Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Girls Gone Wild' Boss in Jail (Arrested in Fla)
http://www.cbs47.tv/entertainment/story.aspx?content_id=9c8893a1-e28f-4103-8a65-6bc681d8d6bf ^ | 4/10/07 | staff

Posted on 04/10/2007 9:08:57 AM PDT by Rb ver. 2.0

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181 next last
To: NorthFlaRebel
Yeh, many people are misunderstanding this case. Across the net, half the people who post on this don’t grasp this is a civil case. The judge sounds loony. I’ve never heard of such a situation. Did Francis sign an agreement waving the right to a trial or something? I just don’t get it otherwise. Doesn’t he have the right to not settle if he doesn’t want to? I thought you could decide not to settle up until the moment you sign the papers.

I understand that he had the option of a trial, but elected to a settlement instead. He agreed to a settlement, but threw a tantrum when it came time to sign it. The judge ruled that he wasn't bargaining in good faith and threatened to find him in contempt over the tantrum. He then threw a second tantrum and left the state.

41 posted on 04/10/2007 9:54:54 AM PDT by mbynack (Retired USAF SMSgt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Rb ver. 2.0
Hey US Senate! Since you support al-Qaeda, lets get that Sharia Law in force so we can send all these females home and put them in their berkas.
42 posted on 04/10/2007 9:56:33 AM PDT by YOUGOTIT (The Greatest Threat to our Security is the US Senate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PAR35

If a settlement was reached and agreed to, what was there to mediate? Wouldn’t an agreement nullify the need to mediate?

Wouldn’t a judge be overstepping to jail a person for a moot order?


43 posted on 04/10/2007 9:56:47 AM PDT by Just sayin (Is is what it is, for if it was anything else, it would be isn't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

Comment #44 Removed by Moderator

To: cripplecreek

What about the underage girls, because from what I understand that is what the charges are for.


45 posted on 04/10/2007 9:58:52 AM PDT by YoungSoutherner (To be young and conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Rb ver. 2.0

Isn’t this the guy that had someone break into his house, take videos of him in uncompromising positions and having to say things to make it sound like he was gay?

They eventually caught the guy but I think Karma is a B&*%^ch.
It wasn’t a disgruntled dad, just a blackmailer that I think he met through Paris Hilton.


46 posted on 04/10/2007 10:00:11 AM PDT by Lx (Do you like it, do you like it. Scott? I call it Mr. and Mrs. Tennerman chili.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lucius Vorenus

You said — “These girls whored themselves three times: First, when they created [& then presented] the fraudulent identification papers; second, when they accepted the original payment from Francis; and third, when they went back to the till for the civil lawsuit payment.”

Just a comment, not directed specifically at you, but to everyone, in general...

Well, these girls (and hundreds of thousands of others in this country) are doing the very same thing, for free, no papers to sign, no ID to present, with many private “filming parties” going on at many of the parties they go to. You’ll probably find many of these girls “on film” with many of the guys carrying around video cameras and distributing these films for free.

I would say that for every filming that you have with this outfit, who are supposed to meet strict legal guidelines for doing these videos, there is (at the very same time) about 1,000 other filmings going on, with significant numbers of underage girls (that same night), doing it for simply the heck of it (and because “that’s what everyone is doing...”).

I would call them s&f parties (if you don’t know... s**k and f**k parties), that’s how bad it is...

So, the problem is not so much Girls Gone Wild, nope — the real problem is in the society, or more specifically, within that 13-18 year-old age group.

I would stop blaming this guy for the ills of society and start blaming the parents, and then *also* the kids themselves...

You might want to check out a movie “Kids” —

http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00004YA6G/

Regards,
Star Traveler


47 posted on 04/10/2007 10:01:21 AM PDT by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Just sayin

The overiding factor is that he is a predator plying girls with drinks....

In many cases, these girls are underage and had never stated they were anything but....

People invest money with Con Artists then regret their “poor choice”

This guy is no different except he deals in porn and preys on the young....


48 posted on 04/10/2007 10:02:53 AM PDT by nevergore (?It could be that the purpose of my life is simply to serve as a warning to others.?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Lucius Vorenus

Sounds like that bill would include the mediator and the plaintiff’s attorney’s fees for an aborted mediation. If mediators are getting that much a day there, I need to move and change jobs.

He’s getting hammered for walking out of the mediation, per the story posted here. If he’s got a settlement agreement all signed up, it should get him out of jail. I’ll bet he doesn’t.


49 posted on 04/10/2007 10:03:38 AM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: YoungSoutherner

You said — “What about the underage girls, because from what I understand that is what the charges are for.”

Yeah, and what about all the other 13-18 year-olds, doing it for free, no ID required, no paperwork to meet — at all the s&F parties going on. I would say that on any particular night, you would probably have about 1,000 others going on across the country, anywhere from two or three to a whole group, with someone filming. It’s pretty rampant out there and there are lots of videos being made privately (or not so private, when they get on the Internet)...

Regards,
Star Traveler


50 posted on 04/10/2007 10:04:41 AM PDT by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

Comment #51 Removed by Moderator

To: nickcarraway

Agreed. I never believe in the dicta of “in vino veritas” or that inebriation has no effect on the ability to consent clearly. There’s a avery good reason why contracts are null and void if the person who signed it is under the influence.

If these girls are, then their “contract” is null and void.


52 posted on 04/10/2007 10:06:54 AM PDT by Killborn (Age of servitude. A government of the traitors, by the liars, for the sheep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: PAR35

The “girls” got a financial settlement from this guy. Won’t they love their children seeing the Girls Gone Wild when they are in their 40’s?!!! thank God the internet wasn’t around when I was in college-many party nights where who knows what might have occured if cameras were rolling!!!


53 posted on 04/10/2007 10:07:12 AM PDT by LYSandra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: All

Now, what is more destructive: an underage girl flashing her boobs, or a 26 year old female teacher having sex with an underage male student ? Freep threads seem to laugh off the latter, while I can assure you I would get Medieval on any whore who molested my child. The double standard is sickening.


54 posted on 04/10/2007 10:09:06 AM PDT by Maverick68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: nevergore

You said — “The overiding factor is that he is a predator plying girls with drinks....”

I seriously doubt that. These kinds of girls are going to parties and drinking on their own. Many of them will do so with fake ID. And if not that, then others (friends or acquaintances) are getting it for them. It doesn’t take a “predator” to get these girls drunk these days. Just send a girl out to a “party” and she’ll be getting drunk on her own...

You also said — “In many cases, these girls are underage and had never stated they were anything but....”

Yeah, and the same thing is going on with many 13-18 year-olds around the country. Everyone around them knows that they are that age or under. It doesn’t bother anyone at these s&f parties that these girls go to — and also go to knowing what happens at them, too.

It’s about time that the blame gets put on these kids who are doing these things and going to these kinds of parties. They seem to “revel” in doing these things — and even revel more at the thousands of other “free filmings” that they engage in at these very same parties...

Regards,
Star Traveler


55 posted on 04/10/2007 10:09:50 AM PDT by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: All

This is a civil case.

No jail other than for contempt.

He is in jail because he was stupid enough to fall for a lawyer’s trick. These are plaintiff’s lawyers who are playing games to get money.

You can’t go to jail for not reaching settlement many mediations fail. The mediator signs off indicating an impass and the parties go to trial.

People have stormed out of mediations. Lawyers have intentionally impassed trials in order to go to jury trials thinking they will do better. (and then they jury comes back with zero)

we are not getting the full story.


56 posted on 04/10/2007 10:11:23 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maverick68

I assure you, neither is a luaghing matter to me. If there is true justice, the man who plies underage girls with drinks and the teacher abusing children will meet the same fate either in prison or in the chamber.


57 posted on 04/10/2007 10:11:55 AM PDT by Killborn (Age of servitude. A government of the traitors, by the liars, for the sheep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Just sayin
Had these girls not presented ID’s saying they were older than they were, I would be far more in agreement with you on this issue than I am currently.

This film company has been sentenced to pay $1.6 million in criminal fines for failing to create and maintain age and identity records from the time period of the underage girls. How confident are you that realistic looking Identification was presented?

58 posted on 04/10/2007 10:14:02 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Maverick68

You said — “Now, what is more destructive: an underage girl flashing her boobs, or a 26 year old female teacher having sex with an underage male student ? Freep threads seem to laugh off the latter, while I can assure you I would get Medieval on any whore who molested my child. The double standard is sickening.”

The trouble is, that the culture that the girls are presently raised in — and *especially* if they are going to public school (and many times in private schools, too) — these girls actually “revel” in being filmed at doing lots of things with guys, in much more destructive ways than simply flashing boobs (and that’s not necessarily such a good thing, itself, either — because it represents a mentality for them, which leads them down more destructive paths).

So, these girls (and many girls of parents *here* on Free Republic) are engaging in these s&f parties and being filmed for free, because it’s the rage and the fun thing to do these days. There’s no problem with them. They seem to think it’s okay (even though it’s destructive to them). As I’ve said in several other posts, there are probably 1,000 other private (really “not so private”) filmings going on with 13-18 year-old girls on any night of the week. One of them could be your daughter on any one particular night. And, you’re not going to know anything about it.

Regards,
Star Traveler


59 posted on 04/10/2007 10:15:33 AM PDT by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Just sayin

“This world needs more personal responsibility...”

I would agree. Joe Francis must accept personal responsibility.


60 posted on 04/10/2007 10:17:22 AM PDT by This Just In
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson