To: AndrewC; SunkenCiv; DaveLoneRanger
Sequenced? I don't think so.
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/data/316/5822/277/DC1/1
Wrong article. Try this.
39 posted on
04/13/2007 7:03:29 AM PDT by
ahayes
("Impenetrability! That's what I say!")
To: ahayes
He’s no doubt thinking of DNA sequencing, which this is not.
I recall a rather extended exchange with someone over the phrase “recessive genes” as applied to bacteria. It appears that terminology is not strict enough to avoid misunderstandings, when misunderstanding is the goal.
41 posted on
04/13/2007 8:46:54 AM PDT by
js1138
(The absolute seriousness of someone who is terminally deluded.)
43 posted on
04/13/2007 9:30:14 AM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(I last updated my profile on Monday, April 2, 2007. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson