Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mazi83

So I guess by her standards, a requirement to be on the SCOTUS is that you have to be an athiest?

Ridiculous


17 posted on 04/21/2007 7:30:52 PM PDT by peteram
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: peteram
So I guess by her standards, a requirement to be on the SCOTUS is that you have to be an athiest?

I know some Liberals who (completely seriously) say that the First Amendment declares "Separation of Church and State" (it doesn't) and that what this really means is that church-going people are supposed to be banned from politics. If an avowed Christian holds an elective office (or is appointed to SCOTUS) then we are just a Theocracy like Iran.

I'm in MA where most people are barking moonbats.

30 posted on 04/21/2007 7:42:09 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Enoch Powell was right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: peteram
So I guess by her standards, a requirement to be on the SCOTUS is that you have to be an athiest?

Isn't Atheism a religion of its own, as is Human Secularism?

Does Rosie O'Bigmouth propose justices that believe or think nothing?

What really disturbs her immenseness is not that they are Catholic, so much, but that they are conservative who issued a ruling she doesn't like.

43 posted on 04/21/2007 7:59:38 PM PDT by DakotaRed (Liberals don't rattle sabers, they wave white flags)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson