[tcrlaf]

TRANSLATION: "We just don't know how many important DEMOCRATS are on the list, yet!!"

If it has lots of the Washington Democrat Elite, this story gets buried faster than a Clinton Aide in Marcy Park...(IMHO)

[Sicon]

We would have to see who is on the list, we would have to look at matters of fairness

IOTW, if there are 10 times as many dems as Republicans on the list, it would only be "fair" to publish an equal number of names from both parties. If, on the other hand, the ratio is 10 to 1 the other way, it would only be "fair" to publish 10 Republican names to every 1 dem name.

[glorgau]

"We would have to see who is on the list, we would have to look at matters of fairness, and of accuracy."

Code words for selective release.

[weegee]

One “conservative” has already been run out of office by ABCDisney’s partisan release of the news. Release all of the names.

The DNC cannot be allowed to continue colluding with the MSM on “facts”.

[mikey_hates_everything]

That Roanoke newspaper is good at printing lists of people who have firearms permits. Or how about NBC? They didn’t hesitate to blast out that wacko’s diatribe before he killed 32 at Va Tech when they received it.

Isn’t the “list” just phone records anyway (numbers, no names)?

[bert]

We are Waiting.... For Playboy or National Enquirer to begin. Once started,we’ll pile on.

[bert]

The name of the game is Yahoo(or Google if you lean left)

Item 94 on the list is Orlando 407 425 4277

Search for that number and you get: http://local.yahoo.com/details?fr=dd-local-more&id=14115088

A condo in Orlando.

For those of you with a little time to play, search for some numbers on the list.

The list is here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1827219/posts

[AD from SpringBay]

Wouldn’t it be interesting if the list just happened to land on a blog while the reluctant dinosaurs were still trying to cover their democrats?

[Steve_Seattle]

Can someone explain to me why - of all the names supposedly on this list - the only two that have come out so far are both associated with the Bush administration, and the Iraq war in particular? Or is the answer obvious?

[philled]

"You would have to evaluate it to the extent humanly possible and verify it,"

I think what he really was trying to say was "We are compiling a database of all know pseudonyms used by and anagrams of William Jefferson Clinton. These names will, most assuredly, not be on the list."

[an amused spectator]

A “this story gets buried faster than a Clinton Aide in Marcy Park” bump