Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dog Gone
I haven’t decided whom to support, but if this forum doesn’t quit jumping around from candidate to candidate in search of the anti-Rudy, it’s going to face some problems.

And will you cut it out with this nonsense? You people are always the ones who are telling us to push electable Republicans. Hunter is sadly not electable. But now you're complaining that we have found someone who is electable and palatable. What in the hell is so bad about this?!?

226 posted on 04/20/2007 1:15:18 AM PDT by jmc813 (The 2nd Amendment is NOT a "social conservative" issue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies ]


To: jmc813
And will you cut it out with this nonsense? You people are always the ones who are telling us to push electable Republicans. Hunter is sadly not electable. But now you're complaining that we have found someone who is electable and palatable.

Who put Tabasco in your jock strap? My point is that if this forum can't rally around the eventual Republican nominee, it will be in trouble. What is nonsensical about that?

As of today, this forum is in fairly broad agreement that Fred Thompson would make a good nominee. Trouble is, he isn't running, at least not yet. And if he does run, he might not win the nomination. And then, what will you do?

If this forum is hostile to the supporters of the nominee, if that doesn't happen to be Fred Thompson, how supportive will they be of this forum and how comfortable will they be in posting at all?

Those are fair questions, and just because they make you uncomfortable is not a reason for me not to ask them.

230 posted on 04/20/2007 11:06:27 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson