Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US Senators Introduce Bill to Nationalize California Tailpipe Greenhouse Gas Standard
www.greencarcongress.com ^ | 04/02/2007 | Staff

Posted on 04/02/2007 8:08:16 AM PDT by Red Badger

US Senators Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe (both R-ME) have introduced a measure (S.1073) that would require automakers to reduce new vehicle greenhouse gas emissions 30% below 2002 levels by 2016. This would nationalize California’s motor vehicle greenhouse gas reduction standard. The EPA would be required to tighten the reductions every five years.

The bill also requires fuel suppliers to increase the percentage of low-carbon fuels—biodiesel, cellulosic ethanol E85, hydrogen, electricity, and others—in the motor vehicle fuel supply by 2015. This would reduce emissions from motor vehicle fuels by 10% below projected levels by 2030.

It’s clear that if we are serious about addressing the global warming challenge, reducing emissions from the use of motor vehicles must be a top priority. With more than 240 million vehicles on the road, this one sector alone produces 32% of all US greenhouse gas emissions. So, this legislation would slash emissions from this sector by 22% below anticipated levels by 2030. —Senator Feinstein

California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger announced his support for this legislation and urged members of Congress to pass the legislation immediately. Earlier this year, Schwarzenegger ordered a Low Carbon Fuel Standard bill to require fuel producers in California to reduce emissions of carbon dioxide and other global warming gases on a full lifecycle basis by 10% by 2020. (Earlier post.)

Other components of the bill include:

*

By 2009, EPA must quantify the total emissions of each fuel, including emissions created during production, transportation, and end-use (or the lifecycle of a fuel). *

EPA to develop a fuel labeling process to provide this information to consumers at the pump. *

By 2015, require oil refiners and importers to reduce the greenhouse gas emissions of the entire motor vehicle fuel pool by 3% below 2007 levels. Each five years thereafter, fuel providers would have to reduce emissions of the motor vehicle fuel pool by another 3% below the current level in that year. *

Establish a carbon-credit trading program to help fuel providers meet the emissions reduction target levels. *

Require automakers to optimize vehicles that run on gasoline and low-carbon fuels to achieve better fuel economy when powered by low-carbon fuels. Currently, these vehicles are optimized to run on traditional gasoline. *

Require automakers to use a green fuel cap for all vehicles powered by low-carbon fuels. This would alert consumers that these vehicles can use low-carbon fuels.

Senator Feinstein has also introduced legislation for a national cap-and trade program for the electricity sector (S.317); and increasing the fuel economy for cars, trucks and SUVs by 10 miles per gallon over 10 years (S.357). Two other bills, a national cap-and-trade program for the industrial sector and a national energy efficiency program are in progress.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; US: California; US: Maine
KEYWORDS: carbondioxide; globalwarming; greenhousegas; greenhousegases

1 posted on 04/02/2007 8:08:19 AM PDT by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I guess Congress isn't satisfied that the US automobile industry isn'nt going bankrupt fast enough.


2 posted on 04/02/2007 8:11:46 AM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Veritas. Gravitas. Ohmygas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

The United State of America has jumped the shark. And it pains me to say it...SSZ


3 posted on 04/02/2007 8:13:11 AM PDT by szweig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Attacking the US consumer is what liberals are all about. All done in the name of a hoax.


4 posted on 04/02/2007 8:20:23 AM PDT by lormand (Liberals - the barbarians of our time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Why is nobody talking about the global warming on other planets?
5 posted on 04/02/2007 8:21:53 AM PDT by Vision ("Delight yourself with the Lord, and he will give you the desires of your heart." Psalm37:4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Any chance that the Earth will have a seizure and vomit California and Maine into the seas?


6 posted on 04/02/2007 8:22:03 AM PDT by bikerMD (Beware, the light at the end of the tunnel may be a muzzle flash.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

This is how a country goes down the tubes.


7 posted on 04/02/2007 8:22:10 AM PDT by sionnsar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vision

Why is nobody talking about the global warming on other planets?.......No money AND no votes there...........


8 posted on 04/02/2007 8:24:30 AM PDT by Red Badger (If it's consensus, it's not science. If it's science, there's no need for consensus......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

What these idiots look for is something to change within the next 5-10 years. In a hundred years, without their intervention, we won't even have cars or trucks. Look how much the automobile has changed since it short history. What they need to be doing is looking out much farther. But, Diane Finklestien is more concerned about her husbands construction company and how it will make money off of the tax payer as it is in Iraq.


9 posted on 04/02/2007 8:25:20 AM PDT by RC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bikerMD

California could always plunge into the sea, but Maine?...........


10 posted on 04/02/2007 8:26:05 AM PDT by Red Badger (If it's consensus, it's not science. If it's science, there's no need for consensus......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Who gave them permission to leave the kitchen???


11 posted on 04/02/2007 8:35:05 AM PDT by Niteranger68 (Osama's mama wears combat sandals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
It’s clear that if we are serious about addressing the global warming challenge, reducing emissions from the use of motor vehicles must be a top priority. With more than 240 million vehicles on the road, this one sector alone produces 32% of all US greenhouse gas emissions. So, this legislation would slash emissions from this sector by 22% below anticipated levels by 2030. —Senator Feinstein

Her husband must be heavily invested in some of these scams.

12 posted on 04/02/2007 8:38:35 AM PDT by johniegrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
This will only raise costs of vehicles and the cost of running them. The burden of compliance will fall most on those who can afford it least. In practical terms it will mean that lower and middle income drivers will choose to repair their old cars more frequently than in the past. This means that fewer new cars will be sold, and the car fleet in general will be grow older than it otherwise would have.

It should go without saying that older cars pollute more and have fewer safety improvement. So, where we go again. Liberal "solutions" that just have the opposite effect than the benefits that were claimed.

13 posted on 04/02/2007 9:17:01 AM PDT by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Maine can stay as long as Snowe and Collins happen to be in California on Vomitus Eruptus Day.


14 posted on 04/02/2007 10:32:00 AM PDT by bikerMD (Beware, the light at the end of the tunnel may be a muzzle flash.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: theBuckwheat
That is exactly what will happen. Unintended consequences.... heh.. can't beat that law. Same goes for banning incandescent light bulbs for compact flourescent light bulbs... They didn't think about the mercury did they??? How on earth do we dispose of that EEEEEVIL mercury...

good work nut jobs....

15 posted on 04/02/2007 1:13:33 PM PDT by erikm88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

We don’t yet get it. They [the environmental radicals] have hijacked the environmental movement, including regulation of so-called greenhouse gases, not to improve the environment, but to espouse and put into place, by regulation and decree, their false vision of how man should live his life, by their tenents and values, their rules, limiting his free choice and limiting the marketplace to whatever products they deem socially acceptable according to their environmental norms.


16 posted on 04/02/2007 7:02:48 PM PDT by CedarDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger; Killing Time; Beowulf; Mr. Peabody; RW_Whacko; honolulugal; SideoutFred; Ole Okie; ...


FReepmail me to get on or off
Click on POGW graphic for full GW rundown


As the "Big Lie" bites down on your wallet, harder and harder...
17 posted on 04/03/2007 3:30:31 AM PDT by xcamel (Press to Test, Release to Detonate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mad_Tom_Rackham
I guess Congress isn't satisfied that the US automobile industry isn'nt going bankrupt fast enough.

Create a problem, blame someone else for it, spend others money to fix it, then create another problem generated in the fix of the first problem, blame someone else for it, spend others money to fix it again, repeat this until death and you will die understanding the dogma of liberal politics.

18 posted on 04/03/2007 3:49:02 AM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson