Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GONZALES WANTS ARBITRARY POWER TO BLOCK GUN PURCHASES; SAF SAYS HE SHOULD RESIGN
Second Amendment Foundation (email alert) ^ | 5/1/07 | Alan Gottlieb

Posted on 05/01/2007 12:47:00 PM PDT by Carry_Okie

BELLEVUE, WA – Attorney General Alberto Gonzales’ troubling support of legislation that would allow him and future attorneys general the arbitrary power to block firearms purchases without due process is cause for him to step down as the nation’s highest ranking law enforcement officer, the Second Amendment Foundation said today.

The bill, S. 1237, was introduced last week at the Justice Department’s request by Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ), one of the most extreme anti-gunners in Congress. Called the “Denying Firearms and Explosives to Dangerous Terrorists Act of 2007,” this legislation would give the Attorney General discretionary authority to deny the purchase of a firearm or the issuance of a firearm license or permit because of some vague suspicion that an American citizen may be up to no good.

“This bill,” said SAF founder Alan Gottlieb, “raises serious concerns about how someone becomes a ‘suspected terrorist.’ Nobody has explained how one gets their name on such a list, and worse, nobody knows how to get one’s name off such a list.

“The process by which someone may appeal the Attorney General’s arbitrary denial seems weak at best,” Gottlieb suggested, “and there is a greater concern. When did we decide as a nation that it is a good idea to give a cabinet member the power to deny someone’s constitutional right simply on suspicion, without a trial or anything approaching due process?

“We’re not surprised that General Gonzales has found an agreeable sponsor in Frank Lautenberg,” Gottlieb observed. “The senator from New Jersey has never seen a restrictive gun control scheme he did not immediately embrace, and S. 1237 is loaded with red flags. It would allow an appointed bureaucrat the authority to suspend or cancel someone’s Second Amendment right without even being charged with a crime.

“Attorney General Gonzales has no business asking for that kind of power over any tenet in the Bill of Rights,” Gottlieb said. “He took an oath to uphold the Constitution, not trample it. Perhaps it is time for him to go.”


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Government
KEYWORDS: albertogonzales; banglist; bootlick; cwii; doj; gonzales; gungrabber; lautenberg; libertysecurity; patriotact; phaedra; rkba; s1237; saf; secondamendment; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 441-449 next last
To: Always Right

You know, AR, if this was during the Klinton administration - FReepers would be screaming bloody murder over this action!


21 posted on 05/01/2007 12:56:18 PM PDT by Buffalo Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie

OOPS I Forgot (/sarc)


22 posted on 05/01/2007 12:56:37 PM PDT by GrandEagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: kerryusama04
Well if the Bush administration keeps this up, conservatives are going to be asking to impeach Bush. They could do that over the border tomorrow and I would be on board.

The poor alien fools want to impeach Bush too, and he's on their side.

Javier Rodriguez, the organizer of the illegal alien amnesty marches just called for the impeachement of Bush and Cheney on CNN. Yeah, these are the voters we need...... http://maydaymovement.blogspot.com/

23 posted on 05/01/2007 12:56:43 PM PDT by AuntB (" It takes more than walking across the border to be an American." Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie

If this is true, he needs to go.


24 posted on 05/01/2007 12:57:17 PM PDT by Let's Roll (As usual, following a shooting spree, libs want to take guns away from those who DIDN'T do it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie

So Gonzalez got a democrat anti-gun maniac to bring in his request to Congress? Useless. Both of them.


25 posted on 05/01/2007 12:57:33 PM PDT by twonie (RUDY FOR PRESIDENT '08. THERE - A COMMITMENT OUT LOUD.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kerryusama04

Gonzales said his parents came from Mexico. He couldn’t ‘recall’ if they were illegal or not.


26 posted on 05/01/2007 12:57:48 PM PDT by AuntB (" It takes more than walking across the border to be an American." Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator
If you wish to add a source URL, this release is now up on the SAF page.

http://www.saf.org/viewpr-new.asp?id=223

Is this breaking news?

27 posted on 05/01/2007 12:57:53 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (There are people in power who are truly evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: twonie

You are too kind.:<)


28 posted on 05/01/2007 12:58:53 PM PDT by AuntB (" It takes more than walking across the border to be an American." Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
Subliminal hint to President:


29 posted on 05/01/2007 12:59:14 PM PDT by P-40 (Al Qaeda was working in Iraq. They were just undocumented.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P-40
lmao
30 posted on 05/01/2007 12:59:52 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (There are people in power who are truly evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
Gottlieb said. “He took an oath to uphold the Constitution, not trample it. Perhaps it is time for him to go.”

I agree. No exceptions regardless of party affiliation.

31 posted on 05/01/2007 1:00:16 PM PDT by beltfed308 (Rudy: When you absolutely,positively need a liberal for President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie

When did we decide as a nation that it is a good idea to give a cabinet member the power to deny someone’s constitutional right simply on suspicion, without a trial or anything approaching due process?
_______________________

This is an interesting question. I don’t remember this gentleman bringing it up when the discussion was about warrantless wiretaps. I guess the higher numbered Amendment (2) takes precedence over the lower (4).


32 posted on 05/01/2007 1:00:32 PM PDT by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
Like Roberts and Alito?

I didn't say he picks only losers. But it is a mixed bag, at best.

33 posted on 05/01/2007 1:00:32 PM PDT by steve86 (Acerbic by nature, not nurture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: BearWash
“Bush really has a knack for picking the loosers.”

Not just picking the losers, sticking with them no matter what happens.

Loyalty’s a wonderful attribute, but too much of anything isn’t good.

34 posted on 05/01/2007 1:00:54 PM PDT by vetsvette (Bring Him Back)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
And the shredding of our Constitution continues.
35 posted on 05/01/2007 1:01:32 PM PDT by tiger-one (The night has a thousand eyes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
The bill, S. 1237, was introduced last week at the Justice Department’s request by Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ), one of the most extreme anti-gunners in Congress. Called the “Denying Firearms and Explosives to Dangerous Terrorists Act of 2007,” this legislation would give the Attorney General discretionary authority to deny the purchase of a firearm or the issuance of a firearm license or permit because of some vague suspicion that an American citizen may be up to no good.

Even if this thing could get through the both the House and Senate and be signed into law, it canNOT pass Constitutional muster.

36 posted on 05/01/2007 1:01:46 PM PDT by MozarkDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie

IMHO he is acting on the behest of Bush!


37 posted on 05/01/2007 1:01:56 PM PDT by stockpirate (Al Qaeda is in the United States, they are in the House and Senate, Democrats all!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: dmz
Your point reflects exactly my concerns about the PATRIOT Act as it currently stands.

One can only imagine what Hillary would do with the power to deem conservatives "terrorists." Anyone exercising their Second Amendment right to resist tyranny would qualify.

38 posted on 05/01/2007 1:02:27 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (There are people in power who are truly evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
Add this to their elimination of Posse Comitatus last year...
39 posted on 05/01/2007 1:02:47 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Elections have consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie

If Conservatives were to call for impeachment over this issue, imagine the consternation that would cause among the Libs...


40 posted on 05/01/2007 1:03:09 PM PDT by sourcery (Democrat: n. 1. Quiche-eating surrender donkey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 441-449 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson