Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dems outline plans for Iraq bill
Politico ^ | 5/4/07

Posted on 05/04/2007 9:41:44 AM PDT by bnelson44

Rep. Dave Obey (D-Wis.) outlined a new plan for an Iraq funding bill in private meetings Thursday afternoon, congressional aides said.

The plan would split the now vetoed supplemental spending bill into two bills, one that would provide two months of funding for the Iraq War and another that would fund the agricultural programs contained in the earlier bill, aides said.

In addition to the two months of Iraq funding, the bill would provide a $10 billion cushion to allow the military flexibility. It would also require the president to report back to Congress by July 13 on the extent to which the Iraqi government had met certain benchmarks for progress.

The plan would "fence off" additional combat funds until Congress voted to "unfence" them. Such a vote would be held on July 24. A vote of the FY08 defense appropriations bill would be delayed until September, one aide said.

Pelosi was present at the meetings with Obey, aides said. A spokesman for Pelosi had no comment on whether she was supportive of the new plan.

One of the private meetings was with members of the Out of Iraq Caucus, who seemed pleased with the proposal, aides said.

(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News
KEYWORDS: iraq

1 posted on 05/04/2007 9:41:50 AM PDT by bnelson44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bnelson44

two months of funding???????


2 posted on 05/04/2007 9:51:25 AM PDT by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44

Obey is a pimp...he never cudda outfought Bush...but I didn’t know til this very day...it was Murtha all along.

this was the Plan B Murtha was talkin about...


3 posted on 05/04/2007 9:52:45 AM PDT by stylin19a (It's easier to get up at 6:00 AM to play golf than at 10:00 to mow the yard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44
What kind of crummy reporting is this?

It doesn’t even address the MAJOR issue.

Does the new bill have any kind of timetable for cutting and running?

Whether it does or does not, this info should be in the article.

4 posted on 05/04/2007 9:53:23 AM PDT by upchuck (Jesus Christ and the American Soldier: One died for your soul; the other for your freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44

Democrats are loosing this battle and they know it. They have BS’d the American people one too many times.


5 posted on 05/04/2007 9:56:50 AM PDT by RC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

You expected to learn whether the timetable would be taken out?

With the kind of stealth legislation the Democraticans are forced to resort to, this bill will STILL have the timetable written in with invisible ink, designed to become visible only AFTER Bush has signed the interim funding bill.

What will happen is that the funding will be re-authorized on 60-day increments, until the Democraticans are confident of their ability to force through a timetable.

The timetable is their real objective, all the time. Meanwhile, Bush is forced to come back to Congress, hat in hand, every couple of months.


6 posted on 05/04/2007 10:00:24 AM PDT by alloysteel (For those who cannot turn back time, there is always the option of re-writing history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel
Meanwhile, Bush is forced to come back to Congress, hat in hand, every couple of months.

President Bush seems to have found his cojones. At least on this particular topic. So maybe he will veto this short time funding bill as well.

7 posted on 05/04/2007 11:20:59 AM PDT by upchuck (Per June: Life is like a roll of toilet paper, the closer it gets to the end, the faster it goes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44

The Rats really have sunk to a new low if they are going to send a bill for signature that only covers 2 MONTHS of funding. I do agree there should be benchmarks for the Iraqi Govt since theyre the ones who seem to be dragging their feet. But the bill should be the $100 Billion originally requested. This is NOT compromise - this is partisan democratic BS!!


8 posted on 05/04/2007 11:43:44 AM PDT by wingsof liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44

TWO MONTHS?!?!

WTH??????

I hate them more with each passing day.


9 posted on 05/04/2007 11:46:48 AM PDT by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet -Fred'08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson