Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/27/2007 11:17:05 AM PDT by thackney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: thackney
They have a lot of good info on their website also.

http://www.fce.com/


2 posted on 03/27/2007 11:30:57 AM PDT by P-40 (Al Qaeda was working in Iraq. They were just undocumented.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

I once worked across the street from FCE, the place was always catching on fire for one reason or another.


3 posted on 03/27/2007 11:45:05 AM PDT by MrNeutron1962
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

I once worked across the street from FCE, the place was always catching on fire for one reason or another.


4 posted on 03/27/2007 11:45:11 AM PDT by MrNeutron1962
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney
The Connecticut Clean Energy Fund selected Danbury, Conn.-based FuelCell for six power projects that would total about 68 megawatts, the company said Tuesday. The deal would be valued at $200 million if all the projects are approved, FuelCell said.

That's nearly $3 million per MW installed. Pretty damn pricey.

5 posted on 03/27/2007 11:52:15 AM PDT by Ditto (Global Warming: The 21st Century's Snake Oil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

What energy source do they use to produce the hydrogen and oxygen?


7 posted on 03/27/2007 11:59:45 AM PDT by Right Wing Assault ("..this administration is planning a 'Right Wing Assault' on values and ideals.." - John Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

I used to work for their competitor, UTC (aka International Fuel Cells). I worked in life extension of PAFCs and also with contamination issues with MCFCs.

I suspect that the Direct FuelCell is either molten carbonate (MCFC) or solid oxide (SOFC). When I left (18 years ago) there were some serious materials issues with MCFCs and SOFCs. However, if the materials issues were solved then either of these were the way to go for specialty applications.

MCFCs were somewhat intolerant of sulfur and chloride compounds, and these would have to be scrubbed from the natural gas first.

These are both great for specialty applications. Using MCFCs or SOFCs for baseload power is rather senseless. The dirty little secret is that it takes almost as much energy to make a MCFC as it will produce in its useful life.


9 posted on 03/27/2007 12:25:20 PM PDT by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RaceBannon; scoopscandal; 2Trievers; LoneGOPinCT; Rodney King; sorrisi; MrSparkys; monafelice; ...

Connecticut ping!

Please Freepmail me if you want on or off my infrequent Connecticut ping list.

11 posted on 03/28/2007 8:09:46 PM PDT by nutmeg (The Democrats' "new direction" for Iraq: SURRENDER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson