Skip to comments.
CNN.com 'implies Reagan was insane'--Network changes headline after WND exposes 'bias'
WorldNetDaily.com ^
| May 2, 2007
| Joe Kovacs
Posted on 05/03/2007 5:18:49 AM PDT by SJackson
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
1
posted on
05/03/2007 5:18:52 AM PDT
by
SJackson
To: SJackson
CNN is apparently witless.
2
posted on
05/03/2007 5:21:35 AM PDT
by
Paladin2
(Islam is the religion of violins, NOT peas.)
To: SJackson
What else do you expect from the Clinton News Network?
To: SJackson
nah, there’s no media bias..
4
posted on
05/03/2007 5:22:14 AM PDT
by
GeorgiaDawg32
(The early bird gets the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese..)
To: SJackson
Well, it’s questionably worded, but in all fairness they could be referring to the insanity of the times, and as long as they published the whole joke, its pretty funny.
5
posted on
05/03/2007 5:22:47 AM PDT
by
oakcon
(America wants you: Run Fred Run!)
To: SJackson
This kind of tweaking is done constantly...and is rarely exposed.
To: SJackson
CNN is despicable as always. And WingNutDaily’s use of “some believe” is an editorializing cop-out. Either name your source or don’t use it.
7
posted on
05/03/2007 5:28:45 AM PDT
by
gcruse
To: SJackson
8
posted on
05/03/2007 5:29:09 AM PDT
by
Vaquero
(" an armed society is a polite society" Heinlein "MOLON LABE!" Leonidas of Sparta)
To: SJackson
if they add reagan’s “wit” to their own “nit”, then what do you get? CNN! (nitwit)
9
posted on
05/03/2007 5:29:50 AM PDT
by
camle
(keep your mind open and somebody will fill it full of something for you)
To: SJackson
From the same CNN that gave you the series: “A Broken Government” that ran weeks before the 2006 elections when Congress was up for grabs.
CNN is blatant in their Marxism.
10
posted on
05/03/2007 5:31:19 AM PDT
by
Obadiah
(Republicans - the battered wives of Democrats.)
To: oakcon
Well, its questionably worded, but in all fairness they could be referring to the insanity of the times, and as long as they published the whole joke, its pretty funny. What "insanity of the times"? BTW, Reagan was quoting Sam Levenson.
11
posted on
05/03/2007 5:32:59 AM PDT
by
Charles Martel
(Liberals are the crab grass in the lawn of life.)
To: Paladin2
Well, by Communist News Network standards, he
was insane. He didn't want to live in a socialist worker's utopia and his policies helped hasten the demise of CNN's model utopia where dissenters could be put in asylums for daring to oppose their socialist overlords.
God give us more such insanity!
12
posted on
05/03/2007 5:35:25 AM PDT
by
Vigilanteman
(Are there any men left in Washington? Or are there only cowards? Ahmad Shah Massoud)
To: SJackson
I believe CNN overall has a definite liberal bias. However, in this instance I believe the headline was referring to what Reagan said about insanity being hereditary. I believe some of the WND readers took CNN’s headline out of context.
13
posted on
05/03/2007 5:35:49 AM PDT
by
eastcobb
To: SJackson
...and we used to laugh at Pravda.
14
posted on
05/03/2007 5:36:58 AM PDT
by
blam
To: oakcon
If you have ever had children, you will not have a problem understanding exactly what President Reagan was saying.
To: SJackson
I’ve seen that on a million t-shirts. Geesh.
16
posted on
05/03/2007 5:45:46 AM PDT
by
GOP_Proud
(How covert was Valerie Plame at the CIA? Her top-secret code name was "Valerie Plame." ...Coulter)
To: Paladin2; Vaquero
17
posted on
05/03/2007 5:48:22 AM PDT
by
Diogenesis
(Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
To: gcruse
some believe or “some say”
Katy Couric’s is favorite cop out for her opinioned questions.
18
posted on
05/03/2007 5:49:32 AM PDT
by
preacher
(A government which robs from Peter to pay Paul will always have the support of Paul.)
To: SJackson
In the article, Reagan was quoted as writing in his diary that there’s a new kind of insanity going asround...you catch it from your kids. This comment was after a row with two of his. The whole BS has been blown way out of proportion. If anyone bothered to read the article, it was easy to see where the article’s title came from. Dumb reaction to a harmless title by the uninformed.
To: preacher
That’s true. “Some say” means what follows is part of my agenda.
20
posted on
05/03/2007 6:01:19 AM PDT
by
gcruse
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson