Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GovernmentShrinker
I don’t understand why this sort of truck (i.e. designed to carry thousands of gallons of hazardous material) isn’t required by law to be equipped with a mechanism that prevents it from exceeding 55 or 60 mph.

As has been noted, much of the blame lies (but will never be placed) on politicians who set artificially-low speed limits in so many places that speed limits are widely ignored even in those cases where they are necessary.

That having been said, a driver's logs should indicate whether he has a habit of speeding. No need for speed-restricting devices.

33 posted on 04/30/2007 8:29:31 PM PDT by supercat (Sony delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: supercat

I don’t think it’s really safe for one of these trucks to go over 60 mph in any circumstances. The maximum safe speed for these vehicles is a good deal less than the maximum safe speed for many other vehicles. Not only are they filled with explosive material that makes a crash a lot more dangerous than crashes involving other kinds of heavy cargo trucks, but the tremendous weight of the liquid fuel makes for a long braking distance.

I was about 1/2 mile away from the White Plains, NY propane tanker crash in 1994. The driver apparently fell asleep and hit the concrete support of an overpass. The exploding tank turned into a missile, flew 300 feet (in my direction), landing on a house full of sleeping people on a residential street. It sounded like a huge bomb had exploded, to people at least a mile from the explosion site. Several houses were burned down, and 23 people injured, included a 30 weeks-pregnant woman who was severely burned (as was her husband), and whose baby had to be delivered by emergency C-section and reportedly suffered some brain damage as a result of the trauma to the mother and/or the premature birth. Many of the residents of the block have experienced lasting psychological problems (post-traumatic stress disorder). There’s no way a truck loaded with groceries or building products can have this kind of effect, but fuel tankers are in a category of their own.


49 posted on 04/30/2007 9:00:15 PM PDT by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: supercat
Not to be argumentative, but logs will tell you only how well I can lie. That's why we call them "funny books". Besides, he may not be required to even keep a logbook, depends on whether or not his company uses the 100 air mile rule.

What will help to tell the story here is the ECM, it stores the parameters, how many depends the on year model of the truck. More than likely, highest speed attained is recorded, average speed is recorded, emergency braking is recorded, and highest rpm is recorded. Those are the bare bones. Most trucks built after 2002 have the capability of recording more. As well as his pumping receipts, they'll have the time/date stamped on them.

Most companies, especially hazmat haulers, have a satellite tracking system, usually Qualcomm or Highway Master, on the truck, that will most definitely tell his speed, number of hours the vehicle was moving, etc.

:O)

P
78 posted on 04/30/2007 10:32:29 PM PDT by papasmurf (Patience is, not only, a virtue...it's also a weapon. Be patient FRed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson