Saddam WMD: Findings and Analysis Based on Captured Iraqi Documents (Part I)

April 23 2007 | jveritas

[jveritas]

As promised.

[BenLurkin]

bttt

[jveritas]

It has been a while :). If you still have the Prewar docs pingees list, can you please ping them for this thread. As always thank you very much for all your help.

[MizSterious]

Mark to read later...thanks, jveritas.

[Chena]

Thank you, jveritas. BTTT and bookmarking. :)

[CedarDave]

The documents mention by name the few towns and one district in the Anbar province where Saddam regime wanted the Chemical materials burial sites. Because these towns are located in the Anbar province the heart of the terrorist insurgency in Iraq I will not mention these documents in a public forum for security concerns.

A wise move. And this is a possible reason for the Bush administration to keep their knowledge of these chemicals from the public. Maybe no WMD's per se, but precursers that could quickly be made into chemical weapons. One of these days we need the whole story out there, AFTER the chemicals are found and removed.

Once again outstanding work!

[Lee'sGhost]

Have to disagree with the idea that the WMDs weren’t shipped out of country. Bush declaring WMDs did not exist makes no sense in the absence of it being to protect Russian culpability.

By the way, what is the status of the documents? Are they back on line?

[TigersEye]

Great work. bttt

[jveritas]

The liberals and their media have been spreading the lie of no WMD found where in reality so far we did not find stockpiles of Chemical Weapons in its final product from. That is the mistake the Iraq Survey Group (ISG) made when they worked and focused on finding the “stockpiles of Chemical Weapons” rather than focus on the Precursors to make Chemical weapons. For the reason I explained above, I think it was much better and more efficient for Saddam to work on all the Precursors i.e. ingredients required to make Chemical Weapons and store it so they can very quickly produce the final Chemical Weapon when it is required. The estimation that some of these weapons can be produced in one week once the precursors to make it are available.

[jveritas]

By the way, what is the status of the documents? Are they back on line?

Not yet, unfortunately the website is still shut down.

[r-q-tek86]

Thank you, jveritas, for all your hard work

[iopscusa]

Thanks Jveritas, you do good work!

[Lee'sGhost]

Thanks! What about my other point? I like your analysis but I have problems with that one point. Was hoping you might have more insight as to why Bush denies WMD. A subject that drives me nuts.

[bassmaner]

bump, and I have the same question as L’s G ...

[azhenfud]

bump

[pissant]

bookmark

[Matthew James]

bttt

[april15Bendovr]

Thank you Jveritas for making the truth clear especially for those that seem to be hiding from it.

Winston Churchill said it best

“The truth is incontrovertible, malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end; there it is.”

[ikez78]

Excellent Joseph.