Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Sounds like we'll have to do something about Iran during the Bush presidency, not wait for later.
1 posted on 04/27/2007 9:16:49 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: 2ndDivisionVet

Oh, we’ll just use diplomacy to make them be nice. The Dems tell us that’ll work just fine!


2 posted on 04/27/2007 9:20:00 PM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

<<
Iran Could Have Nuke Bomb by 2009
>>

I think it would be more neighborly if we went ahead and sent them one now.


3 posted on 04/27/2007 9:24:40 PM PDT by noblejones (Ben Stein for President, 2008.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“by 2009”

How clever. Wait just long enough to avoid possible United States military action.


4 posted on 04/27/2007 9:30:07 PM PDT by TeenagedConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Nice Inaugural present for HRH Shillary....


5 posted on 04/27/2007 9:31:33 PM PDT by Kozak (Anti Shahada: " There is no God named Allah, and Muhammed is his False Prophet")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Why is the US media so chicken -hit?

Time was.. there were REAL MEN in the media...MEN ON OUR SIDE!! MEN willing to ride with a US MILITARY HERO and perhaps pause for a prayer for his country or at least...the men he was riding with at the time.

Time was...when the United States was ‘INVINSIBLE’...and all enemies took pause...

Now a days, the democrats publish war plans in bills on CSPAN and the media does their best to degrade the American spirit and the will to win.

Be Afraid...be very afraid.....


6 posted on 04/27/2007 9:39:17 PM PDT by penelopesire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Given what we really know about the recent behaviors of our government and her most effective foreign lobbies (the UK, Italy, the Vatican, the “Palestinians,” the Chinese, the Mother Church of Russia, AKA the prevailing United Russia Party,...), and recent prevailing sentiments among the more windy, recently wealthy voters in both of our parties, Iran will develop nuclear weapons while continuing to form closer ties to the Saudis and other nations along the way. Too much of our materiel has been sitting around Iran for too long, and the political wind from all sides here just isn’t right. Physically stopping Iran isn’t even allowed by our current business and governmental leadership to be a viable topic.

IMO, our Government should invade, occupy and denazify Iran, but it’s not happening. She’ll come to us, and it doesn’t look like we’re going to be mentally prepared for it.


7 posted on 04/27/2007 9:48:02 PM PDT by familyop (former cbt. engr. (cbt.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Ominously, Riedel added that Iran would view an Israeli strike with American-made warplanes as no different than a U.S. strike, and the attack could touch off a war with Iran.

Hence we will attack WITH Israel.
The main object to learn from this is that the first strike
MUST MUST be decisive and utterly complete, no wussy, half ass drop a few smart bombs and hope they get the message kind of liberal example of war, but as total as we can make it from the get go.

So if Iran considers an Israeli strike as a U.S.strike
should we not consider an Al Quida attack as an Iranian one?


8 posted on 04/27/2007 10:19:41 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The way things look now — Iran may not exist in 2000..

It took just one certifiable lunatic a$$hole to destroy a nation -— thousands of years in the making..

Semper Fi


10 posted on 04/28/2007 12:16:35 AM PDT by river rat (You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Exactly.


12 posted on 04/28/2007 12:38:02 PM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
"Intel Report"

That would be the same "intel" that predicted the downfall of the Soviet Union?

LMFAO

Iran already has the bomb.

For those who still find it hard to understand - let me give you a hint.

Pakistan

17 posted on 04/30/2007 12:47:52 AM PDT by expatguy (http://laotze.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson