Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Egyptian Government Weekly Allege Ties Between Iraqi PM and Iranian Revolutionary Guards
MEMRI ^ | 4 May 2007 | MEMRI

Posted on 05/04/2007 6:28:52 PM PDT by Cornpone

An investigative article by journalist Mahdi Mustafa, published March 31, 2007 in the Egyptian government weekly Al-Ahram Al-Arabi, featured photographs of documents indicating that Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri Al-Maliki has ties with Muqtada Al-Sadr and with the Iranian Revolutionary Guards. [1]

The following are the main points of the article:

Al-Maliki Calls to Withdraw Iranian Revolutionary Guards Commanders from the Iraqi Front in Order to Protect Them The first document, labeled "secret, personal, and urgent," is a January 2007 letter from Al-Maliki's office to the Iranian Embassy in Baghdad, with copies to the presidency of the [Shi'ite party] Supreme Council of the Islamic Revolution in Iraq and to the Al-Shahid Al-Sadr organization." [2] In it, Al-Maliki requests that the commanders of the Mahdi Army, who have ties with the Iranian Revolutionary Guards, be pulled off the Iraqi frontlines, in order to protect them from being arrested or killed. The following is a translation of the document:

"Secret, Personal and Urgent

"Based on a phone conversation with Sayyid Muqtada Al-Sadr and [after] consulting with [Iraq's National Security Advisor] Dr. Muwafaq Al-Rubai'i, in order to preserve our great achievements and in light of what the present circumstances demand, we ask to temporarily conceal the commanders of the Mahdi Army, who are connected to the Iranian Revolutionary Guards, [and to remove them] from the front line [of battle] in order to protect them from being arrested or killed by the American forces. [The names of the commanders] are listed below. It would be best to send them to Iran for the time being, until the crisis passes.

"In addition, [we ask] to send the commanders from the second line [of battle] to the southern regions, since we know that intensive efforts are underway to persuade the Americans to leave the situation [there] as it is. All administrative and security arrangements for the transportation of these commanders have [already] been made.

"We ask you to implement [these orders] and report to us.

"[Signed,] Nouri Al-Maliki, Prime Minster [of Iraq]

"[List of commanders]…

"Cc:

"The Iranian Embassy [in] Baghdad,

"The presidency of the Supreme Council of the Islamic Revolution in Iraq,

"The office of Al-Shahid Al-Sadr."

Al-Maliki Orders Release of Iranians Who Entered Iraq Illegally The two other documents presented in the article reveal that Al-Maliki ordered that Iranians who entered Iraq illegally be released from prison. The first of these documents is a letter from Al-Maliki to the presidency of the Iraqi Supreme Judicial Council, with copies to several Iraqi ministries, including the foreign ministry, which was asked to inform the Iranian embassy of the letter's content.

In this document, Al-Maliki presents a list of Iranians accused of entering the country illegally, and orders to "release them [from prison] and suspend all judicial [proceedings against them]... except for those who have already been sentenced..."

In the second document, Supreme Judicial Council President Madhat Al-Mahmoud confirms that 442 of the Iranians on the list have been released in accordance with Al-Maliki's order.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Front Page News; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: iran; iraq; islam; maliki; muhammadsminions; revolutionaryguards; taqiyya

1 posted on 05/04/2007 6:28:59 PM PDT by Cornpone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cornpone

Such a surprise. /s


2 posted on 05/04/2007 6:42:07 PM PDT by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cornpone; OrthodoxPresbyterian
I'm so surprised that Maliki, a known terrorist, is consorting with a terror state against American soldiers.

I wonder how many of our soldiers and the new Iraqi police/military will have to take a bullet from these freed Iranians before this sham of Iraqi democracy is finally fully exposed.

I guess we're about ready for the "Sure he's a terrorist but he's our terrorist" phase of the Iraq debate. See Osama bin Laden and Saddam for the track record of these creatures.
3 posted on 05/04/2007 7:05:25 PM PDT by George W. Bush (Election Math For Dummies: GOP รท Rudi = Hillary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sageb1

That is the same document published here on FR three months ago and was proved to be fake. I need to research it and I will show you why it is fake.


4 posted on 05/04/2007 7:06:51 PM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

mark


5 posted on 05/04/2007 7:16:24 PM PDT by BARLF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Thanks, j. I don’t think I saw the other one.


6 posted on 05/04/2007 7:16:58 PM PDT by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sageb1; All
OK I found it. This was posted earlier on FR http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1785827/posts .

Post 14 in the attached link has the Arabic document. It is fake because it only carries our Christian Calender Date ( 1/2007) and does not carry the islamic calender date. No Arabic official document in any Arabic country (except in Lebanon) has only the Christian calender date but it also carries the islamic calender date and in some cases it only carries the islamic calender date. I read ober 2000 Saddam regime documents not a single one does not have both calender dates. I doubt very much that the new Iraqi government will not follow the same traditions followed by the other Arab and muslim countries.

7 posted on 05/04/2007 7:19:31 PM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Good catch! Thanks for looking it up. Wonder who’s responsible.


8 posted on 05/04/2007 7:23:41 PM PDT by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
jveritas, you are a treasure.

I suspect Pelosi and Assad. ...;)))

9 posted on 05/04/2007 7:29:10 PM PDT by BARLF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: BARLF; sageb1
Thanks FRiends. There are many evil elements who want to create problems and a trust crisis between us and Maliki to undermine the war. Iran, Syria, Al Qaeda, Sunni groups, AL Sadrists, you name it, anyone of these can be responsible for this fake document.
10 posted on 05/04/2007 7:32:56 PM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush
I guess we're about ready for the "Sure he's a terrorist but he's our terrorist" phase of the Iraq debate. See Osama bin Laden and Saddam for the track record of these creatures.

Most likely the docs are fake.

But, at the drop of a hat you believe it.

11 posted on 05/04/2007 7:56:52 PM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

And why shouldn’t we? We know that Sadr is in bed with Iran and Maliki has protected Sadr from our wrath before.


12 posted on 05/04/2007 8:21:50 PM PDT by misterrob (Yankees Suck!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: sageb1

“Good catch! Thanks for looking it up. Wonder who’s responsible.”

Now who in the Middle East would want to implicate Maliki for nefarious collusion with Sadr and the Iranians? Don’t you mean which Sunni nation?? Don’t you mean the most concerned Sunni nation?? Still aren’t sure?


13 posted on 05/04/2007 8:33:00 PM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: misterrob
And why shouldn’t we? We know that Sadr is in bed with Iran and Maliki has protected Sadr from our wrath before. Huh?

Our president currently supports Maliki. Meanwhile, we don't know from a hole in the wall who the hell this Egyptian reporter is.

But you choose to trust the Egyptian reporter.

Anyway, both Maliki and our CIC seems to have put Sadr on hold for a couple of years, possibly so that we could train up 350,000 Iraqi security forces. Also we've been fighting Al Qaeda in Iraq those past couple of years.

Back to this story, it appears to be BS.

14 posted on 05/04/2007 8:35:41 PM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fedora; Fred Nerks; KlueLass; ...

An investigative reporter, from Egypt? Gee, this whole story resonates with bona fides, not least, that there’s barely anything resembling a free press in Egypt, and the Egyptians have no interest in the well-being of American troops.

For that matter, as of 9/11/01, it’s clear they have no interest in the well-being of Americans in general.


15 posted on 05/04/2007 8:46:00 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (I last updated my profile on Thursday, May 3, 2007. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

what a memri
thx


16 posted on 05/04/2007 10:03:08 PM PDT by kvanbrunt2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson