Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WaPost: Democrats Back Down On Iraq Timetable
The Washington Post ^ | Thursday, May 3, 2007; Page A01 | Jonathan Weisman and Shailagh Murray

Posted on 05/03/2007 6:33:51 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach

President Bush and congressional leaders began negotiating a second war funding bill yesterday, with Democrats offering the first major concession: an agreement to drop their demand for a timeline to bring troops home from Iraq.

Democrats backed off after the House failed, on a vote of 222 to 203, to override the president's veto of a $124 billion measure that would have required U.S. forces to begin withdrawing as early as July. But party leaders made it clear that the next bill will have to include language that influences war policy. Senate Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (Nev.) outlined a second measure that would step up Iraqi accountability, "transition" the U.S. military role and show "a reasonable way to end this war."

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 110th; defeatocrats; democrats; dhimmicrats; iraq; iraqsurge; pelosi; reid; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last
To: phillyfanatic

Blaming Bush is now an obsessive compulsive behavior on the left and unfortunately some on our side are also suffering from it.


41 posted on 05/03/2007 10:41:51 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Syncro

Correct, the President has good enough freedom to allocate money from other parts of the budget, in particular the Pentagon budget, to fund the war.


42 posted on 05/03/2007 10:43:44 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Posturing and then winning is not stupid. Bush will now agree to have his hands tied to some degree. He’s already said as much. This is an egregious infringement on the rights of the Executive, IMO.


43 posted on 05/03/2007 10:56:52 AM PDT by Nonstatist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Nonstatist

What did the democrats win?


44 posted on 05/03/2007 11:04:02 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Emasculating and weakening the Presidency (ie. Bush). The President alone has the right to direct foreign policy. If he doesent want time limits, then that should be it; now it looks like he’ll cut some sort of deal on that, IMO


45 posted on 05/03/2007 11:09:20 AM PDT by Nonstatist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Thanks Ernie for the leg work. If I had more time I would have posted it. Things sure taint what they look like from the occasional news readers view. Obviously we look at the compost with juandice eyes for good reasons but if this babe is really pulling *hit off, it would go a far way in seeing why Sadr and his goons have gotten off rather softly of lately.


46 posted on 05/03/2007 8:36:42 PM PDT by Marine_Uncle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson