Posted on 04/12/2007 6:28:00 AM PDT by veronica
Though Rudy has a larger lead Hillary’s race is declared to be “more settled” LoL.
“She will appeal directly to them via churches...” LoL no conservative will pay any attention to any “appeal” by Hillary about ANYTHING.
That has got to be one of the most absurd statements ever posted on FR.
You confuse mere destruction with winning. Among other things.
Yeah, why pay attention to polls when you can just dream up perfect and unbeatable candidates?
Too bad your “information” about the Unnamed Candidate is mainly BS.
Should we make decisions on caricatures now?
That statement from the article is deceptive and does not reflect a NY poll but the same national one described in the article.
But in any case, why should Rudy mess with the Senate when he can become president and accomplish FAR more?
LMAO! You Rudy Rooters are sounding more and more like the 'Rats every day.
The polls are early, way early, most people don’t know much about Rudy. He’s talked about confederate flags and milk prices, oh, and abortion, which he bombed on.
But we don’t need more right now, he has such a liberal history, it almost makes the present just smoke and mirrors.
When they do....Phfttttttttt...Bye Rudy. Bye Liberal Rudy
Yeah I know. ALL polls mean whatever the Rudy Rooters want them to mean.
But in any case, why should Rudy mess with the Senate when he can become president and accomplish FAR more?
It didn't seem to stop Hillary and it's never stopped others in the past.
-—Worry about your candidate and not about Rudy - Unless you really feel that threatened by him.-—
As of now I don’t have a candidate, which is sort of the problem.
But heh, I’m excited about the prospect of having two liberal parties not to vote for in 2008! Excited I tell you!
The opportunity to vote against my own gun rights, for government funded abortions, to piss on border control and welcome unlimited immigration (legal, schmegal!), and usher in gay marriage across the land is really just so exciting.
That is funny. Neither race anywhere near "settled". That's an amazing thing in and of it self. Hillary!'s should be more settled, she expected it to be, but it's just not. Especially not with Obambi's 100,000 donors.
What do RATs have to do with calling a fraudulent list fraudulent?
Suuure and we know your perfect candidate is going to come storming out of the dark to carry on to victory. It should be sooo easy but, unfortunately for you, Rudy’s lead has NOT dropped.
Rudy’s LEAD has not dropped since McCain has fallen even more and the other “major” candidate, Mitt, is going nowhere.
“Yeah I know. ALL polls mean whatever the Rudy Rooters want them to mean.” What a stupid comment. Even the Braindead should see that Rudy Rooters would WANT the poll to show him winning in NY. But that is NOT what the poll says despite the deceptive comment in the article. Ill speall it out for your “Matched head to head with a fellow NYer blah, blah, blah...”
And you add to your noted stupidity by making an irrelevant comment about Hillary. She had NO chance of running for the Presidency prior to the Senate seat. Had Rudy not been stricken with cancer her career would have been stopped cold in 2000.
It will in time, in fact, it already has. Its early yet.
I may not find a perfect candidate, whoever it is, it will not be a liberal, that would be Rudy, Hillary, Obama, Edwards etc.
I don’t settle for a liberal out of desperation.
Apparently you are as clueless as to what a “liberal” is as to everything else.
Alright, cut the personal insults. You may dislike me for my opinion, but like Rudy, if you don’t like it, you don’t have to vote for me.
What exactly is “fraudulent” about my list?
Are you denying that Rudy is pro-abortion (and keep in mind that EVERY pro-abortion candidate makes an “I’m personally opposed but it should be a woman’s choice” statement)?
Are you denying that Rudy has supported the militant homosexual agenda?
Are you denying that Rudy has gone out of his way to protect illegal immigration?
Are you denying that Rudy has curtailed gun ownership?
If you deny any of these things, provide links establishing the error.
New Time Poll:
Poll: Clinton, Giuliani Lead
Apr 12 02:36 PM US/Eastern
By The Associated Press
THE RACE: The presidential race for Republicans, Democrats nationally
THE NUMBERS - DEMOCRATS
Hillary Rodham Clinton 33 percent
Barack Obama 26 percent
John Edwards 25 percent
(These three were the only Democratic candidates listed in the Time poll question)
___
THE NUMBERS - REPUBLICANS
Rudy Giuliani 35 percent
John McCain 20 percent
Newt Gingrich 11 percent
Mitt Romney 10 percent
Fred Thompson 10 percent
(These five were the only GOP candidates listed in the Time poll question)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.