Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Saddam Regime Document Dated May 1999 Reveals Plans for Terrorist Attacks in Europe (Translation).
Docex/FMSO/Pentagon Iraqi documents Website | April 24 2007 | jveritas

Posted on 04/24/2007 7:11:23 AM PDT by jveritas

Some of you may have read an article by Stephan Hayes of the Weekly Standard where he wrote about terrorist operations planed by Saddam regime in May 1999 to be conducted in Europe and elsewhere. The code name of the terrorist operations was called “Blessed July”. The operations were planned by Uday Saddam Hussein who was in charge of Saddam Feedeyeens and they called him as well the Supervisor or the Commander as you will read in the translation below. This Iraqi document ISGZ-2004-01894 is yet another powerful proof that Saddam regime was heavily involved with terrorism and President Bush made the absolute right decision to remove such a terrorist regime from power after 9/11. And this document is yet another proof to show liberals and their media that they are simply lying when they say that Saddam regime has no connections to terrorism, it was not just connections but the regime by itself was a “Terrorist Regime”.

The translation below was made by the Pentagon translator(s) and the translated document was posted on the FMSO Iraqi documents website before it was unfortunately shut down on November 2nd 2006. Fortunately I was able to download it and save it before the website shut down

Beginning of the Translation

Page 1

In the Name of God the Most Merciful, the Most Compassionate

Respectful Mr. In Charge of Feedyeen Saddam

My respect and regards Sir.

Referral to your Excellency’s orders on the days of 20-25/05/1999 to start planning from on to perform special operations (assassinations/bombings) for the centers and the traitor symbols in the fields of (London/Iran/Self ruled areas) and for coordination with the Intelligence service to secure deliveries, accommodations, and target guidance. Also, I would like to indicate here (according to the first directed operation plan) the explanations of all the orders and directives that have been issued to us by you during the first and the second meetings with your Excellency which lay the ground works toward our achieving the goal.

1. Code of the special operations (Blessed July)

2. The duties will be divided into two branches which are:

A- Bombings

B-Assassinations

Page 2

9- The study (execution plan) submitted to the respectful Mr. Commander to determine the final comments.

10. Reforming the paln after noticing any revisions or additions that need to be re-written.

11. The final plans, with timing, and the necessary fundamentals for execution, should be written in two copies. Once copy for the higher authorities and the other copy to be kept with the working team until the order are issued.

12. General subjects

A – The ex-order in the Jordanian field is cancelled.

B- The traitors must followed (movements, residences, activities) at all fields at this time.

C-Discussion of the work possibilities at the Lebanese field.

D- Reminders of the usage of the death capsules (Penephedine) when members are captured at the European filed. E- Any limitation that will arise… (Translator note: incomplete)

Page 3

5- Execution steps.

A- Select (50 fedayeen martyrs according to required specifications.

B- Admit them in a seminar at the Intelligence School to prepare them for the required duties.

C- After passing the tests they will be selected for the target as follow:

First: The first ten will work in the European field (London)

Second: The second ten will be working in the Iranian field.

Third: The third ten will be working in the Self ruled area.

D- After passing the final test the fedayeens will sent as undercover passengers, each one according to his work site, for the purpose of preparations and to acquire and coordinate with the Intelligence Apparatus and Mr. ‘Aiath.

6. After completion of what is indicate in (5) above the major and general steps should be prepared for execution and are to be supervised by the respectful Mr. Supervisor and to determine his remarks.

7. Revisions of the plan, according to the (Supervisor) remarks, coordination, and description of the plans will be presented to the Intelligence Apparatus as follows.

End of Pentagon Translation.


TOPICS: Breaking News; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 199905; blessedjuly; europeanterrorism; fmso; gwot; iraq; iraqwar; jveritas; prewardocs; saddamhussein; whywefight; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-153 next last

1 posted on 04/24/2007 7:11:25 AM PDT by jveritas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jveritas

bttt

Thank God President Bush removed this regime from the face of the earth. I don’t even want to imagine what would have happened if Saddam remained in Power ‘til death, and were to be followed by Uday or Qusai, who were either certifiable lunatics, psychopaths or madmen.


2 posted on 04/24/2007 7:16:10 AM PDT by SolidWood (Islam is an insanity cult that makes everyone act Arab)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: april15Bendovr; ikez78; eyespysomething

Ping.


3 posted on 04/24/2007 7:16:26 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SolidWood

Exactly, Saddam Sons would have made the world a much darker place if they would have stayed in power.


4 posted on 04/24/2007 7:17:37 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
Thank you for all your work, jveritas!

And here's a link to the Weekly Standard piece for anyone who missed it...

"Blessed July" One of the Saddam documents details orders for an extensive terrorist operation.

5 posted on 04/24/2007 7:18:24 AM PDT by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Thanks for continuing to bring us these documents jveritas. Keep up the good work.


6 posted on 04/24/2007 7:19:31 AM PDT by Spunky ("Everyone has a freedom of choice, but not of consequences.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Marking for later with continuing thanks, jveritas...


7 posted on 04/24/2007 7:21:02 AM PDT by eureka! (The 'rats have made their choice in the WOT and honest history will not be kind...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Thank you for your work. Someday the truth will get out. Let us hope it is not too late.


8 posted on 04/24/2007 7:21:35 AM PDT by Freee-dame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

“The translation below was made by the Pentagon translator(s) and the translated document was posted on the FMSO Iraqi documents website before it was unfortunately shut down on November 2nd 2006. Fortunately I was able to download it and save it before the website shut down”

Surely most of those documents got downloaded and saved somewhere. Kind of a slick move on the part of the government, now they can say, “we shut it down” when it’s likely most of the docs are floating around the web somewhere.

That’s how you appease both sides.

That’s how you keep the peons occupied.


9 posted on 04/24/2007 7:25:16 AM PDT by dynoman (Objectivity is the essence of intelligence. - Marylin vos Savant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

So this information gets buried while the Democrats cluck endlessly about what a pointless war this was. Are there any remaining pro-war Republicans in Congress who would care to read this into the Congressional Record?


10 posted on 04/24/2007 7:30:39 AM PDT by popdonnelly (Our first responsibility is to keep the power of the Presidency out of the hands of the Clintons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla; Spunky; eureka!; cookcounty; Free Dane

Thank you all.


11 posted on 04/24/2007 7:32:07 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

thank you for your efforts.
Is anybody other than FR noticing your work ?


12 posted on 04/24/2007 7:37:03 AM PDT by stylin19a (Beer doesn't make you fat, it makes you lean.... Against bars, posts and tables.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Good work sir!

Will read in depth later.


13 posted on 04/24/2007 7:38:39 AM PDT by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

They shut down the web site? Why on earth would they do that?

I thought the initial documents were just the tip of the iceberg anyway?


14 posted on 04/24/2007 7:42:17 AM PDT by UKrepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
Thanks, J! People forget that the biggest pre-invasion threat posed by Iraq IMHO was a conventional attack aimed at the US or US interests.

As Saddam said throughout the 90s (and always ignored by MSM), "The Mother of All Battles is not over."
15 posted on 04/24/2007 7:52:02 AM PDT by Thrownatbirth (.....when the sidewalks are safe for the little guy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Good to see you translating again j.

But we all know Saddam had no ties to terrorism.

Nancy Pelosi said so.


16 posted on 04/24/2007 7:55:40 AM PDT by prairiebreeze (Too blessed to be stressed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a

Very few.


17 posted on 04/24/2007 7:56:58 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
This is axiomatically untrue because Saddam was "secular" and terrorists are "religious". Everyone knows that. Also, Saddam 'wouldn't want to' work with terrorists, so even if there is evidence that he did, we can discount it because he 'wouldn't want to'. Further, Saddam was (at root) self-interested, and he knew that if he engaged in any terrorism he'd get in trouble, therefore he 'wouldn't want to' - so even if there is evidence that he wanted to, I still say he 'wouldn't want to'.

Finally, so what if Saddam planned a little bit of terrorism. Saddam was an Arab/Muslim. Are you a racist or something? Plus we probably did something to tick him off anyway. Or Europe did. Or whoever he was planning to target. He had a right to be ticked off at whatever it is that we/Europe did. Plus he's an Arab, so you expect him to engage in no terrorism whatsoever? So naive. You just don't know anything Arab culture, I guess. Ignorant boob. Learn something about the world next time before you comment.

/every_lefty_retort_boiled_down_to_its_essence

18 posted on 04/24/2007 8:06:20 AM PDT by Dr. Frank fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Ping-a-ling-a-ding-dong for later


19 posted on 04/24/2007 8:06:43 AM PDT by RedCell ("...thou shalt kill thine enemy before he killeth you by any means available" - Dick Marcinko)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Letter Exposes New Leader In Al Qa’ida High Command

Letter made available by the Combating Terrorism Center at West Point

http://209.85.165.104/search?q=cache:F3B1xhk75I8J:www.ctc.usma.edu/harmony/CTC-AtiyahLetter.pdf+Iraq+In+the+Name+of+God+the+Most+Merciful,+the+Most+Compassionate&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=5&gl=us


20 posted on 04/24/2007 8:08:38 AM PDT by april15Bendovr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #21 Removed by Moderator

To: jveritas

Saddam was a menace to us, his own population and to the Israelis. That enough was justification to get rid of the scumbag.


22 posted on 04/24/2007 8:12:06 AM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

bump


23 posted on 04/24/2007 8:27:02 AM PDT by lesser_satan (FRED THOMPSON '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rrc

IIRC, the dems (via the IAEA) were worried that the information on the site was a “threat” to U.S. security—funny how they never bother about that when they decide to leak other classified info to the NY Slimes.


24 posted on 04/24/2007 8:30:43 AM PDT by rightwingintelligentsia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

God bless for the great work you’ve done with these translations. It’s here for anyone to learn.


25 posted on 04/24/2007 8:40:28 AM PDT by Fudd Fan (The word "Conservative" needs no modifier!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Thank you yet again.


26 posted on 04/24/2007 8:44:25 AM PDT by cgk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UKrepublican

They shut the website after the New York Times wrote an article about a complaint form the IAEA who said that there was a sensitive document about Saddam nuclear program published on the website and it should not have been published. The document was part of the 1996 FFCD (Full Complete and Final Disclosure) presented to the UN and IAEA by Iraq and details their nuclear program activity as well as other WMD programs. Any nation who is a member of the IAEA could have accessed this 1996 document in one way or another and they do not need to wait for the Pentagon to publish such a document 10 years after the fact.


27 posted on 04/24/2007 8:46:38 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Frank fan

Yep, we can always precidt the left wing lunatics will say.


28 posted on 04/24/2007 8:49:56 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Absolutely.


29 posted on 04/24/2007 8:50:55 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Frank fan

very witty.


30 posted on 04/24/2007 8:51:27 AM PDT by GodfearingTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Fudd Fan; cgk

Just doing my little duty.


31 posted on 04/24/2007 8:51:49 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: SolidWood
“Thank God President Bush removed this regime from the face of the earth. I don’t even want to imagine what would have happened if Saddam remained in Power ‘til death, and were to be followed by Uday or Qusai, who were either certifiable lunatics, psychopaths or madmen.”

Thats a good example of the difference between being a proactive fighter compared to the spineless politically correct rules of engagement extremist liberals. If President Bush caved to political pressure the results would of been catastrophic.

If this attack were to happen as a result of our political inaction liberals still never would of accepted responsiblity.

Dennis Miller said it best "Liberals always feel your pain. Unless of course, they caused it."

32 posted on 04/24/2007 9:06:23 AM PDT by april15Bendovr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

And doing it damn fine, too!


33 posted on 04/24/2007 9:06:48 AM PDT by RaceBannon (Innocent until proven guilty: The Pendleton 8...down to 3..GWB, we hardly knew ye...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: UKrepublican

The Demagogues, the IAEA, and the NY Times worked in concert to create a little furor about a doc with nuclear related info that the IAEA suddenly claimed could help countries like Iran..... funny how no one in the servile leftist media seemed to notice that these clowns claim simultaneously that (1) Saddam’s regime was no threat at all, and (2) just ONE doc from the millions in the archives could be of value to the nuclear weapons programs of rogue states like Iran.

On the one hand, we are not supposed to pay attention to these docs because there’s nothing there (sic)...... OTOH, the website for the docs had to be shut down because of the grave sensitivity of these docs........ these ass-clowns can’t even keep their own propaganda story straight!


34 posted on 04/24/2007 9:08:40 AM PDT by Enchante (Liefong, Fitzfong, Earlefong, Schumfong, Waxfong, Pelosifong.... see a pattern here?!?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Thanks for the ping, thanks for the eye-opening work!


35 posted on 04/24/2007 9:23:57 AM PDT by T'wit (Visitors: you come here expecting a turkey shoot, and then you find out that you are the turkey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

JV: you’re awesome!


36 posted on 04/24/2007 9:29:55 AM PDT by AFPhys ((.Praying for President Bush, our troops, their families, and all my American neighbors..))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

jveritas,
two out in one day...PING
You do a service to your Nation.

Irish Mike


37 posted on 04/24/2007 9:32:24 AM PDT by IrishMike ( What happens when aliens breed with sheep ? - Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Wait a minute...there were no links between Saddam and terrorists, right???

Nothing to see here...move along...pay no attention to the man behind the curtain...


38 posted on 04/24/2007 9:34:05 AM PDT by TampaDude (If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the PROBLEM!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
Always curious why these terrorist documents start off with “In the Name of God the Most Merciful, the Most Compassionate?”

They might as well say “Attention we have hijacked the Islamic religion”

Don't they realize that this type of statement is going to make it harder winning over the hearts and minds of our enabling liberals that only believe in their agenda not God?

I guess it doesn't matter anyway because it appears they already have an unholy alliance as David Horowitz has suggested.

39 posted on 04/24/2007 9:49:34 AM PDT by april15Bendovr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: april15Bendovr

It especially shows Saddam’s regime was far from being secular...

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1822644/posts


40 posted on 04/24/2007 9:59:13 AM PDT by drzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Thank you, again.


41 posted on 04/24/2007 9:59:24 AM PDT by SouthTexas (Man made global warming is a man made LIE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Oh I do remember. Thanks.


42 posted on 04/24/2007 10:00:06 AM PDT by UKrepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

I have one question about the translation:

Does the original begin, “In the name of God,” or does it say, “In the name of Allah?”

Because you can’t convince me the two are the same.

Allah = Satan, maybe.


43 posted on 04/24/2007 10:00:28 AM PDT by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

See page 71 on the web (53 on paper)

Fedayeens terrorist operations against the West

http://www.foreignaffairs.org/special/iraq/ipp.pdf


44 posted on 04/24/2007 10:02:39 AM PDT by drzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: april15Bendovr

Not only that but also there are a lot of Saddam regime documents that add additional Koranic verses to their letter header. Saddam the secular? Only in left wing lunatic liberal minds.


45 posted on 04/24/2007 10:13:20 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Redbob

The original begins “In the name of Allah”. I agree with you that if we have to look at it from religious perspective their Allah is not our GOD. However the Arab Christians long before islam used the name Allah for GOD and it was derived from the Hebrew Allohim. The muslims adopted the same name “Allah” but the way they view Allah is a lot different from the way we view GOD.


46 posted on 04/24/2007 10:17:15 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia

Excellent point.


47 posted on 04/24/2007 10:18:26 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Wow.


48 posted on 04/24/2007 10:19:50 AM PDT by b4its2late (Liberalism is a mental disorder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thrownatbirth

That is exactly correct. In many documents that I have read Saddam considered that the Mothers all Battles is not over yet.


49 posted on 04/24/2007 10:20:44 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

Thank you very much for the link. The Weekly Standard (Hayes and others) did a great job in showing Saddam regime strong connections to terrorism.


50 posted on 04/24/2007 10:22:11 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-153 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson