Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kinoxi

there really isn’t much here to get to upset about - these “rights” like hospital visitation, organ donation - who really cares if these people want to willfully agree to these between themselves.


10 posted on 04/21/2007 1:34:48 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: oceanview
THose are rights they already have. They don’t need domestic partnership in order to do any of those things. Also, they can still BOTH get Social Security, which is why they threw in seniors, so it doesn’t look discriminatory. However, married couples do not have the same benefit.
15 posted on 04/21/2007 1:57:42 PM PDT by gidget7 (2Th 2:11 And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: oceanview
there really isn’t much here to get to upset about

I have a sneaking suspicion from the wording in the article that the list is not exhaustive:

provides enhanced rights for same-sex couples, including hospital visitation rights, the ability to authorize autopsies and organ donations and inheritance rights when there is no will.

It's probable that the article left out the more pernicious requirements that reasonable Washington society must now follow.

22 posted on 04/21/2007 8:45:43 PM PDT by fwdude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson