Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Imus Dead [by William F. Buckley Jr.]
National Review ^ | April 14, 2007 | William F. Buckley

Posted on 04/14/2007 12:05:10 PM PDT by aculeus

Some years ago, Cokie Roberts, faithful to her profession and to the proposition that those engaged in public discourse, at whatever level, should be left free to do as they liked, stopped short. What did it was a speech at the Radio and Television Correspondents’ Association dinner, an annual affair at which, in 1996, 3,000 guests ate and drank in the company of President and Mrs. Clinton and listened to Don Imus. After that night’s performance, Ms. Roberts changed her mind. “I really don’t think it would be appropriate for any of us to ever go back on [Imus’s show],” she said. Imus’s monologue “was profoundly rude not only to the President of the United States and the First Lady, but also to our colleagues.” Two days later we learned from Mike McCurry, the president’s press secretary, that National Public Radio’s Elizabeth Arnold, who sat between him and the First Lady on the dais, was trying to incite a mass walkout. In retrospect, McCurry wished he had backed her up instead of sitting there for 25 agonizing minutes. “I was getting prepared to send a note down the table saying, ‘Let’s go,’ when mercifully [the speech] came to an end,” McCurry later said. “I think we would have gotten a standing ovation if we’d done it.”

Well, eleven years later “it” was done to Don Imus, and the sense is of the restoration of clean air. Not universally — nothing like that. The world of hip-hop, one learns, is untouchable. The language there is heavily coarse, profane, and perverted. It is ironic that although hip-hop is disproportionately black, it was an anti-black crack that finally undid Don Imus.

(Excerpt) Read more at article.nationalreview.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial
KEYWORDS: dnctalkingpoints; donimus; imus; macacamoment; mediabias
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-125 next last
To: Vn_survivor_67-68
Ah, here we go. Good evening Mr. President, Mrs.Clinton, honored guests, ladies and gentlemen, radio and TV scum.

You know I think it would be fair to say, back when the Clintons first took office, if we had placed them all in a lineup -- well, not a lineup -- if we were to have speculated about which member of the First Family would be the first to be indicted... I don't mean indicted -- I meant to receive a subpoena -- everybody would have picked Roger. I mean, been there done that.

Well, in the past 3 years, Socks the cat has been in more jams than Roger. Roger has been a saint. The cat has peed on national treasures. Roger hasn't. Socks has thrown up hairballs. Roger hasn't. Socks got his girlfriend pregnant and hasn't... oh no, that was Roger. And as you know, nearly every incident in the lives of the first family has been made worse by each and every person in this room of radio and television correspondents -- even innocuous incidents.

For example, when Cal Ripkin broke Lou Gherig's consecutive game record, the President was at Camden Yards doin' play by play in the radio with John Miller. Bobby Bonilla hit a double, we all heard the President in his obvious excitement holler "Go Baby!" I remember commenting at the time, I bet that's not the first time he's said that. Remember the Astroturf in the pickup? And my point is, there is an innocent event, made sinister by some creep in the media.

I'd forgotten how funny that was. Okay, it was rude and wrong to question the virtue of a girls' college basketball team. If he'd been a good academic, he would have referred to them as "sex workers," and no liberals would have objected. (Since when has chastity been a virtue to liberals? But that's not the girls' fault.)

But Imus did a lot of good stuff—and puffed up a lot of liberal scum. This correspondents' dinner thing is priceless.

21 posted on 04/14/2007 12:43:07 PM PDT by SamuraiScot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
Sorry William.Imus has a fowl mouth, but in all he is a decent man. Imus's philanthropy bears witness to this fact. You cannot impugn the decency of Imus.

Imus is hardly dead. He will rise again, phoenix like, from the ashes of the fire invoked by the pious, such as yourself William.

22 posted on 04/14/2007 12:47:19 PM PDT by Candor7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
"But anything — anything — will bring laughter to a crowd far gone in booze and impiety."

He may have a point. But the Clintonistas helped deliver the crudity and vulgarity that coarsened American culture in the 1990s.

23 posted on 04/14/2007 12:48:41 PM PDT by HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wormwood

If this tiresome incident actually led to something, like standards of decent speech, it would almost be worth having to listen to all the nauseating blather about to fire or not to fire . . .


24 posted on 04/14/2007 12:50:54 PM PDT by Liberty Wins (Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of all who threaten these.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Vn_survivor_67-68
Just a case of "speaking truth to power", supposedly a highly valued Liberal virtue.

Of course over here at the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy we've always known that claim to be total BS., and here's Cokey Roberts and McCurry proving out our belief.

You'd think these people would be able to get around to apologizing to the rest of us for trying to "live their lie" all this time, but alas, they are made of the same scum out of which Imus oozed.

25 posted on 04/14/2007 12:50:57 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Wormwood
>I get the distinct impression that William Buckley thinks this was long overdue
>> And once again, I find myself in complete agreement with him

I like Buckley, but
it's intriguing that Buckley
kind of pioneered

Springer/Geraldo
style shock television with
his famous meetings

with Gore Vidal that
almost ended as boxing
on television

and did include both
"Nazi" and "queer" getting thrown
around on the air.

Both Buckley and Gore
of course freaked out with more style
than today's clowns do . . .

26 posted on 04/14/2007 12:51:35 PM PDT by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

Who coarsened and vulgarized American culture more - Don Imus or Bill Clinton?


27 posted on 04/14/2007 12:52:31 PM PDT by HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
the person responsible for sticking the knife into Imus, to get him conveniently out of the way of her forthcoming campaign, was none other than the Hildabeast.

Hmm. That makes sense. Imus has been running hot and cold profanity for years on the radio. Why can him now? As the saying goes, the timing is suspicious.

28 posted on 04/14/2007 1:02:37 PM PDT by 6SJ7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Firefigher NC
Apparently it wasn't Imus who started the ho comment, nor the Jigaboo comment.

What about the sidekick McGuirk that actually started all this? -

According to MediaMatters.com, which posted a transcript and a video on its site, the "Imus in the Morning" conversation went this way:

IMUS: So, I watched the basketball game last night between -- a little bit of Rutgers and Tennessee, the women's final.

ROSENBERG: Yeah, Tennessee won last night -- seventh championship for [Tennessee coach] Pat Summitt, I-Man. They beat Rutgers by 13 points.

IMUS: That's some rough girls from Rutgers. Man, they got tattoos and --

McGUIRK: Some hard-core hos.

IMUS: That's some nappy-headed hos there. I'm gonna tell you that now, man, that's some -- woo. And the girls from Tennessee, they all look cute, you know, so, like -- kinda like -- I don't know.

McGUIRK: A Spike Lee thing.

IMUS: Yeah.

McGUIRK: The Jigaboos vs. the Wannabes -- that movie that he had.

IMUS: Yeah, it was a tough --

McCORD: "Do The Right Thing."

McGUIRK: Yeah, yeah, yeah.

IMUS: I don't know if I'd have wanted to beat Rutgers or not, but they did, right?

ROSENBERG: It was a tough watch. The more I look at Rutgers, they look exactly like the Toronto Raptors.

IMUS: Well, I guess, yeah.

RUFFINO: Only tougher.

McGUIRK: The [Memphis] Grizzlies would be more appropriate.

Imus apologized on his show Friday morning, which is broadcast simultaneously on WFAN-AM and MSNBC, saying his remarks were “insensitive and ill-conceived.” Imus’ critics, however, said his contrition is too little, too late.

29 posted on 04/14/2007 1:09:23 PM PDT by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

Yes, I can’t say I like Imus but if his ‘targe’ had been Bush these same people would have him up for some journalism reward.


30 posted on 04/14/2007 1:12:49 PM PDT by hardworking (What's the big deal with same sex marriage? The Clintons have been in one for years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

she said. Imus’s monologue “was profoundly rude not only to the President of the United States and the First Lady,.....

Bingo....there is the answer


31 posted on 04/14/2007 1:13:45 PM PDT by thinking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: theFIRMbss
Firm,

You stole my thunder.

If Buckley did the Vidal debate today and his foil was either Bill Maher, Rosie O'Donnell or the Reverend Al or Jesse, the outcome would be much different than in the 60's.

For better or for worse, Imus got away with a lot more when he had his two funny men/writers always on the show (Rob Bartlet was one). Totally un-PC, but they were funny at times. Without them he came across and an angry ole' coot.

32 posted on 04/14/2007 1:19:40 PM PDT by taildragger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
Doing roasts can be walking a thin line. "Good natured joshing" and gratuitous nastiness can be hard to separate. It might be fun and informative if somebody tried doing some of Imus's Clinton jokes at the next celebrity roast, only changing the names, to see what kind of a reaction they got.

Actually, a lot of the speech is made up of barbs against the press (and against Clinton's opponents), rather than against Clinton, and those jabs at anchormen and reporters may account for the reaction against him at the time. Whatever the Clintons' thought, you can bet Rather, Jennings, and Brokaw didn't want to hear from him again.

33 posted on 04/14/2007 1:32:05 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taildragger
Buckley might argue, with casuitical distinction, that dropping the Q-bomb on Vidal, author of a pornographic novel, was merely a statement of fact and not in the same category as Ann Coulter's or Don Imus's recent PC speech violations. Maybe he will clarify?

The Imus comments at the '96 Correspondents Dinner were rather tame in terms of anti-Clinton humor in the 1990s. Anyone remember the SNL TV FUNHOUSE parody of Clinton's testimony in the Starr investigation? ( TV FUNHOUSE Clinton )

The argument to be made against the coarsening of American culture in the media would have to cast a wide net and include the Clintons, network television, Hollywood, liberals, etc. Imus may be the focus now but the vulgarization continues. Were any prominent liberals on center stage complaining about the perverted and degrading "ho" misogyny in lyrics before the Imus incident? What about the skanky porn high school kids now upload on to their websites? There is a lot more to this issue than Don Imus.

34 posted on 04/14/2007 1:54:34 PM PDT by HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

Well, that’s the old conservative party dinosaur writing. Don Imus was one of the few voices in radio who would strip the bark off any public official regardless of race, creed, sexual orientation, party or otherwise. And he did with a biting sarcasm that made people laugh. He’ll be back, because we still want that.


35 posted on 04/14/2007 1:57:04 PM PDT by gotribe ( I can find no warrant for such an appropriation in the Constitution... - Grover Cleveland.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
anti-black crack

Now that's series.

36 posted on 04/14/2007 1:59:12 PM PDT by M. Thatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
>Were any prominent liberals on center stage complaining about the perverted and degrading "ho" misogyny in lyrics before the Imus incident? What about the skanky porn high school kids now upload on to their websites? There is a lot more to this issue than Don Imus.

My suspicion is
among many liberals
there is racism

that is uglier
than Imus, but unspoken.
I think liberals

accept that white folks
have to speak right because whites
can understand "right"

but liberals think
whites have to put up with blacks
and "their" hip-hop crap

because "They're blacks and
black people must be held to
lower standards than

white people." No one
would say that but that appears
to be their thinking.

37 posted on 04/14/2007 2:06:08 PM PDT by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Firefigher NC

Those words were from a Spike Lee movie!! That’s why you didn’t hear anything about them.


38 posted on 04/14/2007 2:07:02 PM PDT by Suzy Quzy (Hillary '08...Her Phoniness is Genuine!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Vn_survivor_67-68

While I agree with Buckley that Imus got what he deserved, that screed in front of Hitlery for the White House Correspondents’ Dinner was just a bit of pay-back for the role Imus played in playing footsie with Clinton after the 1992 60 Minutes Appearance. That interview on the Imus show probably helped Clinton win the NY Primary and then the presidency. Imus helped Bubba as much as any media figure that year — it’s about time he paid the piper.


39 posted on 04/14/2007 2:11:35 PM PDT by ReleaseTheHounds ("Salvation is not free")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

which is more EVIL?

1. foul speech protected under the 1st amendment of the u.s. constitution.

or

2. pc of the universities that harkens back to nazi germany and the soviet union.


40 posted on 04/14/2007 2:14:06 PM PDT by ken21 (it takes a village to brainwash your child + to steal your property! /s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-125 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson