Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Well, that will make three carrier groups in the Middle East. It was a sight to see, watching the group leave. The fact remains, we need more troops in the US military -- especially if we are going to fight the "real" war with every single country in the Middle East. (They are all housing terrorists.) Where are we going to get enough soldiers to fight for the next several years? I know we're against the draft for political reasons -- but how about for the purpose of victory?
1 posted on 04/02/2007 7:09:29 PM PDT by Sleeping Beauty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Sleeping Beauty
I think there's a fourth carrier group nearby.

Four carriers, plus long-range bombers could put a big hurt on Iran. I smell an ultimatum coming their way. I don't see us putting boots on the ground there, but I wouldn't be surprised to see smouldering military installations.

2 posted on 04/02/2007 7:16:05 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Enoch Powell was right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sleeping Beauty

Enough’s enough. Captain Geo - you have our support. Just blast the living **** out of them!!! Back to the stone ages - which is where most of them would be - if it weren’t for the oil under their sand dunes.


4 posted on 04/02/2007 7:42:25 PM PDT by ImProudToBeAnAmerican (Tom Daschle is deeply saddened... Remember him? Bahahahahahahahahaha!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sleeping Beauty

Nothing could make victory more difficult than to use a draft. Nothing.


5 posted on 04/02/2007 7:50:59 PM PDT by bill1952 ("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sleeping Beauty

God bless, protect, and keep safe each and every one aboard those vessels.

Now — kick afterburners!


7 posted on 04/02/2007 8:19:14 PM PDT by Shadowstrike (Be polite, Be professional, but have a plan to kill everyone you meet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sleeping Beauty
I know we're against the draft for political reasons -- but how about for the purpose of victory?

What's the difference? Haven't you notice the Rats are defunding the war for partisan reasons?

8 posted on 04/02/2007 9:04:59 PM PDT by TheDon (The DemocRAT party is the party of TREASON! Overthrow the terrorist's congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sleeping Beauty; potlatch; devolve; ntnychik; Grampa Dave; gonzo; dixiechick2000

HASTA LA VISTA, PRESIDENT ALOUD JIHADINUTJOB

10 posted on 04/02/2007 9:21:50 PM PDT by PhilDragoo (Hitlery: das Butch von Buchenvald)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sleeping Beauty
7. Would you support or oppose a joint US-European military intervention in Iran?

Support 56%

Oppose 38%

13 posted on 04/02/2007 11:19:58 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican (Everyone that doesn't like what America and President Bush has done for Iraq can all go to HELL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sleeping Beauty; SJackson; yonif; Simcha7; American in Israel; Slings and Arrows; judicial meanz; ..
The nuclear powered aircraft carrier USS Nimitz currently underway off the coast of Hawaii in the Pacific Ocean, May 15, 2005. The Nimitz Carrier Strike Group is on a regularly scheduled deployment in support of the global war on terrorism.

Nothin' cooler than a U.S. Navy carrier under way.  !







AMERICA AT WAR
At Salem the Soldier's Homepage ~
Free Republic's News From the Long War
Islam, a Religion of Peace®? Some links...  by backhoe
Translated Pre-War IRAQ Documents  by jveritas
Mohammed, The Mad Poet Quoted....  by PsyOp
"PLAES DO NOT TOCH THE WAR"  by AnnaZ
One FReeper On The Line  by SNOWFLAKE
The Clash of Ideologies - A Review

"...It's time we recognized the nature of the conflict. It's total war and we are all involved. Nobody on our side is exempted because of age, gender, or handicap. The Islamofacists have stolen childhood from the world." [FReeper Retief]

"...That the totalitarian force pitted against freedom wears a religious makes this civil war among mankind all the more difficult to engage. Loving freedom as we do, it seems reprehensible to deliberate against a religion. But this is no ordinary religion as it demands absolute obedience of all to their religion at the cost of freedom itself." [FReeper Backtothestreets]

American Flag





Click The Pic To Donate

16 posted on 04/03/2007 6:02:36 AM PDT by Salem (FREE REPUBLIC - Fighting to win within the Arena of the War of Ideas! So get in the fight!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sleeping Beauty; Salem
3 carrier groups? The article says the Nimitz is relieving the Eisenhower, although it doesn't say where the Ike will go next. Or if it will stay there in more of a support role, perhaps.

President Bush ratcheted up the rhetoric over the incident last week, calling the detainees “hostages” – a term not even the British had used.

Heavens no, let's not refer to them accurately, nosiree...rolling eyes!

Salem, carrier groups are truly awesome. Just one more example of the finest military on the planet.

17 posted on 04/03/2007 6:14:04 AM PDT by prairiebreeze (Iran needs a good swift kick in the teeth. Or ten.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sleeping Beauty
The Nimitz will join the San Diego-based John C. Stennis Strike Group and relieve the Dwight D. Eisenhower, according to Naval Air Forces Public Affairs.

Twenty-six years ago later this month will be the anniversary of the ill fated rescue mission to free the U.S. Embassy hostages in Tehran. The mission, in large part, was launched from the Nimitz. My brother-in-law, a Navy pilot flying the E-2C Hawkeye was assigned to the Eisenhower. The Eisenhower, based in Norfolk, was assigned to relieve the Nimitz ... and was steaming north thru the southern Indian Ocean (having just rounded the Cape of Good Hope) when the strike was launched from the Nimitz. Both carriers remained on station in the Arabian Sea for a brief period before the Nimitz returned to her home port. The 'Ike' CVG-69 remained at sea for nine months on that deployment, one of the longest stints at sea for a carrier since WWII. It's interesting that 26 years later (most of the crew on both these carriers hadn't been born yet) the same two carriers are again sailing these waters. Only this time it's the Nimitz relieving the Eisenhower.

18 posted on 04/03/2007 6:31:12 AM PDT by BluH2o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sleeping Beauty

God bless our troops.


20 posted on 04/03/2007 6:47:04 AM PDT by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sleeping Beauty

Ah. Remember watching a carrier battle group steam out of the Golden Gate while having dinner in Sausilito. What a sight.

Sorry but I can’t support a draft. You don’t defend freedom by enslaving our citizens.


21 posted on 04/03/2007 6:49:39 AM PDT by Kozak (Anti Shahada: " There is no God named Allah, and Muhammed is his False Prophet")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sleeping Beauty

One Tico and a bunch of Arleigh Burke’s. All of which can carry Tomahawks. Hmmmm....


22 posted on 04/03/2007 6:52:45 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sleeping Beauty
Great ship named after a great man.


23 posted on 04/03/2007 6:55:08 AM PDT by New Perspective (Proud father of a 3 year old son with Down Syndrome)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sleeping Beauty

This all sounds like Iran will soon be gasoline free.
The need to leave the oil pumps and distribution system in place, but with Iran only having ONE gasoline refinery, it wouldn’t be hard to make the chief mode of Iranian transportation donkeys.


27 posted on 04/03/2007 9:43:22 AM PDT by BuffaloJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: magslinger

‘Nother one about the Nimitz


29 posted on 04/03/2007 10:55:55 AM PDT by Vroomfondel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sleeping Beauty
but how about for the purpose of victory?

Sure!

It would be reinstated, if the need existed.

The need will have to be more than terrorism. It would be a wide scale war against a State or States where hundreds of thousands of troops may be needed.

it will happen, if the need becomes a reality. needing a few thousand, is not enough to trigger the draft. they have many ways of increasing the number of volunteers by using the resources of the Fed.

32 posted on 04/03/2007 11:57:19 AM PDT by Cold Heat (Mitt....2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Vroomfondel; SC Swamp Fox; Fred Hayek; NY Attitude; P3_Acoustic; Bean Counter; investigateworld; ...
SONOBUOY PING!

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

Post or FReepmail me if you wish to be enlisted in or discharged from the Navair Pinglist.
This is a medium volume pinglist.

33 posted on 04/03/2007 1:11:43 PM PDT by magslinger (Submission? That's a bit of a problem!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson