Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: airedale

“If they attacked here it would strengthen George Bush and the Republicans and their interest is in strengthening a different party so after the next election things will be better for them. Brian York’s piece on the National Security Democrats hits the benefits to Al Qadeda to supporting and electing Democrats.”

Absolutely correct.

Attacking Iraq worked in showing American unpredictability and resolve to change world political support for terror. They know now they need far more a timid leadership in place if they want to be successful in getting back to the status quo they had before 9/11.

Democratic leadership is far easier to predict and manipulate using terror and lawfare on the global stage.


35 posted on 04/27/2007 12:38:48 PM PDT by Wiseghy ("You want to break this army? Then break your word to it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: Wiseghy

Dang, you made my point better than I did. :-)


38 posted on 04/27/2007 12:39:56 PM PDT by The Blitherer ("What the devil is keeping the Yanks?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: Wiseghy

Democratic leadership is far easier to predict and manipulate using terror and lawfare on the global stage.
= = =

Ain’t that the sorry, outrageous truth.


66 posted on 04/27/2007 1:50:20 PM PDT by Quix (GOD ALONE IS GOD; WORTHY; PAID THE PRICE; IS COMING AGAIN; KNOWS ALL; IS LOVING; IS ALTOGETHER GOOD!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson