Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge: No religion at post office
AP on Yahoo ^ | 4/24/07 | Dave Collins - ap

Posted on 04/24/2007 8:59:32 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

HARTFORD, Conn. - Religion has no place in post offices run by churches and other private contractors, a federal judge has ruled, citing the constitutional separation of church and state.

U.S. District Judge Dominic J. Squatrito, in a case involving a church-run post office in Manchester, ordered the Postal Service to notify the nearly 5,200 facilities run by contractors that they cannot promote religion through pamphlets, displays or any other materials.

He also told the agency to monitor those offices, which are distinguishable from government-run facilities and employ workers who are not Postal Service employees, to make sure they comply with his ruling.

Postal officials said they could not immediately comment on the ruling, which is dated April 18.

"We're carefully reviewing the decision and considering our options, including an appeal," said Gerry McKiernan, a Postal Service spokesman at the agency's headquarters in Washington, D.C.

Squatrito sided with Bertram Cooper, who in 2003 sued the Postal Service and the Full Gospel Interdenominational Church, which operates the Sincerely Yours Inc. post office on Main Street in downtown Manchester.

When he filed the lawsuit, Cooper, a Navy veteran of World War II and the Korean War, said he became upset when he went to Sincerely Yours.

"I'm walking into a place that's doing government business — selling stamps, mailing parcels and so forth — and they're doing this religious bit," Cooper, who is Jewish, said in 2003. His phone number is not listed, and he could not be reached for comment Tuesday.

The Manchester office has a label on an exterior wall with the Postal Service's eagle symbol indicating it is a contract postal unit, along with a Sincerely Yours sign over the threshold.

Inside, the facility has evangelical displays, including posters, advertisements and artwork. One of the displays is about Jesus Christ and invites customers to submit a request if they "need a prayer in their lives."

The office has prayer cards and an advertisement for a mission run by the Full Gospel Interdenominational Church that receives profits from the post office. There is a television monitor for church-related religious videos.

There is also a sign saying the Postal Service does not endorse the religious viewpoints expressed in the materials in the office.

A worker at the office referred questions to church officials, who did not return a message seeking comment Tuesday.

"There is nothing wrong, per se, with the church exhibiting religious displays," Squatrito wrote in his ruling. "Here, however, the church is exhibiting such displays while it is performing its duties under a contract with the Postal Service., i.e. the U.S. Government."

Squatrito said that the post office was a state "actor" under the First Amendment and that its religious displays violate the clause calling for the separation of church and state. But he said the contract itself does not violate the clause.

Manchester Postmaster Ronald Boyne, who also was a defendant, declined to comment.

The Postal Service had argued that signs make it clear that Sincerely Yours is not an "official" postal facility. It also said that it had no proprietary interest in the office, other than postal products and equipment, and that there was no evidence that the agency had a direct financial stake in the office's success.

The agency noted that no government employees work at Sincerely Yours, and insisted the facts demonstrate that the post office is a private entity.

The judge said the Postal Service relies on contractor-run offices to provide services to areas that the agency has determined to be unsuitable for official facilities. Contract offices are typically at colleges, grocery stores, pharmacies and some private residences.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Connecticut
KEYWORDS: activistcourts; churchandstate; jewbastard; judge; judicialactivism; judicialtyranny; postoffice; religion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 04/24/2007 8:59:34 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

“Separation of Church and State”. No. This is judicial fiat banishing religion from the public sphere, which is itslf a direct violation of the Constitution.


2 posted on 04/24/2007 9:07:19 PM PDT by pierrem15 (Charles Martel: past and future of France)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Fulbright scholar, Clinton appointee 1994

http://www.fjc.gov/history/home.nsf/judges_frm

Squatrito, Dominic J.
Born 1939 in Hartford, CT

Federal Judicial Service:
Judge, U. S. District Court, District of Connecticut
Nominated by William J. Clinton on July 28, 1994, to a new seat created by 104 Stat. 5089; Confirmed by the Senate on October 6, 1994, and received commission on October 7, 1994. Assumed senior status on November 1, 2004.

Education:
Wesleyan University, B.A., 1961

Yale Law School, LL.B., 1965

Professional Career:
Fulbright scholar, University of Florence, Florence, Italy, 1962
Private practice, Manchester, Connecticut, 1966-1994
Counsel, Town of Manchester Housing Authority, 1972-1979
Counsel, Connecticut State Legislature Judiciary Committee, 1974-1975
Clerk, Connecticut State Committee on Executive Nominations, 1974-1978
Chief counsel, Connecticut State Senate, 1976-1980

Race or Ethnicity: White

Gender: Male


3 posted on 04/24/2007 9:07:20 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... In FReeP We Trust ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

4 posted on 04/24/2007 9:08:54 PM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
You forgot one line item on that excellent and informative list.

BONEHEAD

Nam Vet

5 posted on 04/24/2007 9:11:48 PM PDT by Nam Vet ( The original point and click interface was a Smith & Wesson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
"I'm walking into a place that's doing government business — selling stamps, mailing parcels and so forth — and they're doing this religious bit," Cooper, who is Jewish, said in 2003. His phone number is not listed, and he could not be reached for comment Tuesday.

Don't worry, Bertram - when the Muzzies start running your local post office, you'll be paying the jizya with a smile on your face, or they'll cut your "son of pigs and monkeys" head off...

And the black-robed clown Squatrito won't have the stones to say "boo" to 'em, either...

6 posted on 04/24/2007 9:14:22 PM PDT by an amused spectator (Gun Control, the Sequel: More and Morerer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
U.S. District Judge Dominic J. Squatrito, in a case involving a church-run post office in Manchester, ordered the Postal Service to notify the nearly 5,200 facilities run by contractors that they cannot promote religion through pamphlets, displays or any other materials.

How about with displays made up entirely of USPS Commemmorative Christmas stamps?

-PJ

7 posted on 04/24/2007 9:14:36 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (It's still not safe to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pierrem15
This is judicial fiat banishing religion from the public sphere, which is itslf a direct violation of the Constitution.

Funny how the looney libs fail to grasp this simple concept.

8 posted on 04/24/2007 9:15:40 PM PDT by SoldierDad (Proud Father of a 2nd BCT 10th Mountain Soldier fighting the terrorists in Iraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
"citing the constitutional separation of church and state."

Yea! It's not like church services were ever held in the federal US Treasury building or anything.
9 posted on 04/24/2007 9:25:53 PM PDT by Texas_Jarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Unfortunately, the PO always tells us that they no longer are a government entity.


10 posted on 04/24/2007 9:28:26 PM PDT by VeniVidiVici (Encourage illegal immigration! Maybe you too can be hit and killed by a drunk driver!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

This ruling is pretty clearly in violation of the 1st Amendment.


11 posted on 04/24/2007 9:28:34 PM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

I thought that the post office is not outright a government entity.


12 posted on 04/24/2007 10:19:39 PM PDT by weegee (Libs want us to learn to live with terrorism, but if a gun is used they want to rewrite the Const.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Religion has no place in post offices run by churches and other private contractors, a federal judge has ruled, citing the constitutional separation of church and state.

There is no constitutional separation of church and state...I wish they'd stop lying.

13 posted on 04/24/2007 10:29:19 PM PDT by highlander_UW (I don't know what my future holds, but I know Who holds my future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
...religious displays violate the clause calling for the separation of church

Surely this clause is cited in the decision - right??

14 posted on 04/24/2007 11:09:25 PM PDT by jonno (Having an opinion is not the same as having the answer...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: an amused spectator


15 posted on 04/24/2007 11:13:42 PM PDT by XR7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Squatrito

Evidently this judge doesn't know 'squat' about the Constitution.
16 posted on 04/24/2007 11:30:31 PM PDT by gpapa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too
depends on the religion.


17 posted on 04/24/2007 11:31:14 PM PDT by Diogenesis (Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: highlander_UW
There is no constitutional separation of church and state...I wish they'd stop lying.

It does become annoying over time, as does the claimed constitutional right to abortion, taken from the first and fourth amendments by activist judges who either couldn't read or couldn't speak English.

Amendment 1 - Freedom of Religion, Press, Expression

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Amendment 4 - Search and Seizure

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

18 posted on 04/24/2007 11:31:58 PM PDT by KarinG1 (Opinions expressed in this post are my own and do not necessarily represent those of sane people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: KarinG1

Perhaps one can argue that they can’t have an abortion because there is probably cause that there is a baby in there.


19 posted on 04/24/2007 11:39:48 PM PDT by highlander_UW (I don't know what my future holds, but I know Who holds my future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: weegee

You are correct. The Postal Service is an independent establishment of the Executive Branch. However, postal rates, except for special services, are tied to the rate of inflation, not a market rate.


20 posted on 04/24/2007 11:41:00 PM PDT by gpapa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson