The Gathering Storm Against Giuliani (Known Pro-Life Activists vow to oppose him in the GENERAL)

CBN ^ | 3-28-07 | David Brody

[TitansAFC]

---"Don't think for a second that these activists aren't serious. They are."---

I sure am. I'd much rather lose than have Rudy win. I know that I am not alone.

[TitansAFC]

ping.

[EternalVigilance]

Had to happen, as I've said all along.

The alternative is for America to be stuck with two evil parties, and no conservative party.

[Calpernia]

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1746434/posts
Last Chance for Right to Life Act HR 552 (Congressional Action Alert)

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1781684/posts
Duncan Hunter proposes Right to Life Bill

[dirtboy]

A few months ago, I thought I could vote for Rudy, but not McVain. Now I think the opposite is true. I don't see McVain driven to abuse power. I do see that tendency very strongly in Rudy. Rudy also seems to believe he is above the law. Combine the two, and IMO he would be a very dangerous man to have in the Oval Office.

[Calpernia]

Harvesting Fetal Body Parts

[Calpernia]

Prolife

[Buck W.]

"Rudy also seems to believe he is above the law."
Replace "Rudy" with "Bush", "Cheney", "Rove", etc., and your quote could have come from the progressive democrat book of talking points.

[tkathy]

Another election when the big thinkers are working to defeat republicans.

[freedomfiter2]

A few months ago, I thought I could vote for Rudy, but not McVain. Now I think the opposite is true. I don't see McVain driven to abuse power. I do see that tendency very strongly in Rudy. Rudy also seems to believe he is above the law.


I agree. I thought I'd never vote for McCain, but now I see there are worse alternatives. Giuliani is scary in the same way Hillary is although he's not as shrill.

[Alberta's Child]

Thanks for the ping, Titans . . .

And if anyone here thinks the statements you see there at the top of this thread are harsh, just remember that gun rights advocates are even MORE zealous over their major issue than the pro-life folks are.

[rom]

Not that I'm a huge Rudy fan or anything, but you'd rather have "Evil" (as admitted to by this email) run the country than "Stupid"?

Sorry... but this just proves how "Stupid" this composer of this email is.

We see what ceding control of the Congress has done for us. I thought the Republican Congress was inept and out of control (spending wise), but the Democrats promise to show us a whole new level of insanity as we've seen in the last few months since they were "throned".

Maybe some day we will have 60% conservatives in Congress and Reagan reincarnated as President.

But until then, you can bet that Planned Parenthood is going to get more and more dough from Ms. Pelosi and Ms. Clinton (or Mr. Obama). And your taxes will go up. And you will have more pork and a bigger welfare state. Perhaps the Fairness Doctrine will rear its ugly head again. Cut and Run from every part of the globe. Our troops will get the shaft (more like dagger in their backs). Terrorist acts against those of us who are Born, as well as those who are Unborn. Allowing all of that is just plain Evil IMHO.

[TitansAFC]

---"Another election when the big thinkers are working to defeat republicans.'---

Dude, seriously - if it's Rudy, I'm with them.

There is no victory with Rudy running the GOPp - none. Zip, zero, nada.

[dforest]

I never thought that McCain could look better. But I must agree with you.

[dirtboy]

Replace "Rudy" with "Bush", "Cheney", "Rove", etc., and your quote could have come from the progressive democrat book of talking points.

Except for the fact that Rudy HAS acted above the law quite often.

He defied a court order to end NYC's sanctuary city policy.

He carted off his official records away from public access, in defiance of the law.

And he released a police shooting victim's juvenile records without a court order.

He shows the same contempt for open records laws as the Clintons. And also shows the same propensity to make illegal use of what should be confidential records to attack opponents.

[Calpernia]

I believe you are confusing the Log Cabin Republicans with Conservatives.

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Log_Cabin_Republicans
Log Cabin Republicans campaigned AGAINST Bush in 2004.

Log Cabin (Republicans) need to account for where they got the money to fund the $1M ad campaign against President Bush in 2004 in key battleground states. This is a Federally-regulated organization (IRS and FEC rules apply!), but they have never documented where this money came from.

[The South Texan]

"Another election when the big thinkers are working to defeat republicans."


Yep. Republicans love to eat their own, especially if it leads to the election of you know who.

All in the name of teaching the Republicans a lesson.

I hope these "All or Nothings" are happy when SHE takes the oath in January 2009 and thugs like Chavez, the nut job in Iran, Bin Laden, etc. send their congratulatory messages.

[trisham]

And if anyone here thinks the statements you see there at the top of this thread are harsh, just remember that gun rights advocates are even MORE zealous over their major issue than the pro-life folks are.

**************

Yes. There are a number of very good reasons to oppose Giuliani.

[dmw]

The liberal Rudybot fans will be here soon to remind us that they don't need us anymore. As someone told me yesterday, the republican party doesn't need social conservatives anymore to win elections, and according to them, no amount of grassroots effort is going to change that.

Here's a quote from FReeper massadvj:

"Inside the party they know that a social conservative cannot win this year. The stars have realigned, and that is that."

Yeah, let's see how the liberal RINO's do without our support!