Jim, I noticed your posts that clearly indicate that you are not a Rudy fan. However, I haven’t been following your comments.
At the end of the day, if it is between Rudy and Hitlery, do you think Rudy is truly worse for the US than her royal heinous?
Chill out. It’s still primary season.
At the start of the day, please explain the differences between Rudy Giuliani and Hillary Clinton in the following areas:
The first amendment, McCain-Feingold, thought crimes
The second amendment, gun control
The unalienable right to life, abortion, partial birth abortion, federal funding for abortion
The gay agenda, family, marriage, thought crimes
Illegal aliens, sanctuary cities, amnesty, the rule of law
Respect for the constitution
And follow that up with a discussion on which liberal candidate Rudy or Hillary would be more likely as president with a liberally controlled House and Senate to do the most damage in the short and long terms to the conservative movement, the right to life movement, the right to keep and bear arms movement, the traditional values movement, our border security movement, etc. Would a Republican and RINO minority fight as hard against a liberal Republican president as they would against a liberal democrat?
Wouldn’t the conservative GOP look pretty much like a joke after having fought so hard against abortion, the gay agenda, gun control, etc. for all these years and decades and now suddenly elect a liberal? Besides the conservative movement being killed off, wouldn’t the GOP have lost ALL of its credibility and wouldn’t it be pretty much dead forever after?
And finally, why does it have to be Rudy vs Hillary at this point in time? Isn't there any possiblity that it could be the Liberal Hillary (or some other liberal moonbat Democrat) against a conservative Republican?
Have you no confidence in your own convictions?
I know you haven't really thought all this through yet, so I'm just asking.
>>At the end of the day, if it is between Rudy and Hitlery, do you think Rudy is truly worse for the US than her royal heinous?<<
I’d bet my car that Jim won’t vote for Hillary.
But I would ask “why is this the question of the day for conservatives?” We have not even had the first primary and Rudy is not leading in either Iowa of Massachusetts - back to back early losses could leave him vulnerable for conservatives to pick their guy on mega-Tuesday (or whatever they are calling it).
Has any war ever been won by assuming defeat and worrying about who we would prefer to be conquered by?