Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FDA attempting to control Vitamins and Minerals
FDA Website ^ | 4-11-07 | Halgr

Posted on 04/11/2007 8:50:18 AM PDT by Halgr

At the link provided you will see that the FDA is trying to sneak past the public in an attempt to control certain vitamins and minerals.

Please, if you feel as concerned as I do, make comments at this site to the FDA on your thoughts regarding this continued "Nanny State" invasion of America.

I have Lupus and modern medical science doesn't offer many solutions to my condition, whereas, I find a great deal of relief in certain B-complex vitamins and certain minerals.

I am frightened of the possibilies people like me could face if the FDA enacts this "Guidance for Industry"

I have contacted all my congress critters and others.

Additionally, the general public can make comments at the URL above.

Thanks FReepers

Halgri


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: fda; minerals; vitamins; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

1 posted on 04/11/2007 8:50:19 AM PDT by Halgr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Halgr

The FDA is barely capable of doing what it is supposed to be doing as it is, and they want more control? I say NO, and that also goes for Kennedy and Waxman’s cockamammy idea of putting tobacco under FDA control.


2 posted on 04/11/2007 8:52:39 AM PDT by Gabz (I like mine with lettuce and tomato, heinz57 and french-fried potatoes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Halgr

Here we go again. I think Senator Hatch led the charge to stop them last time. I suspect that Congressman Waxman from California somehow has a hand in this.


3 posted on 04/11/2007 8:54:08 AM PDT by 3AngelaD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Halgr

Are you aware that many of the so-called “food supplements” that are out there, which are supposed to contain certain minerals or chemicals, such as glucosamine or plant extracts like St. John’s Wort, really have nothing or near nothing that they advertise, in them? Some facets of this industry must be regulated in order to protect the public from shysters and snake oil salesmen........


4 posted on 04/11/2007 8:54:33 AM PDT by Red Badger (If it's consensus, it's not science. If it's science, there's no need for consensus......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Halgr

The Announcements sidebar is reserved for FR business.

Not this.

Thanks,
AM


5 posted on 04/11/2007 8:55:11 AM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Halgr

If so, then I think it’s great. Far and away the biggest problem with the health supplements industry is that there’s no regulatory oversight and, quite frequently, what is claimed to be in a supplement is not actually there or is contaminated.

What I’d support is manufacturing quality standards and a standardized ‘seal of approval’ for those who meet them. If one still wants to produce or to consume unsanctioned whatever then they will be free to do so.


6 posted on 04/11/2007 8:55:25 AM PDT by AntiGuv ("..I do things for political expediency.." - Sen. John McCain on FOX News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Exactly! Even from pill to pill, the composition and volume may vary.


7 posted on 04/11/2007 8:56:11 AM PDT by najida (Just call me a chicken rancher :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Gabz

Big drug and pharmaceutical companies are the ones pushing this. They want to be able to control those radical products. They are trying to convince Congress to give them that authority. They don’t make enough from $4-$30 per pill drugs.


8 posted on 04/11/2007 8:59:25 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Halgr

The key here is this

>>As with botanicals and probiotics, the classification of a “functional food” under the Act is based primarily on the product’s intended use and may also involve other factors, depending on the elements of the statutory definition of a particular product category.<<

They don’t plan to restrict vitamins - they plan (and already do) regulate and forbid supplements that make unproven or false claims.

You can sell vitamins and herbs - you can’t claim they cure cancer or impotence or anything else without proof and going through the regulatory process.

This dates back to 1921 when congress required that products that are sold to treat illness or disease be effective. The FDA is making rules to comply with the law by addressing the recent surge in false labeling.

This does add cost for companies that want to claim their product cures an ailment. The alternative is to allow false claims. There isn’t a good answer but the FDA and congress seem to be doing a decent job on this issue.

Individuals, however, can simply buy the vitamins and herbs without the claims and pay less in the process.


9 posted on 04/11/2007 9:00:17 AM PDT by gondramB (It wasn't raining when Noah built the ark.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
... really have nothing or near nothing that they advertise, in them ...

The marketplace is more than capable of putting unscrupulous vendors out of business.

10 posted on 04/11/2007 9:06:42 AM PDT by bimbo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
Might this also open up a path to insurance covering some of the holistic remedies?

That was always my problem when trying (years ago) to sell some of the MLM products.

11 posted on 04/11/2007 9:07:42 AM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv

Fer shure! The way the “Food Supplements” industry is right now, they have pretty much free reign to sell sawdust as a food supplement. I welcome a set of standards that they should all adhere to for quality and quantity and purity..................


12 posted on 04/11/2007 9:07:42 AM PDT by Red Badger (If it's consensus, it's not science. If it's science, there's no need for consensus......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

Believe me, I understand that.


13 posted on 04/11/2007 9:08:25 AM PDT by Gabz (I like mine with lettuce and tomato, heinz57 and french-fried potatoes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: bimbo

How do you know that they are unscrupulous if no one is testing their products? Right now, the way it is, anybody can set up a vitamin or mineral food supplement company and sell whatever they want with hardly any oversight. There’s one down the street from here where I work, that’s not much more than a warehouse.............


14 posted on 04/11/2007 9:10:12 AM PDT by Red Badger (If it's consensus, it's not science. If it's science, there's no need for consensus......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Gabz

“and that also goes for Kennedy and Waxman’s cockamammy idea of putting tobacco under FDA control.”

Big tobacco wouldn’t have any interest in FDA regulations being that they have already implemented warehouse to smoker Lot Tracking systems that cost millions which would run off the little guy and foreign competition, would they?


15 posted on 04/11/2007 9:15:45 AM PDT by Rb ver. 2.0 (A day in the country is better than a week in town.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bimbo

>>The marketplace is more than capable of putting unscrupulous vendors out of business.<<

Did you see the recent stories about vitamins without the advertised vitamins in them, vitamins that did not dissolve before they passed through the body and vitamins with excessive lead? There are big names in that story and the marketplace doesn’t seem to be taking care of it.

Truth in advertising is important and is properly regulated because selling something with false claims is a form of fraud which is correctly criminal.


16 posted on 04/11/2007 9:20:53 AM PDT by gondramB (It wasn't raining when Noah built the ark.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Rb ver. 2.0

Bingo!


17 posted on 04/11/2007 9:22:12 AM PDT by Gabz (I like mine with lettuce and tomato, heinz57 and french-fried potatoes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Halgr

I don’t understand how it’s constitutional that the FDA is an unelected body that can basically pass laws about medicine.


18 posted on 04/11/2007 9:22:23 AM PDT by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gondramB

But isn’t false advertising the perview of the FTC?


19 posted on 04/11/2007 9:23:01 AM PDT by Gabz (I like mine with lettuce and tomato, heinz57 and french-fried potatoes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: gondramB
You can sell vitamins and herbs - you can’t claim they cure cancer or impotence or anything else without proof and going through the regulatory process.

So something simple like Omega-3 fish oils will have to go through the approval process now? Or is that only if the seller claims they help boost HDL?

I can see a quality control issue being important, but how much speech will this inhibit if the FDA must approve any claim? Most supplements already say the claims are not endorsed by the FDA. Will that statement be insufficient?

20 posted on 04/11/2007 9:24:15 AM PDT by doc30 (Democrats are to morals what an Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson