You may vote for a pig in a poke and hope things turn out kinda, maybe, OK. I will vote for the candidate who represents my constitutional rights and who will secure this country against all enemies foreign and domestic especially those who are Speaker of the House!!!!! Qusestio??? Have you ever heard a democrap talk about winning the war????

[Hydroshock]

I consider my constitutional rights and abortion to the issues number one and two. I will never vote for Rino Rudy.

[NY.SS-Bar9]

Agreed... and please tell us how Rudy would be any different from the beast.

Luckily neither of these clowns will ever hear "Hail to the Chief" anytime soon.

[The Mayor]

isn't that Al Gores gun?

[HangnJudge]

Other, very odd imagery here
from the same person, not for the faint of heart

surrealities

[Old Airplane Driver]

HR1022 is not hypothetical. I suggest you go to thomas.loc.gov and become familiar with it.

[GovernmentIsTheProblem]

"Hate to be a party-pooper, but there's far more important issues at stake in 2008 than hypothetical threats to the 2nd Amendment...like the War, Federal Judgeships, etc..."

How can we expect that liberal to defend our rights overseas when he won't recognize them at home?

Federal judges? Who will do what? Protect illegal aliens but seize our guns, like RUdy did?

You're worse than a party pooper. You're willing to (R)ah (R)ah away our rights so your "team" can win. Politics isn't sports!

[Old Sarge]

"Justice"?

[MrEdd]

without closed borders there is no future existence for the US I grew up in. Period. There would be no reason whatsoever to vote for either of the two candidates if the next election shaped up as you propose, because neither of those two would preserve a country worth defending.

I am a conservative. If conservatives are on the ballot I will vote for the best one, regardless of the party or lack thereof preceding the name. If republicans want the conservative vote, they will field a conservative candidate. If they field a liberal candidate and then whine like a 3 year old who wanted a toy and didn't get it when conservatives don't vote for their liberal, then they deserve to lose - because they chose to discard the conservative vote.

Preemptive whining now does not entitle a liberal to claim the vote of conservatives no matter what he or she puts before their name.

[VaRepublican]

Be careful Mr. Ed the rudy bots are watching.

[Charlespg]

Be careful Mr. Ed the rudy bots are watching.

They will be along to whine and complain soon enough about people who don't trust rudy are not consertives,bla, bla, ect.