1 posted on
04/23/2007 9:24:43 PM PDT by
blam
To: blam
What we worked out sixty years ago stymies some here and now. The mind reels.
2 posted on
04/23/2007 9:27:15 PM PDT by
dighton
To: blam
is that over under
wonder if vegas has pool going
this could be fun
i say they have them, but they did not unpack them yet from the original packaging
3 posted on
04/23/2007 9:28:32 PM PDT by
Flavius
("Qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum")
To: blam
Depending on whom you listen to
Iran is two months, six months, three years
whatever; a preemptive stick is in order. Then the question disappears.
4 posted on
04/23/2007 9:28:52 PM PDT by
doc1019
(Fred Thompson '08)
To: blam
Is this solely a technical problem for high grade enrichment or low grade enrichment for the power plant?
5 posted on
04/23/2007 9:35:47 PM PDT by
headstamp
(Nothing lasts forever, Unless it does.)
To: blam
A sign written in English? yeh, right.
7 posted on
04/23/2007 9:50:48 PM PDT by
Not now, Not ever!
(The devil made me do it!,.......................................................( well, not really.)
To: blam
It took less than four years from the beginning of the Manhattan Project to the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Since Iran already is well on its way to developing the bomb and so much of the nuclear physics which the Manhattan Project had to discover is now readily available, anyone who comes up with a four year estimate for any halfway industrialized country with cash to develop a nuclear bomb is a liar, a fool or both.
8 posted on
04/23/2007 9:58:55 PM PDT by
KarlInOhio
(Parker v. DC: the best court decision of the year.)
To: blam
All of this activity emanating from the Iranian nuclear program is a lot of smoke-and-mirrors misdirection, in my view. It simply doesn’t matter if the Iranians can make enough (or any) weapons-grade U-235. It only matters if the world believes they can, hence this great Iranian show of fierce scientific effort to build the bomb. I’m guessing the mullahs will wait for a believable amount of time—a year from now, say, or eighteen months or so—and then surprise the world with a highly visible and widely reported atomic bomb test much earlier than anticipated or projected by the intelligence sources identified in the article. No one could prove provenance after the fact, one way or the other, but the device will almost certainly be old Soviet or North Korean. I’m betting North Korean. Putin may not shrink from the prospect of a new Cold War, but I doubt very much he would risk a hot one.
To: blam
An Iranian arsenal of nuclear weapons is not the current threat to our troops in Iraq and Afghanistan. Iranian trained & armed jihadist infiltrators are murdering our troops, plus the mass slaughter of thousands of Iraqi civilians. That is more then enough reason Tehran’s top Shi’ite-nazis must be disposed of quickly.
10 posted on
04/24/2007 12:44:35 AM PDT by
M. Espinola
(Freedom is never free)
To: blam
11 posted on
04/24/2007 12:45:56 AM PDT by
stephenjohnbanker
( Hunter/Thompson/Thompson/Hunter in 08! Or Rudy/Hillary if you want to murder conservatism)
To: blam
Don't believe it.
AQ according to their "Seven Steps to..." plans a 2010 hit. Iran will be ready to collaborate with them by then. Two years and they'll have a functional device. One year to smuggle it in.
12 posted on
04/24/2007 5:54:18 AM PDT by
rjp2005
(Lord have mercy on us)
To: blam
Iran Four Years From Atomic Bomb, Say Experts That's what the "experts" said 4 years ago. In all probability, they have several now. Does anyone really believe that Paki-Stan's Mullah mafia hasn't sold any to their Iranian "brothers in Jihad, all the world is for Allah" fundamentalist nutjobs?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson