Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: supercat
On the other hand, slaves would have required considerable upkeep, would they not?

What upkeep would they really require? Food was rudimentary and grown or raised on the plantation iteslf, by slave labor. Clothing was nothing fancy and certainly not expensive. Slave housing was not a recurring expense. The upkeep of a slave amounted to very little and in return you got an investment who worked for free, could be sold for a good profit, and who if paired with another slave could crank out additional assets every 9 months or so.

76 posted on 03/31/2007 8:02:25 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur (Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur
The upkeep of a slave amounted to very little and in return you got an investment who worked for free, could be sold for a good profit, and who if paired with another slave could crank out additional assets every 9 months or so.

Nine months is unrealistic when nursing babies. Once the babies are weaned, or they had a wet nurse, the mothers could resume ovulation once her prolactin level decreased enough.

157 posted on 03/31/2007 4:53:25 PM PDT by neverdem (May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson