I think they are all conservatives. I concede that Rudy is a "liberal," but I think the Rudy folks that were on FR were conservatives, I believe they proved it over time. I won't agree that they should not argue strenuously and freeper-like (which can be kind of tough) on behalf of their candidate, since he is the leading contender for the conservative party in America, the GOP, if that's what is meant by being divisive. I will agree that the onus is on them to prove that Rudy is a conservative.
“I concede that Rudy is a “liberal,”
That’s a good place to call it a night lol...
“but I think the Rudy folks that were on FR were conservatives, I believe they proved it over time. I won’t agree that they should not argue strenuously and freeper-like”
I can’t agree. They constantly abused anybody who dared to question Pres. Bush on policies where he left conservatives in the lerch (Miers,CFR,borders,spending)...They were being good Repubs, not conservatives. Now above you talk about their right to argue strenuously for their candidate (Giuliani)...yet you claimed the onus was on them to argue Giulianis conservatism. But they really havent outside of WOT, some questionable tax/spend policies. What they did to push the owner over the top is to start denigrating conservative candidates and RWR so as to somehow, tactically make Giuliani look better...that was the line he drew over and over, even to individual posters. Yet they still insisted on doing it right in his face, even after he warned them.